Introduction: Approximately 20–33% of all cancer patients are treated with acid-reducing agents (ARAs), most commonly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), to reduce gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Palbociclib and ribociclib are weak bases so their solubility depends on different pH. The solubility of palbociclib dramatically decreases to < 0.5 mg/ml when pH is above 4,5 but ribociclibs’ solubility decreases when pH increases above 6,5. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effects of concurrent PPIs on palbociclib and ribociclib efficacy in terms of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients. Patients and methods: We enrolled hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC patients treated with endocrine treatment (letrozole or fulvestrant) combined palbociclib or ribociclib alone or with PPI accompanying our observational study. During palbociclib/ribociclib therapy, patients should be treated with "concurrent PPIs" defined as all or more than half of treatment with palbociclib/ribociclib, If no PPI was applied, it was defined as ‘no concurrent PPI’, those who used PPI but less than half were excluded from the study. All data was collected from real-life retrospectively. Results: Our study included 217 patients, 105 of whom received palbociclib and 112 received ribociclib treatment. In the study population CDK inhibitor treatment was added to fulvestrant 102 patients ( 47%), to letrozole 115 patients (53%). In the Palbociclib arm fulvestrant/letrozole ratio was 53.3/46.7%, in the ribociclib arm it was 41.07/58.93%. Of 105 patients who received palbociclib, 65 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 40 were not. Of the 112 patients who received ribociclib, 61 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 51 were not. In the palbociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (13.04 months vs. unreachable, p < 0.001). It was determined that taking PPIs was an independent predictor of shortening PFS (p < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis, In the ribociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (12.64 months vs. unreachable, p = 0.003). It was determined that taking PPIs was single statistically independent predictor of shortening PFS (p = 0.003, univariate analysis). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that concomitant usage of PPIs was associated with shorter PFS in mBC treated with both ribociclib and especially palbociclib. If it needs to be used, PPI selection should be made carefully and low-strength PPI or other ARAs (eg H2 antagonists, antacids) should be preferred.

Adrenal PEComa Treated by Surgical Resection and Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Case Report - Article abstract #945177

Patients with metastatic malignant melanoma have a survival rate of less than one year. Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor, has improved survival in patients without BRAF mutations. The HALP score, calculated from hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet levels, provides information about a patient immune and nutritional status. High HALP scores have been associated with a better prognosis in various cancers. This study aimed to investigate the effect of high HALP scores on response to nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. A retrospective study was conducted on 44 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with nivolumab at Adana City Training and Research Hospital between 2014 and 2021. Patients who received dabrafenib-trametinib before nivolumab treatment were excluded. The HALP scores were calculated using laboratory parameters before the first nivolumab treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0. The study included 22 female and 22 male patients with a mean age of 61.4 ± 15.6 years. Of the patients, 10 (27.2%) had a positive BRAF mutation, whereas 34 (77.3%) did not. The HALP score cutoff value was determined as 30.1. Patients with high HALP scores had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with low HALP scores (PFS: median 5.8 vs 3.1 months, P = .041; OS: median 54.9 vs 14.4 months, P = .005). In this study, we found that high HALP scores were significantly associated with longer PFS and OS in metastatic malignant melanoma patients receiving nivolumab treatment. HALP score was associated with both PFS and OS in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with nivolumab. This immuno-nutritional parameter may be useful in various cancers; however, further prospective studies with larger patient cohorts are needed for clinical application.

Glioblastoma multiforme en sık görülen ve en agresif primer beyin tümörüdür. Glioblastoma multiforme'nin prognozu oldukça kötüdür. Bu tümörlerin küratif tedavilerinden sonra bile, intrakraniyal lokal nüks, kraniyal metastaz ve spinal metastazlar ortaya çıkabilir. Kraniyal glioblastoma multiforme olgularının %0.4–%2’sinde spinal metastaz teşhis edilebilir. Bu hastalarda tanıdan spinal metastaza kadar geçen süre 10-13 aydır ve spinal metastaz sonrası ortalama sağkalım süresi 3-4 aydır. Sol frontal lobda glioblastoma multiformeden operasyon öyküsü olan hastamızda sıradışı olarak tanıdan 4 yıl sonra spinal metastaz gelişmiş, hasta palyatif radyoterapiye rağmen tanıdan 53 gün sonra ölmüştür. Bu olguda uzun süre progresyonsuz seyreden supratentoryal yerleşimli primer glioblastoma multiformeden kaynaklanan nadir spinal metastazı vurgulayacağız.

Background: Breast cancer outcomes are influenced by tumor biology, stage at diagnosis, and access to timely care. Refugee populations may experience disparities in cancer outcomes despite formal access to healthcare services. Türkiye hosts the largest population of Syrian refugees globally and provides universal access to oncology care, offering a unique context to examine equity in breast cancer outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of female patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2013 and 2022 at two tertiary oncology centers in Gaziantep, Türkiye. Patients were grouped as Syrian refugees or Turkish citizens based on recorded nationality. Baseline clinicopathologic features and stage at diagnosis were compared between groups. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Survival analyses were performed overall and stratified by stage category (I–III vs. IV). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between ethnicity and OS with adjustment for stage and molecular subtype (and other prespecified covariates as appropriate). Treatment delivery patterns (systemic therapy and radiotherapy) were descriptively compared to evaluate access after entry into care. Results: Among 499 patients (150 Syrian refugees; 349 Turkish citizens), Syrian patients were younger at diagnosis and more frequently presented with de novo metastatic disease. In the overall cohort with survival data (n = 430), unadjusted OS differed by ethnicity; however, survival differences were attenuated after stratification by stage. In stage I–III disease, OS did not significantly differ between groups, and in stage IV disease, median OS was comparable between ethnicities. In multivariable analysis adjusting for stage and molecular subtype, ethnicity was not independently associated with OS, whereas stage and molecular subtype remained prognostic. Treatment delivery patterns in both the non-metastatic and metastatic settings were broadly similar between groups. Conclusions: Within a universal healthcare system, the dominant disparity between Syrian refugees and Turkish citizens was more advanced stage at presentation. After accounting for stage and tumor biology, ethnicity itself was not independently associated with overall survival, suggesting that efforts to reduce outcome gaps should prioritize earlier diagnosis and linkage to care.