Background and Objectives: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a life-threatening disease that requires early diagnosis and treatment. It is known that a positive culture result for SBP, which is a common reason for admission to the emergency department, is related to the severity and prognosis of the disease. However, as it is not possible to determine the culture result in the early stage of the disease, different methods are required to predict prognosis in the emergency department. This study was conducted to evaluate the success of the SII, SIRI, NLR and PLR in predicting culture results, intensive care needs and mortality in patients with SBP admitted to the emergency department. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational study. Patients with SBP who applied to the emergency department were included in this study. Pregnant women, patients with a malignancy, patients with another infection and patients with liver failure were excluded from this study. Data were analyzed in terms of culture results, the need for intensive care and mortality development. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 26. Results are presented with a 95% confidence interval. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Participant data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test based on normality, and ROC analyses were conducted to assess test accuracies and determine cut-off values. Results: A total of 275 patients were included in this study. Although the culture results of 183 patients were positive, 92 were negative. The SII, NLR and PLR were found to be significantly higher in culture-positive patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.013 and p = 0.002, respectively). The SII and NLR were found to be significantly higher in patients with high mortality (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Conclusions: This study showed that the SII, NLR and PLR may be useful in predicting culture positivity and prognosis in SBP patients in the emergency department.

Objectives: Febrile neutropenia is a common oncologic emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Although the MASCC (Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer) score is widely used for risk stratification, its limited sensitivity and lack of laboratory parameters reduce its prognostic utility. This study aimed to evaluate whether incorporating serum lactate and CRP measurements into the MASCC score enhances its predictive performance for hospital admission and the 30-day mortality. Methods: This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study included adult patients diagnosed with febrile neutropenia in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital between January 2021 and December 2024. The original MASCC score was calculated, and three modified models were derived: the MASCC-L (lactate/MASCC), MASCC-C (CRP/MASCC) and MASCC-LC models (CRP × lactate/MASCC). The predictive accuracy for hospital admission and the 30-day all-cause mortality was assessed using ROC analysis. Results: A total of 269 patients (mean age: 67.6 ± 12.4 years) were included; the 30-day mortality was 3.0%. The MASCC-LC model demonstrated the highest discriminative ability for mortality prediction (area under the curve (AUC): 0.995; sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 98%). For hospital admission prediction, the MASCC-C model had the highest specificity (81%), while the MASCC-LC model showed the best balance of sensitivity and specificity (both 73%). All the modified models outperformed the original MASCC score regarding both endpoints. Conclusions: Integrating lactate and CRP measurements into the MASCC score significantly improves its prognostic accuracy for both mortality and hospital admission in febrile neutropenic patients. The MASCC-LC model, relying on only three objective parameters, may serve as a practical and efficient tool for early risk stratification in emergency settings.

Background and Objectives: Acute cardiorespiratory failure disrupts the delicate balance of energy supply, demand, and consumption, with elevated lactate levels and decreased blood pH serving as crucial indicators. Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPO), a common cause of acute respiratory failure, poses a substantial mortality risk. Lactate, a byproduct of pyruvate reduction, is a pertinent marker in perfusion assessment. Lactate clearance (LC) has proven prognostic efficacy in various conditions but lacks consensus on its predictive power in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study, conducted in a metropolitan area’s third-level emergency department, involved patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema from May 2021 to August 2023. The inclusion criteria specified acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, excluding patients with incomplete data or other respiratory conditions. Lactate clearance, calculated at presentation and after 6 h, served as the primary outcome predictor. Our data analysis employed logistic regression, the ROC curve, and statistical tests. Results: The cohort of 106 patients revealed that a lactate clearance below 14.29% was significantly associated with mortality. While 51.6% of survivors were discharged, LC’s predictive success for discharge was inconclusive. Logistic regression underscored the significance of lactate clearance, with a one-unit increase yielding a 5.55-fold probability of survival. The AUC for LC was 0.759. Conclusions: This study pioneers the exploration of lactate clearance in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. LC below 14.29% signifies a poor prognosis, emphasizing its potential as an early treatment initiation marker. While acknowledging this study’s limitations, we advocate for further multicenter research to refine the understanding of lactate clearance in this context.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the pre- and post-treatment changes in ICEB and ICEBc score markers of cardiac electrical balance in patients presenting to the emergency department with hypertensive urgency and to investigate their relationship with short-term clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 50 patients who presented to a tertiary university hospital emergency department between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2024 with a diagnosis of hypertensive urgency and had pre- and post-treatment 12-lead ECGs were analysed. ICEB (QT/QRS) and ICEBc (QTc/QRS) scores were calculated manually. Patients were categorized as discharged or hospitalized. Within-group and between-group comparisons of the scores were performed. Results: Of the patients, 66% were female, and the mean age was 60.4 ± 14.5 years. A statistically significant increase in ICEB scores was observed after treatment in discharged patients (p = 0.006), whereas ICEBc scores showed no significant change. In the hospitalized group, no significant difference was found in either ICEB or ICEBc scores. Additionally, between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in ICEBc values. Conclusions: The ICEB score may serve as a dynamic marker reflecting the electrophysiological response to antihypertensive treatment. The observed increase in ICEB after treatment may indicate the restoration of electrical stability. In contrast, ICEBc appeared to have limited predictive value in this clinical context. Further prospective studies with larger populations are needed to determine the clinical utility of ICEB in the management of hypertensive crises.