Aim of this review is to focus the attention on people living with HIV infection at risk of developing a cardiovascular event. What is or what would be the most suitable antiretroviral therapy? Which statin or fibrate to reduce the risk? How to influence behavior and lifestyles? Prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains the first and essential step in a medical intervention on these patients. The lifestyle modification, including smoking cessation, increased physical activity, weight reduction, and the education on healthy dietary practices are the main instruments. Statins are the cornerstone for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. They have been shown to slow the progression or promote regression of coronary plaque, and could also exert an anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effect. However the current guidelines for the use of these drugs in general population are dissimilar, with important differences between American and European ones. The debate between American and European guidelines is still open and, also considering the independent risk factor represented by HIV, specific guidelines are warranted. Ezetimibe reduces the intestinal absorption of cholesterol. It is effective alone or in combination with rosuvastatin. It does not modify plasmatic concentrations of antiretrovirals. A number of experimental new classes of drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia are being studied. Fibrates represent the first choice for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia, however, the renal toxicity of fibrates and statins should be considered. Omega 3 fatty acids have a good safety profile, but their efficacy is limited. Another concern is the high dose needed. Other drugs are acipimox and tesamorelin. Current antiretroviral therapies are less toxic and more effective than regimens used in the early years. Lipodistrophy and dyslipidemia are the main causes of long-term toxicities. Not all antiretrovirals have similar toxicities. Protease Inhibitors may cause dyslipidemia and lipodystrophy, while integrase inhibitors have a minimal impact on lipids profile, and no evidence of lipodystrophy. There is still much to be written with the introduction of new drugs in clinical practice. Cardiovascular risk among HIV infected patients, interventions on behavior and lifestyles, use of drugs to reduce the risk, and switch in antiretroviral therapy, remain nowadays major issues in the management of HIV-infected patients.

In recent years, the pathogenic role of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the clinical manifestations of HIV-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (HIV-PAH), which currently represents one of the most severe complications of HIV infection, have received more attention HIV-PAH occurs at all stages of the disease, and does not seem to be related to the degree of immune deficiency. Many of the symptoms in HIV-PAH result from right ventricular dysfunction: the first clinical manifestation is effort intolerance and exertional dyspnoea that will progress to the point of breathlessness at rest. Echocardiography is an extremely useful tool for the diagnosis of HIV-PAH, and Doppler echocardiography can be used to estimate systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Assessment of haemodynamic measures by catheterization remains, however, the best test for evaluating the response to therapy. Cardiac catheterization is mandatory to definitively diagnose the disease and exclude any underlying cardiac shunt as the aetiology. Recently, effective therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have been available, including prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, allowing amelioration of symptoms and a better prognosis. However, HIV-PAH remains a progressive disease for which treatment is often unsatisfactory and there is no cure. As new efficient antiretroviral treatment is introduced, clinicians should expect to encounter an increasing number of cases of PAH in HIV-infected patients in the future.

Cigarette smoking is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in the general population, and is a well-recognized risk factor for a variety of serious clinical conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary diseases and cancers.

We evaluated virological response and resistance profiles in individuals who were virologically suppressed who switched to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in real life. Survival analysis was used to assess probability of virological rebound (VR). Cumulative major resistance mutations (MRM) and cumulative genotypic susceptibility score (cGSS) were evaluated before the switch. Overall, 283 individuals virologically suppressed for a median (interquartile [IQR]) time of 7 (3-9) y were analyzed. Of these, 20.8% were in first-line treatment, 13.1% were highly treatment-experienced (HTE), and 8.5% had experienced previous integrase inhibitor (INI)-failures. Before the switch, nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor NRTI MRM prevalence was 29% (M184V:13.8%; any thymidine analogue mutation: 14.1%; K65R: 0.7%; K70E 0.4%); only three (2.1%) individuals showed INI major resistance mutations (Y143C/H/R [n = 1]; Y143C [n = 1]; N155H [n = 1]), and 82.0% of individuals received fully active B/F/TAF. Ninety-six wk after switch, the probability of VR was 5%, with only 12 events of VR at a median (IQR) viremia level of 284 (187-980) copies/mL, mainly transient. No significant associations between virological outcomes and genotypic susceptibility to B/F/TAF were observed. People who experienced previous INI failures showed a significantly higher adjusted hazard ratio (AHR [95% CI]) to experience VR under B/F/TAF (3.9 [1.1-13.4], P = 0.031). This AHR increased in people who experienced INI failures and received partially active B/F/TAF (5.5 [1.4-21.1], P = 0.013). Within 96 wk, a switch to B/F/TAF in individuals who were virologically suppressed ensured a very high rate of virological control in a clinical setting. Previous resistance alone did not affect B/F/TAF response. However, people who had previous INI failures were more prone to losing virological control under B/F/TAF.

