Pork head meat may harbor Salmonella and contaminate other carcass by-products during harvest and fabrication. A large pork processing plant in the United States was sampled bimonthly for 11 months to determine the concentration, prevalence, seasonality, serotype diversity, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica isolated from cheek meat and head trim of swine carcasses. Each collection consisted of 25 samples on two consecutive days in the morning and afternoon shifts, for a total of 100 cheek meat and 100 head trim samples each month. Tissues were cultured for Salmonella by using restrictive media and enrichment techniques, and a subset of isolates was serotyped, analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility, and genome sequenced. Salmonella postenrichment prevalence did not differ (P = 0.20) between cheek meat (63%) and head trim (66%). Postenrichment prevalence differed (P < 0.05) by month (January, 94%; March, 80%; May, 54%; July, 59%; September, 47%; and November, 55%) and by processing shift (morning, 68%; afternoon, 62%). The subset (n = 618) of isolates selected for serotyping yielded 21 distinct serotypes: Typhimurium (49%), Infantis (10%), Heidelberg (8%), I 4,[5],12:i:− (8%), and 17 other types (≤5%). In total, 407 multidrug-resistant (MDR; resistance to three or more antibiotic classes) isolates were identified. There were 120 isolates that exhibited the penta-resistant ACSSuT phenotype. In addition, 113 isolates exhibited decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (MIC ≥ 0.12 μg/mL). Resistance genes blaCARB, blaSHV, blaTEM, aac(6′)-Ib-cr,qnrB, sul2, and dfrA were expressed in numerous MDR Salmonella isolates. The data herein suggest that pork products from the head, compared with data reported for carcasses, may have a relatively high prevalence of Salmonella with diverse serotypes and MDR.HIGHLIGHTSCharacteristics of Salmonella in pork cheek meat and head trim were examined.Salmonella prevalence was 63% in pork cheek and 66% head meat for ground product.Multidrug resistance (MDR) was found in 67% of tested isolates.Distinct serotypes (21) were identified, predominantly Typhimurium and Infantis.Pork cheek meat and head trim should be closely monitored for MDR Salmonella.

Pork carcasses and meat may harbor Salmonella and may contaminate other products during harvest and fabrication. Sources of contamination include manure on hides, environmental contamination, ingredients from external sources, and lymph nodes. Swine lymph nodes are often incorporated into ground meat, as their anatomical location makes removal labor prohibitive. A sausage processing plant in the midwestern United States was sampled monthly (except for December) from May 2021 to April 2022 to enumerate Salmonella and Enterobacteriaceae (EB) throughout the sausage manufacturing process to determine high-risk stages and efficiency of existing in-plant interventions. Salmonella serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility were evaluated on a subset of isolates recovered at the end phases of sausage production. In each collection, samples were taken from the carcasses of eight sows through 11 stages of sausage manufacturing. A total of 830 samples were cultured. Thirty-four Salmonella were isolated from the final three production stages; of these, there were eleven serotypes. Three isolates displayed resistance to ampicillin, whereas the remainder of the isolates were pan-susceptible to the antimicrobials tested. Salmonella and EB were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) by acid washes at different stages of production, and the results point to the beneficial effects of interventions to lessen Salmonella concentrations in retail products.

Indicator traits associated with disease resiliency would be useful to improve the health and welfare of feedlot cattle. A post hoc analysis of data collected previously ( Kayser et al., 2019a) was conducted to investigate differences in immunologic, physiologic, and behavioral responses of steers (N = 36, initial BW = 386 ± 24 kg) that had differential haptoglobin (HPT) responses to an experimentally induced challenge with Mannheimia haemolytica (MH). Rumen temperature, DMI, and feeding behavior data were collected continuously, and serial blood samples were collected following the MH challenge. Retrospectively, it was determined that 9 of the 18 MH-challenged steers mounted a minimal HPT response, despite having similar leukocyte and temperature responses to other MH-challenged steers with a greater HPT response. Our objective was to examine differences in behavioral and physiological responses between MH-challenged HPT responsive (RES; n = 9), MH-challenged HPT nonresponsive (NON; n = 9), and phosphate-buffered saline-inoculated controls (CON; n = 18). Additionally, ¹H NMR analysis was conducted to determine whether the HPT-responsive phenotype affected serum metabolite profiles. The RES steers had lesser (P < 0.05) cortisol concentrations than NON and CON steers. The magnitude of the increases in neutrophil concentrations and rumen temperature, and the reduction in DMI following the MH challenge were greatest (P < 0.05) in RES steers. Univariate analysis of serum metabolites indicated differences between RES, NON, and CON steers following the MH challenge; however, multivariate analysis revealed no difference between HPT-responsive phenotypes. Prior to the MH challenge, RES steers had longer (P < 0.05) head down and bunk visit durations, slower eating rates (P < 0.01) and greater (P < 0.05) daily variances in bunk visit frequency and head down duration compared with NON steers, suggesting that feeding behavior patterns were associated with the HPT-responsive phenotype. During the 28-d postchallenge period, RES steers had decreased (P < 0.05) final BW, tended (P = 0.06) to have lesser DMI, and had greater (P < 0.05) daily variances in head down and bunk visit durations compared with NON steers, which may have been attributed to their greater acute-phase protein response to the MH challenge. These results indicate that the HPT-responsive phenotype affected feeding behavior patterns and may be associated with disease resiliency in beef cattle.