Background and Objectives: The assessment of cardiac function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is vital due to their high cardiovascular risk. However, contemporary echocardiographic indices and their association with hemodialysis-to-hemodiafiltration transfer are underreported in this population. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 36 ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis-to-hemodiafiltration transfer, with baseline and 3-month post-transfer comprehensive echocardiographic assessments. The key parameters included the global work index, global constructed work, global wasted work (GWW), global work efficiency (GWE), and global longitudinal strain (GLS), with secondary measures from conventional echocardiography. The baseline measures were compared to general population reference values and changes pre- to post-transfer were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: Patients exhibited significant deviations from reference ranges in GWW (179.0 vs. 53.0–122.2 mmHg%), GWE (90.0 vs. 53.0–122.2%), and GLS (−16.0 vs. −24.0–(−16.0)%). Post-transfer left ventricular myocardial work and longitudinal strain remained unchanged (p > 0.05), except for increased GWW (179.0, IQR 148.0–217.0 to 233.5, IQR 159.0-315.0 mmHg%, p = 0.037) and improved mid-inferior peak systolic longitudinal strain ((−17.0, IQR −19.0–(−11.0) to −18.7, IQR −20.0–(−18.0)%, p = 0.016). The enrolled patients also showed higher left atrial diameters, left ventricular volumes, and mass, with impaired systolic function in both ventricles compared to reference values. Conclusions: This study highlights baseline impairments in contemporary echocardiographic measures (GWW, GWE, GLS) in ESRD patients versus reference values, but found no association between hemodialysis-to-hemodiafiltration transfer and most myocardial work and strain parameters.

Anatomic considerations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have an important role for the procedure planning, but sex-specific data are lacking. All eligible cases undergoing evaluation for TAVI procedure in the period from November 2019 to July 2023 at the University Hospital of Split were included. Cardiac computed tomography was analysed to derive the measures of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic root, ascending aorta, and ilio-femoral arteries. Sex-based comparison was conducted using the descriptive statistics. There were 140 female patients (43.8%) and 180 male patients (56.2%). Female patients had smaller dimensions of aortic annulus (area 391.9 vs. 491.5 mm2, p<0.001), LVOT (area 373.3 vs. 481.8 mm2, p<0.001) and ascending aorta (maximal diameter 32.7 vs. 34.5 mm, p<0.001), as well as ilio-femoral arteries bilaterally (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of ilio-femoral unfeasibility for transfemoral TAVI procedure, as measured by diameter of ilio-femoral arteries <5.0 mm (9.0% in males vs. 6.1% in females, p=0.441) and <5.5 mm (24.7% in males vs. 16.7% in females, p=0.156). Female patients were more likely to receive the smallest valve across different valve platforms (p<0.001). There were sex-specific differences in the availability of conventional valve sizes across different platforms (p<0.001). Female patients had significantly higher periprocedural mortality (7.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.030), while there were no differences in other clinical outcomes, and no association of periprocedural mortality with anatomic measures. Female patients showed smaller absolute dimensions of LVOT, aortic root and ilio-femoral arteries compared to male patients. There were no differences in the prevalence of ilio-femoral unfeasibility for transfemoral TAVI procedure, but there were sex-specific differences in the availability of conventional valve sizes across different platforms. Female patients exhibited higher periprocedural mortality with no difference in other clinical outcomes.