The aim was to measure neutralizing antibody levels against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) variant in serum samples obtained from vaccinated PLWH and healthcare workers (HCW) and compare them with those against the Wuhan-D614G (W-D614G) strain, before and after the third dose of a mRNA vaccine. We included 106 PLWH and 28 HCWs, for a total of 134 participants. Before the third dose, the proportion of participants with undetectable nAbsT against BA.1 was 88% in the PLWH low CD4 nadir group, 80% in the high nadir group and 100% in the HCW. Before the third dose, the proportion of participants with detectable nAbsT against BA.1 was 12% in the PLWH low nadir group, 20% in the high nadir group and 0% in HCW, respectively. After 2 weeks from the third dose, 89% of the PLWH in the low nadir group, 100% in the high nadir group and 96% of HCW elicited detectable nAbsT against BA.1. After the third dose, the mean log2 nAbsT against BA.1 in the HCW and PLWH with a high nadir group was lower than that seen against W-D614G (6.1 log2 (±1.8) vs. 7.9 (±1.1) and 6.4 (±1.3) vs. 8.6 (±0.8)), respectively. We found no evidence of a different level of nAbsT neutralization by BA.1 vs. W-D614G between PLWH with a high CD4 nadir and HCW (0.40 (−1.64, 2.43); p = 0.703). Interestingly, in PLWH with a low CD4 nadir, the mean log2 difference between nAbsT against BA.1 and W-D614G was smaller in those with current CD4 counts 201–500 vs. those with CD4 counts < 200 cells/mm³ (−0.80 (−1.52, −0.08); p = 0.029), suggesting that in this target population with a low CD4 nadir, current CD4 count might play a role in diversifying the level of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization.

To investigate immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine third booster dose (3BD; fifth dose) with bivalent vaccine original/BA4/5 vaccine in people living with HIV (PLWH). This is an observational cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (HIV-VAC study). We analyzed microneutralization assay and interferon-γ production in 48 PLWH on antiretroviral therapy with clusters of differentiation (CD4) count <200 cell/mm³ and/or previous AIDS according to immunization status: vaccinated PLWH who had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (hybrid immunization, HI) vs those only vaccinated (non-hybrid immunization, nHI) and current CD4 count. After 15 days from its administration (T1), the 3BD bivalent messenger RNA vaccine elicited a statistically significant increase of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) geometric mean titers from T0 to T1 against W-D614G (fold increase 4.8; P <0.0001), BA.5 (8.6 P <0.0001), BQ.1.1 (6.4, P <0.0001) and XBB.1 (6.5, P <0.0001). When compared to BA.5, nAbs geometric mean titers against BQ.1.1 and XBB.1 decreased by 3.5 and 4.1-fold, respectively. After controlling for age, years from AIDS diagnosis, CD4 count at administration and CD4 count nadir, the fold change reduction in nAbs response to other variants of concerns as compared to BA.1, was larger in participants with HI vs those nHI: 0.59 lower (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.97, P = 0.04) for BQ.1.1 and 0.67 lower (95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.96, P = 0.03) for XBB.1. In contrast, the analysis carried little evidence for an association between current CD4 count and response to the fifth dose of bivalent vaccine. Furthermore, cell-mediated immunity remained stable. Our data support the current recommendation of offering bivalent mRNA vaccine booster doses to PLWH with low CD4 count or previous AIDS at first vaccination, especially in those who never previously acquired SARS-CoV-2 and regardless of current CD4 count.