Daniel Uzbelger Feldman

Dr. Daniel Uzbelger Feldman

Endodontology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 January 2013 in Clinical Anatomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLK. Lin
K. Lin
Daniel Uzbelger FeldmanDaniel Uzbelger Feldman
Daniel Uzbelger Feldman
Mary F. BarbeMary F. Barbe
Mary F. Barbe

10 April 2015 in Clinical Anatomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDaniel P. Bitner
Daniel P. Bitner
Daniel Uzbelger FeldmanDaniel Uzbelger Feldman
Daniel Uzbelger Feldman
KAKevin Axx
Kevin Axx
JAJasim M. Albandar
Jasim M. Albandar

1 July 2016 in Journal of Anesthesia History
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKS. Kim
S. Kim
Daniel Uzbelger FeldmanDaniel Uzbelger Feldman
Daniel Uzbelger Feldman
JYJ. Yang
J. Yang

10 December 2014 in Radiology Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMArnav R. Mistry
Arnav R. Mistry
Daniel Uzbelger FeldmanDaniel Uzbelger Feldman
Daniel Uzbelger Feldman
JYJie Yang
Jie Yang
EREric Ryterski
Eric Ryterski
Objective(s). The major challenge encountered to decrease the milliamperes (mA) level in X-ray imaging systems is the quantum noise phenomena. This investigation evaluated dose exposure and image resolution of a low dose X-ray imaging (LDXI) prototype comprising a low mA X-ray source and a novel microlens-based sensor relative to current imaging technologies.Study Design. A LDXI in static (group 1) and dynamic (group 2) modes was compared to medical fluoroscopy (group 3), digital intraoral radiography (group 4), and CBCT scan (group 5) using a dental phantom.Results. The Mann-Whitney test showed no statistical significance(α=0.01)in dose exposure between groups 1 and 3 and 1 and 4 and timing exposure (seconds) between groups 1 and 5 and 2 and 3. Image resolution test showed group 1 > group 4 > group 2 > group 3 > group 5.Conclusions. The LDXI proved the concept for obtaining a high definition image resolution for static and dynamic radiography at lower or similar dose exposure and smaller pixel size, respectively, when compared to current imaging technologies. Lower mA at the X-ray source and high QE at the detector level principles with microlens could be applied to current imaging technologies to considerably reduce dose exposure without compromising image resolution in the near future.

12 August 2024 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Daniel Uzbelger FeldmanDaniel Uzbelger Feldman
Daniel Uzbelger Feldman
BLBilly B Laun
Billy B Laun
CPChirag Patel
Chirag Patel
SPSonal V. Pande
Sonal V. Pande
SBSai HS. Boddu
Sai HS. Boddu
Lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine (LW/E) is widely used to prevent pain during dental procedures and has been associated with injection sting, jittering effects, slow onset, and a bitter aftertaste. Since LW/E’s introduction in 1948, no significant modifications have been proposed. This study aims to design and characterize an improved dental lidocaine HCl injectable formulation without epinephrine (LW/O/E) via buffers, sweeteners, and amino acids. LW/O/E injections were prepared with pH and osmolality values of 6.5–7.0 and 590–610 mOsm/kg. Using the electronic tongue (ETongue), the LW/O/E injectable formulations were characterized for viscosity, injectability, and taste analysis. The results were compared with the LW/E control. In vivo efficacy and anesthetic duration of the samples were measured through radiant heat tail-flick latency (RHTFL) and hot plate (HP) tests and local toxicity was assessed after a single intra-oral injection in Sprague Dawley rats (SDR). The viscosity and injectability values of the LW/O/E samples were found to be comparable to the LW/E injection. ETongue taste analysis showed an improvement in bitterness reduction of the LW/O/E samples compared to the LW/E formulation. Toxicity studies of samples in SDR showed minor and transient signs of erythema/eschar and edema. Anesthetic duration via RHTFL and HP paw withdrawal latency time in SDR were found to be comparable for the LW/O/E Sample 3A and the LW/E injection (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the buffered, higher osmolality and reduced bitterness developed LW/O/E formulation (Sample 3A) could be considered a promising alternative to the LW/E formulation for dental use.

1 April 2008 in Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Daniel Uzbelger FeldmanDaniel Uzbelger Feldman
Daniel Uzbelger Feldman
JYJ. Yang
J. Yang
CSC. Susin
C. Susin