Digital elevation models (DEMs) are the basic data of science and engineering technology research. SRTM and ASTER GDEM are currently widely used global DEMs, and TanDEM-X DEM, released in 2016, has attracted users’ attention due to its unprecedented accuracy. These global datasets are often used for local applications and the quality of DEMs affects the results of applications. Many researchers have assessed and compared the quality of global DEMs on a local scale. To provide some additional insights on quality assessment of 12- and 30-m resolution TanDEM-X DEMs, 30-m resolution ASTER GDEM and 30-m resolution SRTM, this study assessed differences’ performance in relation to not only geographical features but also the ways in which DEMs have been created on selected Chinese sites, taking ICESat/GLAS points with 14-cm absolute vertical accuracy but size of 70-m diameter and 12-m resolution TanDEM-X DEM with less than 10-m absolute vertical accuracy as the reference data for comprehensive quality evaluation. When comparing the three 30-m DEMs with the reference DEM, an improved Least Z-Difference (LZD) method was applied for co-registration between models, and Quantile–Quantile (Q-Q) plot was used to identify if the DEM errors follow a normal distribution to help choose proper statistical indicators accordingly. The results show that: (1) TanDEM-X DEMs have the best overall quality, followed by SRTM. ASTER GDEM has the worst quality. The 12-m TanDEM-X DEM has significant advantages in describing terrain details. (2) The quality of DEM has a strong relationship with slope, aspect and land cover. However, the relationship between aspect and vertical quality weakens after data co-registration. The quality of DEMs gets higher with the increasing number of images used in the fusion process. The quality in where slopes opposite to the radar beam is the worst for SRTM, which could provide a new perspective for quality assessment of SRTM and other DEMs whose incidence angle files are available. (3) Systematic deviations can reduce the vertical quality of DEM. The differences have non-normal distribution even after co-registration. For researchers who want to know the quality of a DEM in order to use it in further applications, they should pay more attention to the terrain factors and land cover in their study areas and the ways in which the DEM has been created.

Repeat-pass spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is commonly used to measure surface deformation; phase delays due to atmospheric water vapour may have significant impact on the accuracy of these measurements. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using forecasts and analyses from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models – which can provide good estimates of the atmospheric state – to correct for atmospheric phase delays. In this study, three separate estimates of atmospheric water vapour content from NWP output are used in combination with Environmental Satellite (Envisat) Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) data over the Pearl River Delta region in South China to mitigate atmospheric distortion. The NWP-based estimates are derived from: (1) interpolation of National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Final Operational Global Analysis (FNL) data; (2) Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations initialized with FNL analysis without additional data assimilation; and (3) WRF simulations initialized with a three-dimensional variational (3DVar) data assimilation system that ingests additional meteorological observations. The accuracy of the atmospheric corrections from these different NWP model outputs is further verified quantitatively with precipitable water vapour (PWV) data from several ground-based global positioning system (GPS) stations in Hong Kong. Inter-comparison shows a good agreement between the PWV derived from the WRF-3DVar simulations and the GPS measurements, suggesting that atmospheric correction by convection-permitting WRF simulations initialized with mesoscale data assimilation may effectively mitigate atmospheric distortion in InSAR measurements, especially for coastal areas.

Distributed scatterers interferometric synthetic aperture radar (DS-InSAR) has been widely used in measuring non-urban area displacement. However, the process of identifying homogeneous pixels (HPs) through hypothesis testing is often time-consuming, and the results may not provide sufficiently consistent signals for phase reconstruction. This letter proposed a method to identify geomorphic statistical homogeneous pixels (GSHPs) by introducing land cover types and terrain features as constraint condition. Water, shadow and layover area are masked off. And the land cover types, slope and aspect are used for HPs test. GSHPs is tested in the Three Gorges Dam Reservoir Area and the Three Parallel Rivers of Yunnan in China using Sentinel-1 data (2020-2022). The results show that GSHPs method saves 23% identification time and improves the consistency of HPs signal compared to classical SHPs. Several reported landslides’ activities are successfully detected by GSHPs.

