Jun Wang

Dr. Jun Wang

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 November 2021 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Chenjie RenChenjie Ren
Chenjie Ren
JWJieying Wang
Jieying Wang
FBFelipe Bastida
Felipe Bastida
MDManuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
YYYuanhe Yang
Yuanhe Yang
Fazhu ZhaoFazhu Zhao
Fazhu Zhao

25 July 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chenjie RenChenjie Ren
Chenjie Ren
ZZZhenghu Zhou
Zhenghu Zhou
MDManuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
FBFelipe Bastida
Felipe Bastida
Fazhu ZhaoFazhu Zhao
Fazhu Zhao
GWGehong Wei
Gehong Wei
Understanding the large-scale pattern of soil microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) and its temperature sensitivity (CUET) is critical for understanding soil carbon–climate feedback. We used the18O-H2O tracer method to quantify CUE and CUETalong a north-south forest transect. Climate was the primary factor that affected CUE and CUET, predominantly through direct pathways, then by altering soil properties, carbon fractions, microbial structure and functions. Negative CUET(CUE decreases with measuring temperature) in cold forests (mean annual temperature lower than 10 °C) and positive CUET(CUE increases with measuring temperature) in warm forests (mean annual temperature greater than 10 °C) suggest that microbial CUE optimally operates at their adapted temperature. Overall, the plasticity of microbial CUE and its temperature sensitivity alter the feedback of soil carbon to climate warming; that is, a climate-adaptive microbial community has the capacity to reduce carbon loss from soil matrices under corresponding favorable climate conditions.

18 March 2011 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jun WangJun Wang
Jun Wang
WLWenzhao Liu
Wenzhao Liu
TDTinghui Dang
Tinghui Dang

27 April 2022 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Muhammad AdilMuhammad Adil
Muhammad Adil
SZShaohong Zhang
Shaohong Zhang
Jun WangJun Wang
Jun Wang
ASAdnan Noor Shah
Adnan Noor Shah
MTMohsin Tanveer
Mohsin Tanveer
SFSajid Fiaz
Sajid Fiaz
Winter wheat monoculture is a predominant cropping system for agricultural production in dry areas. However, fallow management effects on soil water conservation and crop yield and water use have been inconsistent among studies. We selected 137 studies and performed a meta-analysis to test the effects of tillage and mulching during the fallow period on precipitation storage efficiency (PSE), soil water storage at wheat planting (SWSp), crop yield, evapotranspiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE). Compared to conventional tillage (CT), conservation tillage during fallow period overall increased PSE, SWSp and wheat yield by 31.0, 6.4, and 7.9%, respectively, but did not affect ET and WUE. No tillage (NT) had a better performance on soil water conservation during fallow period but a similar effect on wheat yield and WUE compared to reduced tillage (RT) and subsoil tillage (ST). Compared to no mulching, fallow mulching practices overall increased PSE by 19.4%, but had a non-significant impact on SWSp, wheat yield, and ET. Compared to straw mulching, film mulching, and stubble mulching during fallow period, cover cropping as a biological mulching decreased SWSp, wheat yield, and WUE significantly. Wheat WUE was improved by straw mulching but not affected by film mulching and stubble mulching. Strong interactions between tillage method and mulching practices were found for most variables. NT with fallow mulching or with no mulching exhibited a greater impact on soil water conservation during fallow period compared to other combinations. The effects of tillage and mulching during fallow period on soil water conservation and wheat yield and water use also varied with soil and climatic conditions. Overall, NT in combination with straw mulching significantly increased SWSp, PSE, wheat yield, and WUE and can be the best fallow management practice for winter wheat production in varying edaphic and climatic conditions.

1 July 2018 in Agricultural Water Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jun WangJun Wang
Jun Wang
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire
XFXin Fu
Xin Fu
Upendra M SainjuUpendra M Sainju
Upendra M Sainju
WLWenzhao Liu
Wenzhao Liu

1 April 2020 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FZFazhu Zhao
Fazhu Zhao
XFXiuxiu Feng
Xiuxiu Feng
YGYaoxing Guo
Yaoxing Guo
CRChengjie Ren
Chengjie Ren
Jun WangJun Wang
Jun Wang
RDRussell Doughty
Russell Doughty