Background and Objectives: Acute pancreatitis, characterized by pancreatic inflammation, poses significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, with varied etiologies including gallstones, alcohol, and certain medications. Necrotizing pancreatitis represents a severe form of parenchymal damage with considerable impact on patient quality of life. Early identification of necrotizing pancreatitis is crucial for timely intervention and improved outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the usability of CONUT and PNI scores as prognostic indicators. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study involving patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pancreatitis between January 2020 and October 2023. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI) were calculated from serum biomarkers to assess nutritional status. Patients were categorized into necrotizing and nonnecrotizing pancreatitis groups, and the utility of CONUT and PNI scores in predicting necrotizing pancreatitis was evaluated. Results: A total of 339 patients were included, with 8.26% diagnosed with necrotizing pancreatitis. CONUT and PNI scores significantly differed between necrotizing and nonnecrotizing groups, with higher CONUT scores and lower PNI scores observed in the necrotizing group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed significant predictive value of CONUT and PNI scores for necrotizing pancreatitis, with cutoff values of >5 and ≤34, respectively. Conclusions: CONUT and PNI scores demonstrate promise in predicting necrotizing pancreatitis in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute pancreatitis. Additionally, these scores may serve as prognostic indicators for mortality in acute pancreatitis patients. Early identification using CONUT and PNI scores could facilitate timely intervention, potentially reducing mortality and morbidity in this patient population.

Background and Objectives: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a life-threatening disease that requires early diagnosis and treatment. It is known that a positive culture result for SBP, which is a common reason for admission to the emergency department, is related to the severity and prognosis of the disease. However, as it is not possible to determine the culture result in the early stage of the disease, different methods are required to predict prognosis in the emergency department. This study was conducted to evaluate the success of the SII, SIRI, NLR and PLR in predicting culture results, intensive care needs and mortality in patients with SBP admitted to the emergency department. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational study. Patients with SBP who applied to the emergency department were included in this study. Pregnant women, patients with a malignancy, patients with another infection and patients with liver failure were excluded from this study. Data were analyzed in terms of culture results, the need for intensive care and mortality development. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 26. Results are presented with a 95% confidence interval. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Participant data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test based on normality, and ROC analyses were conducted to assess test accuracies and determine cut-off values. Results: A total of 275 patients were included in this study. Although the culture results of 183 patients were positive, 92 were negative. The SII, NLR and PLR were found to be significantly higher in culture-positive patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.013 and p = 0.002, respectively). The SII and NLR were found to be significantly higher in patients with high mortality (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Conclusions: This study showed that the SII, NLR and PLR may be useful in predicting culture positivity and prognosis in SBP patients in the emergency department.

Objectives: Febrile neutropenia is a common oncologic emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Although the MASCC (Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer) score is widely used for risk stratification, its limited sensitivity and lack of laboratory parameters reduce its prognostic utility. This study aimed to evaluate whether incorporating serum lactate and CRP measurements into the MASCC score enhances its predictive performance for hospital admission and the 30-day mortality. Methods: This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study included adult patients diagnosed with febrile neutropenia in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital between January 2021 and December 2024. The original MASCC score was calculated, and three modified models were derived: the MASCC-L (lactate/MASCC), MASCC-C (CRP/MASCC) and MASCC-LC models (CRP × lactate/MASCC). The predictive accuracy for hospital admission and the 30-day all-cause mortality was assessed using ROC analysis. Results: A total of 269 patients (mean age: 67.6 ± 12.4 years) were included; the 30-day mortality was 3.0%. The MASCC-LC model demonstrated the highest discriminative ability for mortality prediction (area under the curve (AUC): 0.995; sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 98%). For hospital admission prediction, the MASCC-C model had the highest specificity (81%), while the MASCC-LC model showed the best balance of sensitivity and specificity (both 73%). All the modified models outperformed the original MASCC score regarding both endpoints. Conclusions: Integrating lactate and CRP measurements into the MASCC score significantly improves its prognostic accuracy for both mortality and hospital admission in febrile neutropenic patients. The MASCC-LC model, relying on only three objective parameters, may serve as a practical and efficient tool for early risk stratification in emergency settings.

The rate of patients undergoing tomography in the emergency department has increased in the last two decades. In the last few years, there has been a more significant increase due to the effects of the pandemic. This study aimed to determine the rate of patients who underwent chest imaging in the emergency department, the preferred imaging method, and the demographic characteristics of the patients undergoing imaging during the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods. This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients admitted to the emergency department between January 2019 and March 2023. The number of female, male, and total emergency admissions, the rate of patients who underwent chest X-ray (CXR) and chest computed tomography (CCT), and the age and gender distribution of the cases who underwent chest imaging were compared according to the pre-pandemic (January 2019–February 2020), pandemic (March 2020–March 2022), and post-pandemic (April 2022–March 2023) periods. Total emergency admissions were similar in the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods (pre-pandemic period: 21,984 ± 2087; post-pandemic period: 22,732 ± 1701). Compared to the pre-pandemic period, the CCT rate increased (pre-pandemic period: 4.9 ± 0.9, post-pandemic period: 7.46 ± 1.2), and the CXR rate decreased (pre-pandemic period: 16.6 ± 1.7%, post-pandemic period: 13.3 ± 1.9%) in the post-pandemic period (p < 0.001). The mean age of patients who underwent chest imaging (CXR; Pre-pandemic period: 56.6 ± 1.1 years; post-pandemic period: 53.3 ± 5.6 years. CCT; Pre-pandemic period: 68.5 ± 1.7 years; post-pandemic period: 61 ± 4.0 years) in the post-pandemic period was lower than in the pre-pandemic period (p < 0.001). Chest imaging preferences in the emergency department have changed during the post-pandemic period. In the post-pandemic period, while younger patients underwent chest imaging in the emergency department, CCT was preferred, and the rate of CXR decreased. It is alarming for public health that patients are exposed to higher doses of radiation at a younger age.

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is one of the complications of acute pancreatitis (AP) with high mortality. A method to predict the development of WOPN in AP patients admitted to the emergency department may guide life-saving practices such as early initiation of antibiotic therapy and, when necessary, referral of the patient to a center where necrosectomy can be performed. This study is a prospective observational study. One hundred eleven AP patients who applied to the emergency department were included in the study. The mean of QT interval (QT) dispersion, systemic immune–inflammation Index (SII), multi-inflammatory index-I (MII-1), multi-inflammatory index-II (MII-2), and multi-inflammatory index-III (MII-3) were compared between patients who developed WOPN and patients who did not develop WOPN during their hospitalization. In the study, the mean of QT dispersion, SII, MII-1, MII-2, and MII-3 were significantly lower in the patient group who developed WOPN compared to those who did not develop WOPN. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, all methods except SII were found to be successful in predicting WOPN. QT dispersion, SII, MII-1, MII-2, and MII-3 are valuable tools that provide rapid results and successfully predict the development of WOPN in AP. However, MII-2 and QT dispersion appears to be slightly more successful than the others.