Background/Objectives: Irinotecan is used in monotherapy or combined with other drugs for treating different cancer streams. SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, is 70% inactivated by the uridine diphosphate (UDP) glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) enzyme. The UGT1A1*6 (rs4148323) and *28 (rs3064744) alleles in the gene encoding the enzyme lead to decreased enzyme expression and increased severe irinotecan toxicity. Carrying one or two copies of these alleles results in a UGT1A1 intermediate or poor metabolizer status (IM, PM). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug labels and European Medicines Agency (EMA) European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) for irinotecan recommend dose adjustments based on UGT1A1 genotypes, but only for UGT1A1 PM patients. However, available pharmacogenetic (PGx) dosing guidelines for the UGT1A1–irinotecan interaction lack a consensus about considered genetic variants, genotype-translated phenotypes, and therapeutic recommendations. We aimed to describe evidence regarding the impact of the UGT1A1 genotype in irinotecan toxicity to inform irinotecan-dosing recommendations based on possible UGT1A1 genotypes. Methods: A systematic review was performed to find all the Phase I clinical trials looking for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of irinotecan depending on the UGT1A1 genotype. Results: Toxicity-related events and the MTD of irinotecan differ among UGT1A1 normal metabolizers (NM), IM, and PM patients considering the UGT1A1*28 and/or *6 variants. Conclusions: Dose adjustments might also be recommended for UGT1A1 IM patients (*1/*28 or *1/*6 genotypes), with a 15% dose reduction considered.

Background/Objectives: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) releases SN-38, the same active metabolite as irinotecan, thereby sharing key metabolic pathways and toxicity mechanisms. The clearance of SN-38 is strongly influenced by UGT1A1 polymorphisms, particularly the UGT1A1*28 allele. While UGT1A1*28 genotyping routinely guides irinotecan dosing, no such recommendations exist for SG. This study describes the relationship between UGT1A1*28 and severe SG-related toxicity in real-world practice, identifying early safety signals and exploring the clinical and economic impact. Methods: This retrospective observational study (2021–2025) included patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with SG and patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies treated with irinotecan at a tertiary hospital. In the SG cohort, genotyping followed grade ≥3 toxicity; in the irinotecan cohort, it was performed prospectively. Toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and healthcare costs related to hospitalizations were estimated using official institutional tariffs. Results: All nine SG patients with severe toxicity (100%) carried the UGT1A1*28 allele. In the irinotecan cohort (n = 74), which was managed with genotype-guided dosing, severe toxicity and hospitalization were less frequent. SG was associated with higher mean costs per treated patient (€2817.01 vs. €1233.63), driven by toxicity-related admissions (33.3% vs. 10.8%). Genotyping costs (€10.51) were negligible compared to daily hospitalization expenses (up to €1984.90). Conclusions: Severe SG-related toxicity reveals a consistent UGT1A1*28-associated vulnerability. Given the drug’s recent approval in Spain, these data represent an urgent real-world safety signal. The marked disparity between low genotyping costs and high hospitalization expenses supports implementing preventive UGT1A1 testing to optimize the safety and sustainability of sacituzumab govitecan therapy.

Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are commonly prescribed in many cancer streams. The EMA and FDA-approved drug labels for FPs recommend genotyping the DPYD*2A (rs3918290), *13 (rs55886062), *HapB3 (rs56038477), alleles, and DPYD rs67376798 before treatment starts. We implemented the DPYD genotyping in our daily clinical routine, but we still found patients showing severe adverse drug events (ADEs) to FPs. We studied among these patients the DPYD rs1801265, rs17376848, rs1801159, rs1801160, rs1801158, and rs2297595 as explanatory candidates of the interindividual differences for FP-related toxicities, examining the association with the response to FPs . We also studied the impact of DPYD testing for FP dose tailoring in our clinical practice and characterized the DPYD gene in our population. We found a total acceptance among physicians of therapeutic recommendations translated from the DPYD test, and this dose tailoring does not affect the treatment efficacy. We also found that the DPYD*4 (defined by rs1801158) allele is associated with a higher risk of ADEs (severity grade ≥ 3) in both the univariate (O.R. = 5.66; 95% C.I. = 1.35–23.67; p = 0.014) and multivariate analyses (O.R. = 5.73; 95% C.I. = 1.41–28.77; p = 0.019) among FP-treated patients based on the DPYD genotype. This makes it a candidate variant for implementation in clinical practice.

This study investigates the effect of daily consumption of a concentrated garlic and onion extract on COVID-19 symptoms among elderly nursing home residents. Volunteers consumed a daily capsule of the concentrated powder rich in organosulfur compounds over 36 weeks during lunch. The incidence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms between the treatment and control groups were compared, along with monitoring the safety of consumption, incidence of other diseases, and medicine usage. The treatment group showed a significant reduction in both the number and severity of COVID-19 symptoms compared to the control group, with no significant adverse effects observed. No significant reduction in symptom duration was detected. This study provides preliminary evidence that concentrated garlic and onion extract may aid in the treatment of COVID-19 among older adults. These findings suggest potential public health benefits, emphasizing the need for further research to explore the immunomodulatory properties of these natural compounds.

Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are commonly prescribed in many cancer streams. The DPYD*2A (rs3918290), *13 (rs55886062), *HapB3 (rs56038477), alleles, and DPYD rs67376798, had shown the highest level of evidence about their association with FPs response. The EMA and FDA-approved drug labels for FPs, recommend genotyping these variants before treatment starts. We implemented the DPYD genotyping in our daily clinical routine, but we still find patients showing severe adverse drug events (ADEs) to FPs. We studied among these patients the association with the response to FPs of DPYD rs1801265, rs17376848, rs1801159, rs1801160, rs1801158, and rs2297595; as explanatory candidates of the interindividual differences for the FP-related toxicities. We also studied the impact of DPYD*2A, *13, *HapB3, and rs67376798 genotype for FP dose tailoring in our clinical practice and characterized the DPYD gene in our population. We found that FP dose lowering based on DPYD genotype does not affect the treatment efficacy. Also, the DPYD*4 (defined by rs1801158) allele was associated with a higher risk of ADEs (severity grade ≥ 3) in both the univariate (O.R.= 5.66; 95% C.I.= 1.35 – 23.67; p= 0.014) and multivariate analyses (O.R.= 5.73; 95% C.I.= 1.41 – 28.77; p= 0.019). This makes it a candidate variant for implementation in clinical practice.

The growing global threat of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria has been exacerbated by inadequate antibiotic consumption and the difficulty in developing new therapeutic strategies. Selective Digestive Decontamination (SDD) is presented as an encouraging measure to prevent the appearance and colonization of MDR bacteria. We compared the pattern of antibiotic consumption in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of our hospital before and after the implementation of the SDD protocol. This quasi-experimental study was conducted in an ICU from June-2021 to June-2023. The incidence of nosocomial infections, colonizations, and the number of isolated MDR bacteria, as well as the defined-daily-dose (DDD), were monitored. A total of 3266 patients were included, with 1532 in the pre-intervention group and 1734 in the post-intervention group. The median age was 62 years, 66% were male, and the average APACHE II and SOFA scores were 15 and 6.5, respectively. There was a significant reduction in overall antibiotic consumption in the post-SDD group (p= 0.028), highlighting a decrease in Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) (p= 0.0099). There was also a reduction in colonization incidence density and nosocomial infections. Implementing the SDD protocol significantly reduced antibiotic consumption in the ICU, suggesting important implications for infection control and antimicrobial resistance management.