Currently different methods are used for ergonomic assessment and analysis. This review tries to show how motion capture technology is applied in the process of ergonomic assessment. The goals of the analysis were to identify the most adequate method for objective assessment of ergonomics. The results show that the optical motion tracking systems with special software can be used to perform digital analysis of body motion. These systems do not require long set up time, majority of them are portable and the sensors are available in the market for a low cost. Movements of the working person are captured without special clothes equipped with markers. Though the optical systems could be acceptable in a wide range of tasks, they have certain limitations in ergonomic analysis. The performance of optical systems depends on a number of variables such as lighting, type of movements, distance from the object and environmental artefacts. The performance of existing systems is not yet completely reliable, but the technology is on the path of improving its accuracy. There are also other mechanical and magnetic technologies used for ergonomic analysis. This review shows that ergonomic simulations using the motion capture technology significantly improves the quality of ergonomic analysis.
Assess the effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions in patients with CP and to reveal determinant variables of main intervention outcomes: receptive and expressive language. The search was performed in following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid); PubMed (NLM); Embase (Ovid); Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Health Technology Assessment database and PEDro. Full-text and peer-reviewed studies in English studying the effectiveness of AAC in patients with cerebral palsy were included. Studies with patients (<18 years) diagnosed with CP were included. A narrative analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of AAC methods. A random-effects model meta-analysis was used to assess determinants of AAC intervention outcomes. The online database and manual reference search revealed 445 records. Nine studies investigating a total of 294 subjects with CP met predefined eligibility criteria: 4 studies with single subject, multiple baseline research designs, 3 longitudinal cohort studies, 1 case control study and 1 case series. Results revealed moderate-quality evidence that AAC interventions improve the receptive and expressive communication skills in patients with CP. The random-effects model meta-analysis revealed the power of identified determinant variables affecting the AAC intervention outcomes. Diversity of CP patients requires proper analysis of determinant variables to ensure the efficacy of AAC assessment and intervention. More studies of high methodological and practical quality assessing the efficacy of AAC interventions are needed to clarify the evidence.