Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether malrotation of lateral knee radiographs influences posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements.Methods: Lateral knee radiographs of all patients who underwent knee surgery at a single institution between June 2022 and January 2023 and received multiple lateral knee radiographs were included. Radiographs were categorised as malrotated lateral knee radiographs or lateral knee radiographs based on the radiographic distance between the medial and lateral posterior femoral condyles. Medial PTS (MPTS) and lateral PTS (LPTS) were evaluated on malrotated lateral knee radiographs and lateral knee radiographs and compared using the paired t test. Intra‐ and interrater reliability between four raters were assessed for MPTS and LPTS measurements.Results: A total of 92 lateral knee radiographs (46 pairs of malrotated lateral knee radiographs and lateral knee radiographs; 50.0% right side) from 46 patients (33.2 ± 12.4 years, 69.6% male) were included. Mean posterior femoral condyle distance in malrotated lateral knee radiographs was 8.1 ± 4.4 mm. Overall, MPTS and LPTS were significantly higher on malrotated lateral knee radiographs versus lateral knee radiographs (medial: 10.5 ± 3.2° vs. 9.7 ± 3.5°, p < 0.05; lateral: 10.6 ± 3.4° vs. 9.7 ± 3.3°, p < 0.05). Mean absolute difference between MPTS and LPTS on malrotated lateral knee radiographs versus lateral knee radiographs were |1.9| ± |1.5|° and |2.0| ± |1.8|°, respectively. Intrarater reliability was ‘moderate’ and interrater reliability was ‘good’ for both MPTS and LPTS.Conclusion: Malrotation of lateral knee radiographs led to a significant distortion of both the MPTS and LPTS. In clinical practice, attention should be placed on the (mal)rotation of lateral knee radiographs, especially in patients for whom a slope‐correcting osteotomy is being discussed.Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess clinical and radiological outcomes after two‐staged slope‐reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for recurrent ACL insufficiency with an increased posterior tibial Slope (PTS) > 12°.Methods: Patients operated in two centres between 01/2015 and 01/2022 were included after a minimum follow‐up of 24 months after revision ACLR. The postoperative pain and the following scores were obtained: IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, TAS. The Slope was measured using the Dejour technique postoperatively using lateral X‐rays being compared to a preoperative X‐ray. Also, a clinical examination including range of motion, anterior + posterior translation and pivot‐shift were performed. The Rolimeter was used for anterior tibial translation (ATT).Results: Twenty‐four patients (18 m, 6 f; age: 27 ± 8 y) were examined after a mean follow‐up of 34 ± 10 months. PTS was reduced from 15.2° ± 2.4° to 5.7° ± 3.8°. Scores at final follow‐up: IKDC 75.5 ± 1.5, Lysholm 79.9 ± 12.7, KOOS 77.5 ± 11.5, TAS was 5 (interquartile range 4–7). Postoperative Pain was significantly reduced (VAS: 4.0 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.3; p < 0.001). Compared to the contralateral side, ATT was higher in the operated knee (2.5 ± 2.9 mm; p = <0.01). Four patients underwent revision surgery (2x non‐traumatic instability; 2x traumatic ACL rupture). Additionally, 75% of patients returned to sports, while 64.3% of patients could return to their prior level.Conclusion: Combined slope‐reducing HTO and ACLR lead to good clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and a low failure rate. Patients were able to return to activity, but often at a lower sports level. Anterior tibial translation remains slightly increased compared to the healthy side.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study Level IV, case series.

Background: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and recurrence of instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in patients with anterior shoulder instability, with and without a GLAD lesion, while distinguishing between primary and recurrent instability. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent isolated ABR between January 2012 and December 2021 were included. Patients with a concomitant GLAD lesion were matched in with patients without a GLAD lesion according to the following criteria: age, sex, BMI, follow-up time, and primary versus recurrent instability. At minimum two-year follow-up, the clinical outcome (Rowe score, redislocation rate) and the functional outcome, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), satisfaction (1–10 scale, 0 = unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), were compared between groups. Results: In total, 28 patients (14 GLAD vs. 14 Bankart; age: 32.5 ± 13.0 years; sex: 92.9% male; BMI: 24.6 ± 2.2) were included 6.9 ± 2.8 (2–11) years after isolated ABR (follow-up rate 63.6%). Clinical and functional outcome did not differ significantly between patients with versus without GLAD lesions (ASES score: 100 [96.5–100] vs. 97.5 [93.3–100], p = 0.27); WOSI (%): 9.0 [3.7–24.5] vs. 3.8 [0.8–8.9], p = 0.22; Rowe score: 90.0 [75.0–100] vs. 95.0 [78.8–100], p = 0.57; OSIS: 46 [44.7–48] vs. 46 [43.0–48], p = 0.54; satisfaction: 8.9 ± 1.4 vs. 8.0 ± 1.4, p = 0.78; VAS 0 [0–1.3] vs. 0 [0–1.0]. In both groups, two patients (14.3%) reported a redislocation during the observation period. Conclusions: At short- to mid-term follow-up, ABR showed favorable outcomes, low dislocation rates, and high patient satisfaction, regardless of the presence of a GLAD lesion or primary versus recurrent instability. However, follow-up time was heterogeneous, and the follow-up rate was marginal.

