Valentina Antonelli

Dr. Valentina Antonelli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 August 2024 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAntonio Mazzarelli
Antonio Mazzarelli
CNcarla nisii
carla nisii
ACAngela Cannas
Angela Cannas
AVAntonella Vulcano
Antonella Vulcano
BBBarbara Bartolini
Barbara Bartolini
CFCarla Fontana
Carla Fontana
Background: The treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections is challenging because of the difficulty in obtaining phenotypic (pDST) and/or molecular (mDST) drug susceptibility testing and the need of a multi-drug regimen. Objectives: The objective was to describe the in vitro susceptibility patterns of various NTM species through an analysis of susceptibility results obtained on isolates collected between 2018 and 2023. Methods: Species identification and mutations in rrs or rrl genes (mDST) were identified by a line probe assay, while the pDST was performed by broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI criteria. Results: We analysed 337 isolates of NTM belonging to 15 species/subspecies. The Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) was the most common (62%); other species identified included M. gordonae (11%), M. kansasii (5%), the M. abscessus complex (8%), M. chelonae (6%), and M. fortuitum (2%). The results of pDST (claritromycin and amikacin) and mDST (rrl and rrs genes) on 66 NTM strains showed that while wild-type rrl and rrs occurred in 86.3% and 94% strains, respectively, the pDST showed 88% sensitivity for clarithromycin and 57.5% for amikacin. The main incongruity was observed for macrolides. Conclusions: Most NTM are likely to be susceptible to macrolides and aminoglycosides. The molecular identification of resistant genotypes is accurate and strongly recommended for optimal patient management.

5 November 2024 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRClaudia Rotondo
Claudia Rotondo
CVCarolina Venditti
Carolina Venditti
OBOrnella Butera
Ornella Butera
VDValentina Dimartino
Valentina Dimartino
FMFrancesco Messina
Francesco Messina
OGon behalf of the Lazio Region Laboratory Study Group
on behalf of the Lazio Region Laboratory Study Group
Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance represents a challenge to public health systems because of the array of resistance and virulence mechanisms that lead to treatment failure and increased mortality rates. Although for years the main driver of carbapenem resistance in Italy has been the Klebsiella pneumoniae KPC carbapenemase, recent years have seen an increase in VIM and NDM metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs). We conducted a five-year survey of New Delhi Metallo-beta-Lactamase (NDM)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-Kpn) clinical isolates from the Lazio region, Italy; the study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underpinning their resistant and virulent phenotype. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by automated systems and broth microdilution. In silico analysis of acquired resistance and virulence genes was performed using whole-genome sequencing (WGS), molecular typing through MLST, and core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST). Conclusions: A total of 126 clinical NDM-Kpn isolates were collected from 19 distinct hospitals in the Lazio region. Molecular analysis highlighted the existence of NDM-1 (108/126) and NDM-5 (18/126) variants, 18 Sequence Types (STs), and 15 Cluster Types (CTs). Notably, 31/126 isolates displayed a virulence score of 4, carrying ybt, ICEKp, iuc, and rmp genes. This study identified a variety of NDM-Kpn STs, mainly carrying the blaNDM-1 gene, with a significant number linked to high-risk clones. Of these isolates, 24.6% showed high-level resistance and virulence, emphasizing the risk of the spread of strains that combine multi-drug-resistance (MDR) and virulence. Proactive surveillance and international collaborations are needed to prevent the spread of high-risk clones, as well as further research into new antimicrobial agents to fight antibiotic resistance.

4 August 2025 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRClaudia Rotondo
Claudia Rotondo
VAValentina Antonelli
Valentina Antonelli
ARAlberto Rossi
Alberto Rossi
SDSilvia D'Arezzo
Silvia D'Arezzo
MSMarina Selleri
Marina Selleri
CFCarla Fontana
Carla Fontana
Background/Objectives: Enterococci, particularly Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, are Gram-positive cocci that can cause severe infections in hospitalized patients. The rise of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and vancomycin-variable enterococci (VVE) poses significant challenges in healthcare settings due to their resistance to multiple antibiotics. Methods: We conducted a point prevalence survey (PPS) to assess the prevalence of VRE and VVE colonization in hospitalized patients. Rectal swabs were collected from 160 patients and analyzed using molecular assays (MAs) and culture. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and core-genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) were performed to identify the genetic diversity. Results: Of the 160 rectal swabs collected, 54 (33.7%) tested positive for the vanA and/or vanB genes. Culture-based methods identified 47 positive samples (29.3%); of these, 44 isolates were identified as E. faecium and 3 as E. faecalis. Based on the resistance profiles, 35 isolates (74.5%) were classified as VRE, while 12 (25.5%) were classified as VVE. WGS and cgMLST analyses identified seven clusters of E. faecium, with sequence type (ST) 80 being the most prevalent. Various resistance genes and virulence factors were identified, and this study also highlighted intra- and inter-ward transmission of VRE strains. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the potential for virulence and resistance of both the VRE and VVE strains, and they highlight the importance of effective infection control measures to prevent their spread. VVE in particular should be carefully monitored as they often escape detection. Integrating molecular data with clinical information will hopefully enhance our ability to predict and prevent future VRE infections.