The delay caused by the troposphere is one of the major sources of errors limiting the accuracy of InSAR measurements. The tropospheric correction of InSAR measurements is important. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model is a state-of-the-art mesoscale numerical weather prediction system designed for atmospheric research applications. It can be applied to InSAR tropospheric correction. Its parameters can be altered according to the requirements of the given application. WRF is usually initialized based on 3 h- or 6 h temporal resolution data in InSAR tropospheric correction studies, a lower temporal resolution compared to ERA5 data. A lower time resolution means a longer integration time for WRF to simulate from the initial time to the target time. Initialization with a higher resolution can shorten the integration time of the simulation theoretically and improve its accuracy. However, an evaluation of the effectiveness of ERA5_WRF for InSAR tropospheric correction is lacking. To evaluate the efficiency of WRF tropospheric correction, we used Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for initialization to drive the WRF (ERA5_WRF) for efficient applications in InSAR. Three methods based on global atmospheric models—FNL_WRF (tropospheric correction method based on WRF driven by NCEP FNL), Generic Atmospheric Correction Online Service for InSAR (GACOS), and ERA5—were used to evaluate the corrective effects of ERA5_WRF. The reliability of ERA5_WRF in different scenarios with large tropospheric delay was evaluated from the spatial and temporal perspectives by considering seasonal, topographic, and climatic factors. Its applications in the local space showed that ERA5_WRF could adequately correct tropospheric delay. Benefits include its high-quality data sources and the simulation of WRF, and its application in different seasons had proven superior to other methods in terms of the corrective effects of elevation-related and spatially related delays in summer. By analyzing the data sources and downscaling methods of correction methods and weather conditions of cases, ERA5_WRF had superior performance under the condition of large content and hourly variation of tropospheric delay. Furthermore, WRF showed the potential for tropospheric correction when other higher-quality data appear in the future.

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is an effective tool in detecting building damage. At present, more and more studies detect building damage using a single post-event fully polarimetric SAR (PolSAR) image, because it permits faster and more convenient damage detection work. However, the existence of non-buildings and obliquely-oriented buildings in disaster areas presents a challenge for obtaining accurate detection results using only post-event PolSAR data. To solve these problems, a new method is proposed in this work to detect completely collapsed buildings using a single post-event full polarization SAR image. The proposed method makes two improvements to building damage detection. First, it provides a more effective solution for non-building area removal in post-event PolSAR images. By selecting and combining three competitive polarization features, the proposed solution can remove most non-building areas effectively, including mountain vegetation and farmland areas, which are easily confused with collapsed buildings. Second, it significantly improves the classification performance of collapsed and standing buildings. A new polarization feature was created specifically for the classification of obliquely-oriented and collapsed buildings via development of the optimization of polarimetric contrast enhancement (OPCE) matching algorithm. Using this developed feature combined with texture features, the proposed method effectively distinguished collapsed and obliquely-oriented buildings, while simultaneously also identifying the affected collapsed buildings in error-prone areas. Experiments were implemented on three PolSAR datasets obtained in fully polarimetric mode: Radarsat-2 PolSAR data from the 2010 Yushu earthquake in China (resolution: 12 m, scale of the study area: $50{\mathrm{km}}^2$); ALOS PALSAR PolSAR data from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami in Japan (resolution: 23.14 m, scale of the study area: $113{\mathrm{km}}^2$); and ALOS-2 PolSAR data from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan (resolution: 5.1 m, scale of the study area: $5{\mathrm{km}}^2$). Through the experiments, the proposed method was proven to obtain more than 90% accuracy for built-up area extraction in post-event PolSAR data. The achieved detection accuracies of building damage were 82.3%, 97.4%, and 78.5% in Yushu, Ishinomaki, and Mashiki town study sites, respectively.