After coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic, vaccines were rapidly developed to control the spread of the virus. Although they were effective in most of the cases at protecting people from becoming seriously ill and being hospitalized, they showed side effects, too. Among other adverse vaccine reactions, cutaneous eruptions following SARS-CoV-2 have been described in the literature, but they are not well-characterized yet. We described the morphology and timing of the spectrum of cutaneous reactions following most of the COVID-19 vaccines available in Italy, which were observed in outpatients referred to our non-invasive diagnostic clinic. Most of these reactions appeared after the second or third COVID-19 vaccine dose (most of them after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines). Our data support that cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccination are generally self-limited; in addition, history of allergic reaction to a specific food, medicine or vaccine should not discourage vaccination in the general population, although patients with immune dysregulation should be accurately selected and monitored. Further research is necessary to better assess the true prevalence and preventive measures of skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccination.

Alopecia areata (AA) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are complex immune-mediated conditions that frequently coexist in pediatric patients, complicating treatment approaches. Upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, modulates both Th1 and Th2 pathways and is approved for AD in adolescents and adults. This study presents a case series of three adolescent patients with refractory AA and AD treated with upadacitinib 15 mg/day for 12 months, alongside a comprehensive literature review. All patients demonstrated rapid remission of AD symptoms within the first month and progressive hair regrowth, with SALT scores significantly improving at six and twelve months. No severe adverse events were reported. Notably, one patient achieved complete regrowth despite the presence of ophiasis, a pattern typically associated with poor prognosis. Our literature review identified only four previous pediatric cases successfully treated with upadacitinib, highlighting the novelty of our findings. These cases, together with our experience, suggest that upadacitinib offers a safe and effective therapeutic option for pediatric patients with concomitant AA and AD, including those who failed conventional or biologic therapies such as dupilumab. Larger, controlled studies are needed to confirm long-term efficacy and safety. Our results also support the potential role of upadacitinib in managing multiple Th1/Th2-mediated comorbidities in pediatric populations.

IgE-mediated food allergy is characterized immunologically by a type 1 immune response triggered upon exposure to specific foods and clinically by a broad range of manifestations and variable severity. Our understanding of food allergy within the allergic march of atopic dermatitis (AD) is still incomplete despite the related risk of unpredictable and potentially severe associated reactions such as anaphylactic shock. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of dupilumab, an IL-4/IL-13 monoclonal antibody approved for AD, on the allergic sensitization profile of patients with AD and type 1 hypersensitivity-related comorbidities, including oral allergy syndrome, anaphylaxis, and gastrointestinal disorders. We conducted an observational pilot study with a longitudinal prospective design, enrolling 20 patients eligible for treatment with dupilumab. Laboratory exams for total serum IgE, specific IgE, and molecular allergen components were performed at baseline and after 16 weeks of therapy. Our results demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in molecular components, specific IgE for trophoallergens, and specific IgE for aeroallergens following treatment with dupilumab. We suggest that modulating type 2 immunity may decrease IgE-mediated responses assessed with laboratory exams and therefore could minimize allergic symptoms in polysensitized patients. Upcoming results of randomized controlled trials investigating dupilumab in food allergy are highly anticipated to confirm its potential effect in the treatment of IgE-mediated food allergies.

Background/Objectives: Sulfated hyaluronic acid (sHA) is a chemically modified derivative of native hyaluronic acid (HA), characterized by enhanced physicochemical stability and increased biological activity. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), including HA, are key regulators of skin structure, hydration, and immune homeostasis. This review aims to critically summarize current knowledge on the structural and functional properties of GAGs—particularly HA and its sulfated forms—and to explore their potential dermatological applications in skin aging and inflammatory diseases such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and acne. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases up to June 2025, including experimental, preclinical, and clinical studies investigating the biological effects, mechanisms of action, and dermatological uses of sHA compared with native HA and other HA derivatives. Results: Compared with HA, sHA demonstrates increased enzymatic resistance, higher charge density, and improved water-binding and antioxidant capacity. These properties contribute to the restoration of skin barrier function, modulation of oxidative stress and inflammation, and promotion of extracellular matrix remodeling. Preclinical evidence supports the efficacy of sHA in reducing dryness, irritation, and inflammatory responses in atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and acne. Preliminary findings also suggest potential benefits in wound healing and skin barrier repair. Conclusions: sHA represents a promising multifunctional molecule in dermatology and cosmetology, capable of reducing inflammation and supporting tissue regeneration. However, current evidence remains limited to preliminary studies. Future controlled clinical trials are required to confirm efficacy, optimize formulations, and establish standardized treatment protocols.

Food allergy is an increasingly prevalent global health condition characterized by immune-mediated reactions to dietary antigens and a substantial clinical burden. Growing understanding of IgE-mediated mechanisms has highlighted the central role of type 2 inflammation, effector-cell activation, and impaired immune regulation. These advances have prompted the development of disease-modifying therapies beyond allergen avoidance. This narrative review summarizes recent advances in the therapeutic management of IgE-mediated food allergy. A structured PubMed search was performed to identify clinical trials, randomized studies, and meta-analyses published within the last five years. Both allergen-specific and non-allergen-specific interventions were evaluated. Current evidence supports oral immunotherapy as the most effective strategy for increasing reaction thresholds and inducing desensitization in peanut, milk, and egg allergies. However, safety concerns remain, and sustained unresponsiveness after treatment discontinuation is achieved inconsistently. Sublingual and epicutaneous immunotherapy show improved safety but lower efficacy. Modified allergen approaches, including baked milk and processed peanut products, may improve tolerability and facilitate immune modulation in selected patients. Biologic therapies, particularly anti-IgE agents, demonstrate efficacy both alone and when combined with immunotherapy. Emerging approaches include peptide vaccines, DNA immunization, microbiome-targeted interventions, and early dietary modulation. These strategies may improve durable immune tolerance through personalized, mechanism-based therapeutic approaches. Future progress will depend on optimizing safety, identifying predictive biomarkers, and integrating multimodal approaches to achieve durable immune tolerance.

Background: Eczematous dermatitis refers to a group of inflammatory skin disorders—including seborrheic, atopic, and contact dermatitis—characterized by epidermal barrier dysfunction and chronic inflammation. Disrupting the itch–scratch cycle and reversing microscopic skin changes are key to improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Aims: This study aimed to assess the clinical and microscopic effects of a topical medical device containing N-butanoyl glutathione (GSH-C4) and hyaluronic acid in patients with inflammatory eczematous dermatitis, combining clinical scores with in vivo confocal and OCT imaging. Methods: A prospective clinical trial enrolled 30 patients with active eczematous lesions. Participants applied a GSH-C4/hyaluronic acid-based product (GSEBA^®) for 28 days. Clinical improvement was evaluated at baseline, day 14, and day 28 using the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA), a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for itching, and a self-reported index of disease impact on quality of life (IDL). Microscopic changes were assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Results: After 28 days, the mean IGA score improved from 2.48 to 0.18 (p < 0.001), VAS itching score decreased from 4.52 to 0.32 (p < 0.001), and IDL dropped from 4.86 to 0.79 (p < 0.001). RCM analysis showed significant reductions in key inflammatory features such as spongiosis, vesiculation, and inflammatory infiltrate. OCT revealed a significant decrease in vascularization at 150 μm depth, with no change in collagen density. Conclusions: The GSH-C4/hyaluronic acid-based mousse (GSEBA^®) demonstrated strong clinical efficacy and excellent tolerability in managing eczematous dermatitis. It effectively reduced both symptoms and microscopic markers of inflammation without compromising dermal structure.