4 May 2026 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAlessandro Capone
Alessandro Capone
FGFrancesca Gavaruzzi
Francesca Gavaruzzi
VAValentina Antonelli
Valentina Antonelli
CRClaudia Rotondo
Claudia Rotondo
SMSamir Al Moghazi
Samir Al Moghazi
SCStefania Cicalini
Stefania Cicalini
Pneumonia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with bacterial pathogens contributing significantly to its burden. While Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii complex are well-recognized non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) causing severe pneumonia, particularly in healthcare settings, an expanding array of other, rarer NFGNB species is increasingly implicated. These species include, but are not limited to, Achromobacter spp., Ochrobactrum spp., Burkholderia spp., Aeromonas spp., Roseomonas spp., Elizabethkingia spp., Chryseobacterium spp. Alcaligenes spp., Ralstonia spp., Cupriavidus spp., Sphingomonas spp., Rhizobium spp., Empedobacter spp., and Brevundimonas spp. In this article we aim to provide a focused review of the contemporary epidemiology and specific risk factors for pneumonia caused by this diverse group of rare NFGNB, explicitly excluding P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and A. baumannii. We seek to delineate the emerging patterns of pneumonia associated with Achromobacter spp., Burkholderia spp., Aeromonas spp., Roseomonas spp., Elizabethkingia spp., Pandoraea spp., Sphingomonas spp., and K. gyiorum. Moreover, we discuss antimicrobial treatment strategies for pneumonia caused by rarer NFGNB including Ochrobactrum spp., Chryseobacterium spp., Alcaligenes spp., Ralstonia spp., Cupriavidus spp., Rhizobium spp., Empedobacter spp., and Brevundimonas spp. A deeper understanding of these specific epidemiological trends and risk factors is important for guiding precise diagnostic approaches, informing antimicrobial stewardship programs, and developing targeted infection prevention and control strategies with the aim of mitigating the impact of these challenging pathogens in the clinical setting.

4 May 2026 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABArianna Basile
Arianna Basile
VAValentina Antonelli
Valentina Antonelli
CRClaudia Rotondo
Claudia Rotondo
MPMichele Properzi
Michele Properzi
FMFrancesco Messina
Francesco Messina
CFCarla Fontana
Carla Fontana
Background/Objectives: Acinetobacter baumannii is a critical opportunistic pathogen causing severe healthcare-associated infections, particularly in intensive care units. The global dissemination of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) and its environmental persistence necessitate continuous genomic surveillance to monitor high-risk clones. Methods: We conducted whole-genome sequencing (WGS), core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST), and phylogenomic analyses on 26 CRAB isolates collected at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases (INMI) “Lazzaro Spallanzani” IRCCS (September 2023–September 2024). Antimicrobial resistance determinants, virulence-related genes, and capsular (KL) and lipooligosaccharide outer core (OCL) loci were characterized by interrogation of comprehensive bioinformatic pipelines. Results: All CRAB isolates displayed an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotype, with a shared resistance pattern to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin, and sulfonamides, while being susceptible only to colistin and cefiderocol. The carbapenemase gene blaOXA-23 was detected in all CRAB isolates, together with clone-specific blaOXA-51-like variants. For all isolates, the resistome profile fully matched the observed resistance phenotype. All isolates belonged to the International Clonal Lineage II (ICL II), Pasteur Sequence Type (ST) 2, and Oxford ST369, ST208, and ST455. Integration of cgMLST data with phylogenomic analyses and genome-based classification of KL and OCL loci revealed five distinct clusters, each one including nearly identical isolates, indicating both intra-hospital dissemination and possible inter-hospital transmission. Virulome profiling revealed heterogeneous repertoires of virulence-associated genes, resulting in cluster-specific patterns, while patristic analysis identified phylogenetic clusters linking the study isolates to other Italian and other European lineages. Conclusions: This study underscores the complex genomic landscape of CRAB in our setting, driven by the circulation of different ICL II clonal types, and reinforces the urgency of integrated genomic surveillance and robust antimicrobial stewardship to mitigate the spread of high-risk XDR A. baumannii clones.