Livio Finos

Dr. Livio Finos

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2004 in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGiovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava
CRchiara Ruini
chiara Ruini
CRChiara Rafanelli
Chiara Rafanelli
Livio FinosLivio Finos
Livio Finos
LSLuigi Salmaso
Luigi Salmaso
SSSaulo Sirigatti
Saulo Sirigatti
Background: There is increasing awareness that the goal of treatment in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) should not simply be a response, but restoration of normal function. The aim of this study was to apply a novel psychotherapeutic approach for increasing the level of remission in GAD. Methods: Twenty patients with DSM-IV GAD devoid of comorbid conditions were randomly assigned to 8 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or the sequential administration of 4 sessions of CBT followed by other 4 sessions of well-being therapy (WBT). Assessment methods included the Anxiety and Depression Scales of Paykel’s Clinical Interview for Depression, Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scales and Kellner’s Symptom Questionnaire. A one-year follow-up was undertaken. Results: Significant advantages of the CBT-WBT sequential combination over CBT only were observed with both observer and self-rated methods after treatment. Such gains were maintained at follow-up. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest the feasibility and clinical advantages of adding WBT to the treatment of GAD. They lend support to a sequential use of treatment components for achieving a more sustained recovery.

27 March 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Valerio MatozzoValerio Matozzo
Valerio Matozzo
ACAndrea Chinellato
Andrea Chinellato
Marco MunariMarco Munari
Marco Munari
Livio FinosLivio Finos
Livio Finos
MBMonica Bressan
Monica Bressan
Maria Gabriella MarinMaria Gabriella Marin
Maria Gabriella Marin
Water acidification, temperature increases and changes in seawater salinity are predicted to occur in the near future. In such a global climate change (GCC) scenario, there is growing concern for the health status of both wild and farmed organisms. Bivalve molluscs, an important component of coastal marine ecosystems, are at risk. At the immunological level, the ability of an organism to maintain its immunosurveillance unaltered under adverse environmental conditions may enhance its survival capability. To our knowledge, only a few studies have investigated the effects of changing environmental parameters (as predicted in a GCC scenario) on the immune responses of bivalves. In the present study, the effects of both decreased pH values and increased temperature on the important immune parameters of two bivalve species were evaluated for the first time. The clam Chamelea gallina and the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis, widespread along the coast of the Northwestern Adriatic Sea, were chosen as model organisms. Bivalves were exposed for 7 days to three pH values (8.1, 7.7 and 7.4) at two temperatures (22 and 28°C). Three independent experiments were carried out at salinities of 28, 34 and 40 PSU. The total haemocyte count, Neutral Red uptake, haemolymph lysozyme activity and total protein levels were measured. The results obtained demonstrated that tested experimental conditions affected significantly most of the immune parameters measured in bivalves, even if the variation pattern of haemocyte responses was not always linear. Between the two species, C. gallina appeared more vulnerable to changing pH and temperature than M. galloprovincialis. Overall, this study demonstrated that climate changes can strongly affect haemocyte functionality in bivalves. However, further studies are needed to clarify better the mechanisms of action of changing environmental parameters, both individually and in combination, on bivalve haemocytes.

29 September 2011 in Genes & Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SJS A Joosten
S A Joosten
JGJ J Goeman
J J Goeman
JSJ S Sutherland
J S Sutherland
LOL Opmeer
L Opmeer
KBK G de Boer
K G de Boer
MHM C Haks
M C Haks

1 August 2014 in Marine Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBM. Bressan
M. Bressan
ACA. Chinellato
A. Chinellato
Marco MunariMarco Munari
Marco Munari
Valerio MatozzoValerio Matozzo
Valerio Matozzo
AMA. Manci
A. Manci
Maria Gabriella MarinMaria Gabriella Marin
Maria Gabriella Marin

1 November 2018 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJonathan D. Rosenblatt
Jonathan D. Rosenblatt
Livio FinosLivio Finos
Livio Finos
WWWouter D. Weeda
Wouter D. Weeda
ASAldo Solari
Aldo Solari
JGJelle J. Goeman
Jelle J. Goeman

9 October 2003 in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRChiara Rafanelli
Chiara Rafanelli
RRRenzo Roncuzzi
Renzo Roncuzzi
Livio FinosLivio Finos
Livio Finos
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
ETElena Tomba
Elena Tomba
GFGiovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava
Background: While there has been an upsurge of interest in the psychiatric correlates of myocardial infarction, little is known about the presence of psychological distress in the setting of cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: A consecutive series of 61 patients with recent myocardial infarction who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation program was evaluated by means of both observer-rated (DSM and DCPR) and self-rated (Psychosocial Index) methods. A follow-up of this patient population was undertaken (median = 2 years). Survival analysis was used to characterize the clinical course of patients. Results: Twenty percent of patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis (in half of the cases minor depression). An additional 30% of patients presented with a DCPR cluster, such as type A behavior and irritable mood. Only high levels of self-perceived stressful life circumstances and psychological distress approached statistical significance as a psychological risk factor for cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. Conclusions: Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation needs to incorporate both clinical (DSM) and subclinical (DCPR) methods of classification. Type A behavior was present in about a quarter of patients and can be studied in specific subgroups of cardiovascular patients defined by DCPR.