Anders Kaestner

Dr. Anders Kaestner

Instrument scientist ICON, Paul Scherrer Institute, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2011 in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anders KaestnerAnders Kaestner
Anders Kaestner
SHS. Hartmann
S. Hartmann
GKG. Kühne
G. Kühne
GFG. Frei
G. Frei
CGC. Grünzweig
C. Grünzweig
ELEberhard Lehmann
Eberhard Lehmann

1 September 2008 in Advances in Water Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anders KaestnerAnders Kaestner
Anders Kaestner
ELEberhard Lehmann
Eberhard Lehmann
MSM. Stampanoni
M. Stampanoni

1 September 2008 in Advances in Water Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BAB. Ahrenholz
B. Ahrenholz
JTJ. Tölke
J. Tölke
PLP. Lehmann
P. Lehmann
APA. Peters
A. Peters
Anders KaestnerAnders Kaestner
Anders Kaestner
WDWolfgang Durner
Wolfgang Durner

26 October 2015 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMBarbara Michalak
Barbara Michalak
HSHeino Sommer
Heino Sommer
DMDavid Mannes
David Mannes
Anders KaestnerAnders Kaestner
Anders Kaestner
Torsten BrezesinskiTorsten Brezesinski
Torsten Brezesinski
JJJürgen Janek
Jürgen Janek
Gas generation as a result of electrolyte decomposition is one of the major issues of high-performance rechargeable batteries. Here, we report the direct observation of gassing in operating lithium-ion batteries using neutron imaging. This technique can be used to obtain qualitative as well as quantitative information by applying a new analysis approach. Special emphasis is placed on high voltage LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/graphite pouch cells. Continuous gassing due to oxidation and reduction of electrolyte solvents is observed. To separate gas evolution reactions occurring on the anode from those associated with the cathode interface and to gain more insight into the gassing behavior of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/graphite cells, neutron experiments were also conducted systematically on other cathode/anode combinations, including LiFePO4/graphite, LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li4Ti5O12 and LiFePO4/Li4Ti5O12. In addition, the data were supported by gas pressure measurements. The results suggest that metal dissolution in the electrolyte and decomposition products resulting from the high potentials adversely affect the gas generation, particularly in the first charge cycle (i.e., during graphite solid-electrolyte interface layer formation).

3 January 2018 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMutez Ali Ahmed
Mutez Ali Ahmed
MZMohsen Zarebanadkouki
Mohsen Zarebanadkouki
FMFélicien Meunier
Félicien Meunier
MJMathieu Javaux
Mathieu Javaux
Anders KaestnerAnders Kaestner
Anders Kaestner
ACAndrea Carminati
Andrea Carminati
The ability of plants to take up water from the soil depends on both the root architecture and the distribution and evolution of the hydraulic conductivities among root types and along the root length. The mature maize (Zea mays L.) root system is composed of primary, seminal, and crown roots together with their respective laterals. Our understanding of root water uptake of maize is largely based on measurements of primary and seminal roots. Crown roots might have a different ability to extract water from the soil, but their hydraulic function remains unknown. The aim of this study was to measure the location of water uptake in mature maize and investigate differences between seminal, crown, and lateral roots. Neutron radiography and injections of deuterated water were used to visualize the root architecture and water transport in 5-week-old maize root systems. Water was mainly taken up by crown roots. Seminal roots and their laterals, which were the main location of water uptake in younger plants, made a minor contribution to water uptake. In contrast to younger seminal roots, crown roots were also able to take up water from their most distal segments. The greater uptake of crown roots compared with seminal roots is explained by their higher axial conductivity in the proximal parts and by the fact that they are connected to the shoot above the seminal roots, which favors the propagation of xylem tension along the crown roots. The deeper water uptake of crown roots is explained by their shorter and fewer laterals, which decreases the dissipation of water potential along the roots.

1 January 2019 in Vadose Zone Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPascal Benard
Pascal Benard
MZMohsen Zarebanadkouki
Mohsen Zarebanadkouki
MBMathilde Brax
Mathilde Brax
RKRobin Kaltenbach
Robin Kaltenbach
IJIwan Jerjen
Iwan Jerjen
ACAndrea Carminati
Andrea Carminati
Core Ideas: Plant mucilage and bacterial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) prevent the breakup of the soil liquid phase. Formation of continuous structures buffers soil hydraulic properties. The release of viscous polymeric substances represents a universal strategy. Plant roots and bacteria are capable of buffering erratic fluctuations of water content in their local soil environment by releasing a diverse, highly polymeric blend of substances (e.g. extracellular polymeric substances [EPS] and mucilage). Although this concept is well accepted, the physical mechanisms by which EPS and mucilage interact with the soil matrix and determine the soil water dynamics remain unclear. High‐resolution X‐ray computed tomography revealed that upon drying in porous media, mucilage (from maize [ Zea mays L.] roots) and EPS (from intact biocrusts) form filaments and two‐dimensional interconnected structures spanning across multiple pores. Unlike water, these mucilage and EPS structures connecting soil particles did not break up upon drying, which is explained by the high viscosity and low surface tension of EPS and mucilage. Measurements of water retention and evaporation with soils mixed with seed mucilage show how these one‐ and two‐dimensional pore‐scale structures affect macroscopic hydraulic properties (i.e., they enhance water retention, preserve the continuity of the liquid phase in drying soils, and decrease vapor diffusivity and local drying rates). In conclusion, we propose that the release of viscous polymeric substances and the consequent creation of a network bridging the soil pore space represent a universal strategy of plants and bacteria to engineer their own soil microhydrological niches where stable conditions for life are preserved.