The effect of routine inhalation therapy on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has not been well-defined. This randomized controlled trial included 175 eligible adult patients with COVID-19 who were treated with mechanical ventilation at the University Hospital of Split between October 2020 and June 2021. Patients were randomized and allocated to a control group (no routine inhalation) or one of the treatment arms (inhalation of N-acetylcysteine; 5% saline solution; or 8.4% sodium bicarbonate). The primary outcome was the incidence of VAP, while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality. Routine inhalation therapy had no effect on the incidence of bacterial or fungal VAP nor on all-cause mortality (p > 0.05). Secondary analyses revealed a significant reduction of Gram-positive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) VAP in the treatment groups. Specifically, the bicarbonate group had a statistically significantly lower incidence of Gram-positive bacterial VAP (4.8%), followed by the N-acetylcysteine group (10.3%), 5% saline group (19.0%), and control group (34.6%; p = 0.001). This difference was driven by a lower incidence of MRSA VAP in the bicarbonate group (2.4%), followed by the N-acetylcysteine group (7.7%), 5% saline group (14.3%), and control group (34.6%; p < 0.001). Longer duration of ventilator therapy was the only significant, independent predictor of any bacterial or fungal VAP in the multivariate analysis (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.29, p = 0.038 and aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.10, p = 0.028, respectively). In conclusion, inhalation therapy had no effect on the overall VAP incidence or all-cause mortality. Further studies should explore the secondary findings of this study such as the reduction of Gram-positive or MRSA-caused VAP in treated patients.

Anatomic considerations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have an important role for the procedure planning, but sex-specific data are lacking. All eligible cases undergoing evaluation for TAVI procedure in the period from November 2019 to July 2023 at the University Hospital of Split were included. Cardiac computed tomography was analysed to derive the measures of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic root, ascending aorta, and ilio-femoral arteries. Sex-based comparison was conducted using the descriptive statistics. There were 140 female patients (43.8%) and 180 male patients (56.2%). Female patients had smaller dimensions of aortic annulus (area 391.9 vs. 491.5 mm2, p<0.001), LVOT (area 373.3 vs. 481.8 mm2, p<0.001) and ascending aorta (maximal diameter 32.7 vs. 34.5 mm, p<0.001), as well as ilio-femoral arteries bilaterally (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of ilio-femoral unfeasibility for transfemoral TAVI procedure, as measured by diameter of ilio-femoral arteries <5.0 mm (9.0% in males vs. 6.1% in females, p=0.441) and <5.5 mm (24.7% in males vs. 16.7% in females, p=0.156). Female patients were more likely to receive the smallest valve across different valve platforms (p<0.001). There were sex-specific differences in the availability of conventional valve sizes across different platforms (p<0.001). Female patients had significantly higher periprocedural mortality (7.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.030), while there were no differences in other clinical outcomes, and no association of periprocedural mortality with anatomic measures. Female patients showed smaller absolute dimensions of LVOT, aortic root and ilio-femoral arteries compared to male patients. There were no differences in the prevalence of ilio-femoral unfeasibility for transfemoral TAVI procedure, but there were sex-specific differences in the availability of conventional valve sizes across different platforms. Female patients exhibited higher periprocedural mortality with no difference in other clinical outcomes.

Previous heterogenous studies show conflicting data about sex-based outcomes of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients. This study evaluated 300 NSTE-ACS patients undergoing a coronary angiography between September 2012 and May 2015 that were managed with all-treatment strategies. The sample was stratified by sex and analyzed for the baseline characteristics and outcomes. The main outcome included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which were a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or urgent coronary revascularization. The female patients were older (median of 69.0 vs. 63.0 years, p = 0.008) and had lower values of BMI (median of 26.3 vs. 28.2 kg/m², p < 0.001) and eGFR (76.44 ± 22.43 vs. 94.04 ± 27.91 mL/min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the treatment strategies, angiographic characteristics and discharge therapy between the groups (p > 0.05). The female patients had significantly higher unadjusted rates of ischemic stroke (4.2% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.023), cardiac mortality (11.3%, vs. 3.9%, p = 0.022) and MACCE (33.8%, vs. 19.5%, p = 0.014); female sex was a significant predictor of MACCE in the univariate analysis (HR 1.86, 95%CI 1.12–3.09, p = 0.014); and the cumulative incidence of MACCE was higher in female patients (p = 0.014). After the adjustment, the predictive effect of female sex became non-significant (HR 1.60, 95%CI 0.94–2.73, p = 0.083), while there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of MACCE among the propensity score matched cohort (p = 0.177). Female NSTE-ACS patients have worse long-term outcomes compared to their male counterparts. However, the differences disappear after adjustment and propensity score matching. Continuing efforts and health measures are required to alleviate any sex-based differences in the NSTE-ACS population.

This study presents a case of a successful severed femoral sheath recapture during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). During skin tunneling with a scalpel, the discontinuity of the femoral sheath occurred. Grasping of the distal sheath with the surgical hemostat was attempted unsuccessfully. A proximal part of the severed sheath was removed and Medtronic Sentrant introducer sheath (14 French) was then placed over the existing Confida wire which permanently remained in position, followed by the introduction of the Amplatz Left 2 (AL2) catheter which pushed the severed sheath in the ascending aorta over the Confida wire. The crucial maneuver was the entanglement of the severed sheath in the aortic non-coronary cusp which allowed for its entrapment by the AL2 catheter. This allowed for the coronary guidewire BMW Universal (0.014″) placement and a slow balloon retrieval (SeQuent NEO 2.5 × 25 mm²) of the severed sheath into the introducer sheath. The guidewire/balloon catheter was then exchanged for the support wire (0.035″) followed by the removal of the introducer sheath, AL2 catheter and the severed sheath. In conclusion, sheath severing is a complex accidental event during TAVR, which can be solved by intra-aortic recapture and retraction.