Plastic waste and pollution is growing rapidly worldwide and most plastics end up in landfill or are incinerated because high-quality recycling is not possible. Plastic-type identification with a low-cost, handheld spectral approach could help in parts of the world where high-end spectral imaging systems on conveyor belts cannot be implemented. Here, we investigate how two fundamentally different handheld infrared spectral devices can identify plastic types by benchmarking the same analysis against a high-resolution bench-top spectral approach. We used the handheld Plastic Scanner, which measures a discrete infrared spectrum using LED illumination at different wavelengths, and the SpectraPod, which has an integrated photonics chip which has varying responsivity in different channels in the near-infrared. We employ machine learning using SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest and Gaussian Naïve Bayes models on a full dataset of plastic samples of PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP and PS, with samples of varying shape, color and opacity, as measured with three different experimental approaches. The high-resolution spectral approach can obtain an accuracy (mean ± standard deviation) of (0.97 ± 0.01), whereas we obtain (0.93 ± 0.01) for the SpectraPod and (0.70 ± 0.03) for the Plastic Scanner. Differences of reflectance at subsequent wavelengths prove to be the most important features in the plastic-type classification model when using high-resolution spectroscopy, which is not possible with the other two devices. Lower accuracy for the handheld devices is caused by their limitations, as the spectral range of both devices is limited—up to 1600 nm for the SpectraPod, while the Plastic Scanner has limited sensitivity to reflectance at wavelengths of 1100 and 1350 nm, where certain plastic types show characteristic absorbance bands. We suggest that combining selective sensitivity channels (as in the SpectraPod) and illuminating the sample with varying LEDs (as with the Plastic Scanner) could increase the accuracy in plastic-type identification with a handheld device.

Spectral imaging has many applications, from methane detection using satellites to disease detection on crops. However, spectral cameras remain a costly solution ranging from 10 thousand to 100 thousand euros for the hardware alone. Here, we present a low-cost multispectral camera (LC-MSC) with 64 LEDs in eight different colors and a monochrome camera with a hardware cost of 340 euros. Our prototype reproduces spectra accurately when compared to a reference spectrometer to within the spectral width of the LEDs used and the ±1$\sigma$ variation over the surface of ceramic reference tiles. The mean absolute difference in reflectance is an overestimate of 0.03 for the LC-MSC as compared to a spectrometer, due to the spectral shape of the tiles. In environmental light levels of 0.5 W m⁻² (bright artificial indoor lighting) our approach shows an increase in noise, but still faithfully reproduces discrete reflectance spectra over 400 nm–1000 nm. Our approach is limited in its application by LED bandwidth and availability of specific LED wavelengths. However, unlike with conventional spectral cameras, the pixel pitch of the camera itself is not limited, providing higher image resolution than typical high-end multi- and hyperspectral cameras. For sample conditions where LED illumination bands provide suitable spectral information, our LC-MSC is an interesting low-cost alternative approach to spectral imaging.

High-resolution and super-resolution techniques become more frequently used in thick, inhomogeneous samples. In particular for imaging life cells and tissue in which one wishes to observe a biological process at minimal interference and in the natural environment, sample inhomogeneities are unavoidable. Yet sample-inhomogeneities are paralleled by refractive index variations, for example between the cell organelles and the surrounding medium, that will result in the refraction of light, and therefore lead to sample-induced astigmatism. Astigmatism in turn will result in positional inaccuracies of observations that are at the heart of all super-resolution techniques. Here we introduce a simple model and define a figure-of-merit that allows one to quickly assess the importance of astigmatism for a given experimental setting. We found that astigmatism caused by the cell’s nucleus can easily lead to aberrations up to hundreds of nanometers, well beyond the accuracy of all super-resolution techniques. The astigmatism generated by small objects, like bacteria or vesicles, appear to be small enough to be of any significance in typical super-resolution experimentation.