Ryo Asaoka

Dr. Ryo Asaoka


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2019 in American Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARyo Asaoka
Ryo Asaoka
HMHiroshi Murata
Hiroshi Murata
KHKazunori Hirasawa
Kazunori Hirasawa
YFYuri Fujino
Yuri Fujino
MMMasato Matsuura
Masato Matsuura
MAMakoto Araie
Makoto Araie

1 September 2016 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARyo Asaoka
Ryo Asaoka
HMHiroshi Murata
Hiroshi Murata
AIAiko Iwase
Aiko Iwase
MAMakoto Araie
Makoto Araie

2 October 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNaoto Shibata
Naoto Shibata
MTMasaki Tanito
Masaki Tanito
KMKeita Mitsuhashi
Keita Mitsuhashi
YFYuri Fujino
Yuri Fujino
MMMasato Matsuura
Masato Matsuura
RARyo Asaoka
Ryo Asaoka
The Purpose of the study was to develop a deep residual learning algorithm to screen for glaucoma from fundus photography and measure its diagnostic performance compared to Residents in Ophthalmology. A training dataset consisted of 1,364 color fundus photographs with glaucomatous indications and 1,768 color fundus photographs without glaucomatous features. A testing dataset consisted of 60 eyes of 60 glaucoma patients and 50 eyes of 50 normal subjects. Using the training dataset, a deep learning algorithm known as Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition (ResNet) was developed to discriminate glaucoma, and its diagnostic accuracy was validated in the testing dataset, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC). The Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition was constructed using the training dataset and validated using the testing dataset. The presence of glaucoma in the testing dataset was also confirmed by three Residents in Ophthalmology. The deep learning algorithm achieved significantly higher diagnostic performance compared to Residents in Ophthalmology; with ResNet, the AROC from all testing data was 96.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.5 to 99.6)% while the AROCs obtained by the three Residents were between 72.6% and 91.2%.

8 March 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHiroshi Murata
Hiroshi Murata
HHHiroyo Hirasawa
Hiroyo Hirasawa
YAYuka Aoyama
Yuka Aoyama
KSKenji Sugisaki
Kenji Sugisaki
MAMakoto Araie
Makoto Araie
RARyo Asaoka
Ryo Asaoka
The purpose of this study was to create a vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) prediction system to identify visual field (VF) test points associated with decreased VRQoL in patients with glaucoma. VRQoL score was surveyed in 164 patients with glaucoma using the ‘Sumi questionnaire’. A binocular VF was created from monocular VFs by using the integrated VF (IVF) method. VRQoL score was predicted using the ‘Random Forest’ method, based on visual acuity (VA) of better and worse eyes (better-eye and worse-eye VA) and total deviation (TD) values from the IVF. For comparison, VRQoL scores were regressed (linear regression) against: (i) mean of TD (IVF MD); (ii) better-eye VA; (iii) worse-eye VA; and (iv) IVF MD and better- and worse-eye VAs. The rank of importance of IVF test points was identified using the Random Forest method. The root mean of squared prediction error associated with the Random Forest method (0.30 to 1.97) was significantly smaller than those with linear regression models (0.34 to 3.38, p<0.05, ten-fold cross validation test). Worse-eye VA was the most important variable in all VRQoL tasks. In general, important VF test points were concentrated along the horizontal meridian. Particular areas of the IVF were important for different tasks: peripheral superior and inferior areas in the left hemifield for the ‘letters and sentences’ task, peripheral, mid-peripheral and para-central inferior regions for the ‘walking’ task, the peripheral superior region for the ‘going out’ task, and a broad scattered area across the IVF for the ‘dining’ task. The VRQoL prediction model with the Random Forest method enables clinicians to better understand patients’ VRQoL based on standard clinical measurements of VA and VF.

20 October 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RARyo Asaoka
Ryo Asaoka
SNShunsuke Nakakura
Shunsuke Nakakura
HTHitoshi Tabuchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
HMHiroshi Murata
Hiroshi Murata
YNYoshitaka Nakao
Yoshitaka Nakao
YKYoshiaki Kiuchi
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
The purpose of the study was to investigate the correlation between Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST tonometry: CST) parameters and various other ocular parameters, including intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometry. IOP with Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-G), central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), corneal curvature, and CST parameters were measured in 94 eyes of 94 normal subjects. The relationship between ten CST parameters against age, gender, IOP-G, AL, CST-determined CCT and average corneal curvature was investigated using linear modeling. In addition, the relationship between IOP-G versus CST-determined CCT, AL, and other CST parameters was also investigated using linear modeling. Linear modeling showed that the CST measurement ‘A time-1’ is dependent on IOP-G, age, AL, and average corneal curvature; ‘A length-1’ depends on age and average corneal curvature; ‘A velocity-1’ depends on IOP-G and AL; ‘A time-2’ depends on IOP-G, age, and AL; ‘A length-2’ depends on CCT; ‘A velocity-2’ depends on IOP-G, age, AL, CCT, and average corneal curvature; ‘peak distance’ depends on gender; ‘maximum deformation amplitude’ depends on IOP-G, age, and AL. In the optimal model for IOP-G, A time-1, A velocity-1, and highest concavity curvature, but not CCT, were selected as the most important explanatory variables. In conclusion, many CST parameters were not significantly related to CCT, but IOP usually was a significant predictor, suggesting that an adjustment should be made to improve their usefulness for clinical investigations. It was also suggested CST parameters were more influential for IOP-G than CCT and average corneal curvature.

1 April 2016 in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YFYuri Fujino
Yuri Fujino
RARyo Asaoka
Ryo Asaoka
HMHiroshi Murata
Hiroshi Murata
AMAtsuya Miki
Atsuya Miki
MTMasaki Tanito
Masaki Tanito
OGon behalf of the Japanese Archive of Multicentral Databases in Glaucoma (JAMDIG) Construction Group
on behalf of the Japanese Archive of Multicentral Databases in Glaucoma (JAMDIG) Construction Group
Purpose: To develop a large-scale real clinical database of glaucoma (Japanese Archive of Multicentral Databases in Glaucoma: JAMDIG) and to investigate the effect of treatment. Methods: The study included a total of 1348 eyes of 805 primary open-angle glaucoma patients with 10 visual fields (VFs) measured with 24-2 or 30-2 Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) records in 10 institutes in Japan. Those with 10 reliable VFs were further identified (638 eyes of 417 patients). Mean total deviation (mTD) of the 52 test points in the 24-2 HFA VF was calculated, and the relationship between mTD progression rate and seven variables (age, mTD of baseline VF, average IOP, standard deviation (SD) of IOP, previous argon/selective laser trabeculoplasties (ALT/SLT), previous trabeculectomy, and previous trabeculotomy) was analyzed. Results: The mTD in the initial VF was −6.9 ± 6.2 dB and the mTD progression rate was −0.26 ± 0.46 dB/year. Mean IOP during the follow-up period was 13.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg. Age and SD of IOP were related to mTD progression rate. However, in eyes with average IOP below 15 and also 13 mm Hg, only age and baseline VF mTD were related to mTD progression rate. Conclusions: Age and the degree of VF damage were related to future progression. Average IOP was not related to the progression rate; however, fluctuation of IOP was associated with faster progression, although this was not the case when average IOP was below 15 mm Hg.