Purpose: While traditional high tibial osteotomy (HTO) techniques primarily address malalignment in the coronal plane, the significance of sagittal plane alignment, particularly the posterior tibial slope (PTS), is not to be overlooked in the setting of cruciate ligament insufficiency. Combined deformities involving both the coronal plane and the sagittal plane are less common and present unique surgical challenges. This narrative review summarizes the literature and introduces tips and tricks for managing complex biplanar deformities through a case‐based discussion of different techniques. Methods: This narrative review includes preoperative planning, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes and illustrative clinical cases detailing surgical rationale and technical nuances in the correction of biplanar proximal tibial deformities. Emphasis is placed on the importance of accurate assessment and correction of biplanar deformities to optimize patient outcomes. Four representative technique presentations are included: (1) Hybrid HTO with a posterior opening wedge (POW) and anterior closing wedge (ACW), (2) asymmetrical medial closing wedge (MCW) HTO, (3) medial opening wedge (MOW) HTO with an anterolateral hinge and (4) a double HTO with both an infratuberosity ACW and high MOW. Conclusion: Biplanar HTO is a knee‐preserving surgical option for a small cohort of patients with complex knee deformities involving both the coronal and sagittal planes. Precise preoperative planning and meticulous surgical execution are essential to address these biplanar malalignments effectively. This narrative review serves as a guide for orthopaedic surgeons, highlighting key considerations when planning biplanar HTO and serves as a practical guide for complex cases. Level of Evidence: Level V.

Purpose: It is unclear whether different injury mechanisms lead to divergent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear locations. This study aims to analyse the relationship between bone bruise (BB) distribution or depth and ACL tear location.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 446 consecutive patients with acute non‐contact ACL injury was performed. Only patients with complete ACL tears verified during subsequent arthroscopy were included. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to classify BB location, BB depth, ACL tear location and concomitant injuries (medial/lateral meniscus and medial/lateral collateral ligament). Demographic characteristics included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), type of sport and time between injury and MRI. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of ACL tear location.Results: One hundred and fifty‐eight skeletally mature patients met the inclusion criteria. The presence of BB in the lateral tibial plateau was associated with a more distal ACL tear location (β = −0.27, p < 0.001). Less BB depth in the lateral femoral condyle showed a tendency towards more proximal ACL tears (β = −0.14; p = 0.054). Older age predicted a more proximal ACL tear location (β = 0.31, p < 0.001). No significant relationship was found between ACL tear location and gender, BMI, type of sport, concomitant injuries and time between injury and MRI.Conclusion: ACL tear location after an acute non‐contact injury is associated with distinct patterns of BB distribution, particularly involving the lateral compartment, indicating that different injury mechanisms may lead to different ACL tear locations.Level of Evidence: Level III.

Purpose: This study introduces the posterior tibial plateau offset (PTO). It was hypothesised that (1) the PTO is reliably quantifiable and (2) correlates with the posterior tibial slope (PTS). Methods: The study involved lateral radiographs of patients who sustained an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure and a control group. Exclusion criteria were skeletal immaturity, osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade > I), lateral radiographs with <15 cm of tibial shaft, or malrotated radiographs. The PTS was measured in both groups. The PTO was defined as the relative distance from the posterior tibial plateau to the tibial shaft axis in relation to the sagittal diameter of the tibial plateau (in%). Linear correlation assessed the PTS to PTO association. Results: A total of 146 patients (ACL graft failure, n = 103; control group, n = 43; 45% female, 60% left knees) were included. Mean overall PTO was 82% ± 7% (1%–35%), and mean PTS was 12° ± 3 (7–20). The PTS and PTO showed a moderate positive correlation in the overall collective ( r = 0.5; p < 0.001), ACL graft failure group ( r = 0.49; p < 0.001), and control group ( r = 0.69; p < 0.001), indicating a higher slope corresponded to a greater PTO. There was no statistical difference in PTO between the ACL failure and the control group (82% vs. 83%, p < 0.05). ICC between three raters was (0.8–0.9; p < 0.05). Conclusion: The PTO is a simple and repeatable measurement. A higher PTS is associated with a greater PTO, and the variability of the PTO across the patients with ACL graft failure and the control group was high. When planning osteotomy levels in the highly sloped proximal tibia, the PTO may be considered to optimise individualised planning for patients with failed ACL reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level V.