There are limited data on the performance of laboratory-derived biomarkers in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with COVID-19. This observational study enrolled 65 KTR with COVID-19 who were treated at the University Hospital of Split up to March 2022. Laboratory-derived biomarkers (neutrophile-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, De Ritis ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-to-hemoglobin ratio, CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio, red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio, platelet-to-albumin ratio, D-Dimer-to-albumin ratio, D-Dimer-to-NLR ratio, LDH-to-albumin ratio, and LDH-to-white blood cell (WBC) ratio) were calculated, and their performance with regard to 30-day mortality was determined. Mortality events occurred in 12 patients (18.5%), which was significantly associated with increased De Ritis (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.57–9.35, p = 0.003), CRP-to-albumin (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13–1.64, p = 0.001), LDH-to-hemoglobin (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07–1.92, p = 0.015), CRP-to-lymphocyte (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.07, p = 0.003), D-dimer-to-albumin (HR 4.94, 95% CI 1.38–7.24, p = 0.038), LDH-to-albumin (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.008), and LDH-to-WBC (HR 1.03 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.024) ratios. Out of these, the best area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were achieved with De Ritis (AUC 0.691), CRP-to-albumin (AUC 0.764), LDH-to-hemoglobin (AUC 0.877), CRP-to-lymphocyte (AUC 0.739), and LDH-to-albumin (AUC 0.827) ratios, while the best discrimination displayed LDH-to-hemoglobin ratio (Harrell’s C 0.808 and Somers’ D 0.616). The overall calibration was satisfactory for all models. Derived laboratory biomarkers such as the de Ritis, CRP-to-albumin, LDH-to-hemoglobin, CRP-to-lymphocyte, and LDH-to-albumin ratios show significant association and discrimination with all-cause mortality in KTR with COVID-19, suggesting its potential risk stratification role.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the specific neurologic biomarkers, neuroimaging findings, and cognitive function in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing electrical cardioversion, compared to control subjects. This cross-sectional study included 25 patients with persistent AF undergoing electrical cardioversion and 16 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light protein (NFL), and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), as well as parameters of neuroimaging and cognitive function, were compared between the groups. Neuroimaging was performed using the standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol. Cognitive function was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Function Index. Further analysis of neurologic biomarkers was performed based on the subsequent electrical cardioversion. There was no significant difference in GFAP (median of 24.7 vs. 28.7 pg/mL, p = 0.347), UCH-L1 (median of 112.8 vs. 117.7 pg/mL, p = 0.885), and NFL (median of 14.2 vs. 15.4 pg/mL, p = 0.886) levels between AF patients and control subjects. Similarly, neuroimaging showed no between-group difference in large cortical and non-cortical lesions (n = 2, 8.0% vs. n = 0, 0.0%, p = 0.246), small non-cortical lesions (n = 5, 20.0% vs. n = 5, 31.3%, p = 0.413), white matter hyperintensity (n = 23, 92.0% vs. n = 14, 87.5%, p = 0.636), and thromboembolic lesions (n = 0, 0.0% vs. n = 1, 6.3%, p = 0.206). Cognitive assessment did not show any between-group difference in the PROMIS index (52.2 ± 9.6 vs. 51.2 ± 6.2, p = 0.706). Finally, there were no significant dynamics in neurologic biomarkers following electrical cardioversion (p > 0.05). This hypothesis-generating study did not find a significant difference in neurologic biomarkers, neuroimaging findings, or cognitive function between patients with persistent AF and controls. The restoration of sinus rhythm was not significantly associated with a change in neurologic biomarkers. Further powered longitudinal studies are needed to re-assess these findings in an AF population.

Background: Timely recognition of high-risk individuals with novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is important. Yet, validated risk scores for kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 are lacking. The present study aimed to externally validate the novel ImAgeS risk score in this population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 65 kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 was conducted. A robust external validation of the novel ImAgeS risk score with respect to 30-day all-cause mortality was performed using regression analysis, discrimination and calibration methods. Results: An overall mortality rate during the study follow-up was 18.5% (N = 12). The ImAgeS risk score showed a statistically significant association with 30-day all-cause mortality (HR 1.04 95% CI 1.00–1.08, p = 0.040). This risk score demonstrated a modest, statistically significant discrimination of all-cause mortality (AUC of 0.679 (95% CI 0.519–0.840, p = 0.027). The calibration of the model was acceptable with a Hosmer-Lemeshow value of 3.74, Harrell’s C concordance index of 0.699 and Somers’ D of 0.397. Conclusions: The ImAgeS risk score demonstrated a significant association with 30-day all-cause mortality in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19. The model showed modest discrimination and satisfactory calibration, confirming the findings from the computational study. Further studies are needed to determine the utility of the ImAgeS score in this high-risk population.