The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in social sciences research introduces both transformative potential and critical ethical dilemmas. This study examines the role of researchers as either ethical gatekeepers or pioneers of AI-driven change. Through a bibliometric analysis of 464 records from the Web of Science Core Collection, we identify key themes in ethical AI discourse using VOSviewer Version 1.6.20. The findings highlight dominant ethical concerns, including governance, bias, transparency, and fairness, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaborations and responsible AI frameworks. While AI offers efficiency and scalability in research, unresolved issues related to algorithmic bias, governance, and public trust persist. The overlay visualization underscores emerging trends such as generative AI, policy-driven governance, and ethical accountability frameworks. This study calls for a shift from passive oversight to proactive ethical stewardship in AI-driven social science research.

Background/Objectives: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) significantly affects mental health, with gender-specific differences being observed in psychological responses. This pilot study aimed to explore these differences in the demographic, clinical, psychological, psychiatric, and social profile of patients diagnosed with IHD. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional design was used, recruiting 183 adult patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease and depression at the Psychiatry Department of Arad County Emergency Hospital, Romania, between May 2021 and May 2024. Data were collected using a self-developed tool, named the Depression Assessment in Ischemic Heart Disease Questionnaire (DA-IHDQ), alongside standardized assessments. Statistical analysis was performed using JASP statistical software (Version 0.19.1, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands), employing binomial and multinomial tests for categorical data, and Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Results: This study found significant demographic differences, with female patients exhibiting higher levels of emotional distress and severe depression compared with the male subjects. Women reported greater social isolation and a stronger desire to seek for psychological or psychiatric support. Furthermore, a positive correlation between depression severity and physical symptoms was observed in both genders. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of recognizing gender-specific responses to IHD, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions in mental healthcare and cardiac rehabilitation. Future research should further explore these differences to enhance the understanding of the psychosocial/psychiatric aspects of IHD and improve patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Knee injuries and overuse-related disorders are common among athletes participating in jumping sports such as handball and basketball. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is increasingly used for the assessment of knee pathology; however, evidence regarding the prevalence and clinical relevance of ultrasonographic abnormalities in young athletes remains limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ultrasonographic knee abnormalities in young male handball and basketball athletes and to examine their association with pain intensity. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between June 2025 and June 2026 and included 69 competitive male athletes (35 handball players and 34 basketball players). All participants underwent bilateral knee ultrasonographic examination using a standardized assessment protocol and completed a questionnaire regarding demographic and training characteristics. Knee pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Comparisons between sports were performed using χ² and t-tests, while associations between participant-level ultrasonographic findings and pain were evaluated using independent-samples t-tests (or Mann–Whitney U tests, as appropriate), with Cohen’s d effect sizes and exploratory multivariable linear regression. Sensitivity analyses stratified by sport were additionally performed. Results: Patellar tendinopathy was the most prevalent ultrasonographic abnormality (21.0%), followed by medial meniscal abnormality (15.9%) and infrapatellar bursitis (13.0%). Athletes with patellar tendinopathy, medial meniscal abnormality, or infrapatellar bursitis had significantly higher VAS pain scores than athletes without the corresponding ultrasonographic abnormality. Patellar tendinopathy demonstrated the strongest association with participant-reported pain (VAS: 4.1 ± 1.3; Cohen’s d = 1.24; p < 0.001). Handball athletes exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of patellar tendinopathy than basketball athletes (34.3% vs. 11.8%; OR = 3.90, 95% CI: 1.09–13.95; p = 0.027). In multivariable regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, sport type, previous knee injury, and weekly training volume, patellar tendinopathy (β = 1.34, p < 0.001), medial meniscal abnormality (β = 0.70, p = 0.017), and infrapatellar bursitis (β = 0.54, p = 0.046) remained independently associated with higher pain scores. The regression model explained 39% of the variance in VAS pain scores (R² = 0.39). Conclusions: Ultrasonographic knee abnormalities are common among young male handball and basketball athletes and are significantly associated with pain intensity. Because ultrasonography has limited ability to characterize intra-articular pathology, particularly the menisci, the ultrasonographic abnormalities identified in this study should not be interpreted as definitive diagnoses, and MRI remains the reference imaging modality when comprehensive evaluation of intra-articular pathology is clinically indicated. Patellar tendinopathy was the most prevalent ultrasonographic abnormality and was most strongly associated with pain intensity. These findings support the use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography as a complementary imaging modality alongside clinical assessment in the evaluation of symptomatic athletes. However, prospective longitudinal studies are required to determine whether these ultrasonographic abnormalities have prognostic value for future pain, functional limitation, or time-loss injury.