The aim of the study was to report the outcome of primary localized low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS), sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF), and hybrid LGFMS/SEF (H-LGFMS/SEF). Patients with primary localized LGFMS, SEF, or H-LGFMS/SEF, surgically treated with curative intent from January 2000 to September 2022, were enrolled from 14 countries and 27 institutions. Pathologic inclusion criteria were predefined by expert pathologists. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of local recurrence (LR), CCI of distant metastases (DM), and post-metastases OS (p-OS). Two hundred ninety-four patients (239 LGFMS, 32 SEF, and 23 H-LGFMS/SEF) were identified. At a median(m-) follow-up (FU) of 57.1 months, 12/294 patients died. The 5- and 10-year OS were 99.0% and 95.9% in LGFMS, 86.2% and 67.0% in SEF, and 84.8% and 84.8% in H-LGFMS/SEF, respectively. Predictors of worse OS included pathology, age at surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy. LR developed in 13/294 (4.4%) patients. The observed m-time to LR was 10.7 months. The 5- and 10-yr CCI-LR were 4.7% in LGFMS and 6.6% in SEF, respectively. There were no LR events in H-LGFMS/SEF. The sole predictor of higher risk of LR was histology. DM developed in 23/294 (7.8%) patients. The observed m-time to DM was 28.2 months. The 5- and 10-yr CCI-DM were 1.3% and 2.7% in LGMFS, 29.9% and 57.7% in SEF, 48.9% and 48.9% in H-LGFMS/SEF, respectively. Predictors of higher risk of DM were histology, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy. Primary localized LGFMS treated with complete surgical resection has an excellent prognosis, while about 50% of H-LGFMS/SEF and SEF develop DM within 5 to 10 years. Very long-term FU is needed to understand absolute cure rates.

Soft tissue sarcomas [STSs] are rare tumors of mesodermal origin that arise in diverse tissues such as muscles, fat, and nerves. There are over 100 subtypes of STS, each with distinct clinical behaviors and responses to treatment. Recent advances in treatment have moved towards histology-specific approaches, emphasizing the integration of pathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features to guide treatment. Localized STS is primarily treated with surgery, often supplemented by neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy. However, about half of patients with localized disease will progress to an advanced stage, which is typically managed with systemic therapies including anthracycline-based chemotherapy such as doxorubicin or epirubicin. Despite these treatments, the survival rates for most subtypes of advanced metastatic STS remain relatively low. While anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment, ongoing research into the biology of STSs is enhancing our understanding and approach to these complex tumors with an expansion beyond chemotherapy to include targeted therapy and immunotherapy to improve response rates and survival outcomes. This review focuses on STS other than gastrointestinal stromal tumors [GISTs], examines the current systemic treatment strategies, highlights recent advances, and explores future directions in the systemic therapy of sarcoma patients.

Background: DNA damage response (DDR) pathway alterations contribute to genomic instability and malignant progression in several cancers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed molecular profiles from 5309 sarcoma patient samples, including 746 from pediatric/adolescent and young adults (ped/AYA), encompassing 38 histologic subtypes. The gene expression profiles were further analyzed for immunotherapy-related biomarker associations, including analysis of the T cell-inflamed score. Results: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic DDR alterations were detected in 15.9% (N = 842) of samples overall and 9.25% (N = 69) of Ped/AYA tumors, with mutations occurring most frequently in ATRX (10.1%). Shorter overall survival was observed for patients with DDR-alterations compared to those with DDR-wildtype tumors (Hazard Ratio = 1.172, 95% CI: 1.068–1.287; p < 0.001). In many subtypes, DDR-mutated tumors were found to have increased rates of immune markers, including PD-L1+, dMMR/MSI-high, and TMB. Conclusions: Our study of somatic DDR-pathway mutations provides a better understanding of the molecular associations across sarcoma subtypes that may aid in developing future prognostic and therapeutic options for these rare cancers.

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) facilitate decision-making among subspecialists in the care of oncology patients, but the mechanisms by which they enhance outcomes remain incompletely understood. Our aim was to measure the agreement between sarcoma MTBs and radiology reports’ disease assessment and management recommendations. This single-center IRB-approved retrospective study evaluated cases presented at a weekly sarcoma MTB from 1 August 2020 to 31 July 2021. Cases without clinical notes, imaging studies, or radiology reports were excluded. The data collected included the patient’s clinical status at the time of the MTB, the treatment response assessment by the MTB and radiologists (stable disease; partial response; complete response; progressive disease/recurrence), and the recommendations of the radiology reports and of the MTB. The agreement between the initial radiologist review and MTB on disease assessment and recommendations was analyzed using kappa statistics. In total, 283 cases met the inclusion criteria. Radiology reports provided recommendations in 34.3% of cases, which were adhered to by the ordering providers in 73.2% of cases. The agreement between MTBs and radiology reports was moderate in disease assessment (86.2% agreement; κ = 0.78; p < 0.0001) and negligible in recommendations (36% agreement; κ = 0.18; p < 0.0001). Radiologists were more likely to assign progressive disease/recurrence than MTBs (54.4% vs. 44.4%; p < 0.001) and to recommend short-term imaging follow-up more commonly than MTBs (46.4% vs. 21.7%; p < 0.001). At a tertiary care center, radiologists’ isolated interpretations of imaging findings and management recommendations frequently differ from the MTB’s consensus, reflecting the value of multidisciplinary discussions incorporating the patient’s clinical status and the available treatment options into the final radiographic assessment.