Patrik Johansson

Prof. Patrik Johansson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 October 2014 in Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APA. Ponrouch
A. Ponrouch
DMD. Monti
D. Monti
ABA. Boschin
A. Boschin
BSB. Steen
B. Steen
PJPatrik Johansson
Patrik Johansson
MPM. R. Palacín
M. R. Palacín
The first review of the various electrolytes currently used and developed for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), both in terms of materials and concepts, is presented. In contrast to the Li-ion battery (LIB), which is a mature technology for which a more or less unanimously accepted “standard electrolyte” exists: 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC, the electrolyte of choice for SIBs has not yet fully conformed to a standard. This is true for both materials: salts, solvents, or additives, and concept, using the main track of organic solvents or aiming for other concepts. SIB research currently prospers, benefitting from using know-how gained from 30 years of LIB R&D. Here the currently employed electrolytes are emphasized and their effects on practical SIB performance are outlined, scrutinizing the rationale for specific choices made, salts, solvents, additives, concentrations, etc. for each specific cell set-up and usage conditions.

16 September 2021 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TLTeo Lombardo
Teo Lombardo
MDMarc Duquesnoy
Marc Duquesnoy
HEHassna El-Bouysidy
Hassna El-Bouysidy
FÅFabian Årén
Fabian Årén
AGAlfonso Gallo-Bueno
Alfonso Gallo-Bueno
AFAlejandro A. Franco
Alejandro A. Franco
This is a critical review of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) methods applied to battery research. It aims at providing a comprehensive, authoritative, and critical, yet easily understandable, review of general interest to the battery community. It addresses the concepts, approaches, tools, outcomes, and challenges of using AI/ML as an accelerator for the design and optimization of the next generation of batteries─a current hot topic. It intends to create both accessibility of these tools to the chemistry and electrochemical energy sciences communities and completeness in terms of the different battery R&D aspects covered.

29 October 2019 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
M. Elena Arroyo-de DompabloM. Elena Arroyo-de Dompablo
M. Elena Arroyo-de Dompablo
APAlexandre Ponrouch
Alexandre Ponrouch
PJPatrik Johansson
Patrik Johansson
MPM. Rosa Palacín
M. Rosa Palacín
This Review flows from past attempts to develop a (rechargeable) battery technology based on Ca via crucial breakthroughs to arrive at a comprehensive discussion of the current challenges at hand. The realization of a rechargeable Ca battery technology primarily requires identification and development of suitable electrodes and electrolytes, which is why we here cover the progress starting from the fundamental electrode/electrolyte requirements, concepts, materials, and compositions employed and finally a critical analysis of the state-of-the-art, allowing us to conclude with the particular roadblocks still existing. As for crucial breakthroughs, reversible plating and stripping of calcium at the metal-anode interface was achieved only recently and for very specific electrolyte formulations. Therefore, while much of the current research aims at finding suitable cathodes to achieve proof-of-concept for a full Ca battery, the spectrum of electrolytes researched is also expanded. Compatibility of cell components is essential, and to ensure this, proper characterization is needed, which requires design of a multitude of reliable experimental setups and sometimes methodology development beyond that of other next generation battery technologies. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for future strategies to make best use of the current advances in materials science combined with computational design, electrochemistry, and battery engineering, all to propel the Ca battery technology to reality and ultimately reach its full potential for energy storage.

12 March 2019 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AFAlejandro A. Franco
Alejandro A. Franco
ARAlexis Rucci
Alexis Rucci
DBDaniel Brandell
Daniel Brandell
CFChristine Frayret
Christine Frayret
MGMiran Gaberšček
Miran Gaberšček
PJPatrik Johansson
Patrik Johansson
This review addresses concepts, approaches, tools, and outcomes of multiscale modeling used to design and optimize the current and next generation rechargeable battery cells. Different kinds of multiscale models are discussed and demystified with a particular emphasis on methodological aspects. The outcome is compared both to results of other modeling strategies as well as to the vast pool of experimental data available. Finally, the main challenges remaining and future developments are discussed.

1 July 2021 in Journal of Physics: Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNuria Tapia
Nuria Tapia
Robert ArmstrongRobert Armstrong
Robert Armstrong
HAHande Alptekin
Hande Alptekin
MAMarco A Amores
Marco A Amores
HAHeather Au
Heather Au
RYReza Younesi
Reza Younesi
Increasing concerns regarding the sustainability of lithium sources, due to their limited availability and consequent expected price increase, have raised awareness of the importance of developing alternative energy-storage candidates that can sustain the ever-growing energy demand. Furthermore, limitations on the availability of the transition metals used in the manufacturing of cathode materials, together with questionable mining practices, are driving development towards more sustainable elements. Given the uniformly high abundance and cost-effectiveness of sodium, as well as its very suitable redox potential (close to that of lithium), sodium-ion battery technology offers tremendous potential to be a counterpart to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in different application scenarios, such as stationary energy storage and low-cost vehicles. This potential is reflected by the major investments that are being made by industry in a wide variety of markets and in diverse material combinations. Despite the associated advantages of being a drop-in replacement for LIBs, there are remarkable differences in the physicochemical properties between sodium and lithium that give rise to different behaviours, for example, different coordination preferences in compounds, desolvation energies, or solubility of the solid–electrolyte interphase inorganic salt components. This demands a more detailed study of the underlying physical and chemical processes occurring in sodium-ion batteries and allows great scope for groundbreaking advances in the field, from lab-scale to scale-up. This roadmap provides an extensive review by experts in academia and industry of the current state of the art in 2021 and the different research directions and strategies currently underway to improve the performance of sodium-ion batteries. The aim is to provide an opinion with respect to the current challenges and opportunities, from the fundamental properties to the practical applications of this technology.

6 July 2015 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKM. Kerner
M. Kerner
NPN. Plylahan
N. Plylahan
JSJ. Scheers
J. Scheers
PJPatrik Johansson
Patrik Johansson
Several IL based electrolytes with an imidazolium cation (EMI) have been investigated trying to elucidate a possible beneficial effect of mixing FSI and TFSI anions in terms of physico-chemical properties and especially Li+ solvation. All electrolytes were evaluated in terms of phase transitions, densities and viscosities, thermal stabilities, ionic conductivities and local structure, i.e. charge carriers. The electrolytes with up to 20% of Li-salts showed to be promising for high temperature lithium ion battery application (ca. 100 °C) and a synergetic effect of having mixed anions is discernible with the LiTFSI0.2EMIFSI0.8 electrolyte giving the best overall performance. The determination of the charge carriers revealed the SN to be ca. 2 for all analysed electrolytes, and proved the analysis of the mixed anion electrolytes to be challenging and inherently leads to an ambiguous picture of the Li+ solvation.