I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann

Prof. Dr. I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 December 2015 in Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMarc-André Weber
Marc-André Weber
RLRadhesh K. Lalam
Radhesh K. Lalam
Siegfried TrattnigSiegfried Trattnig
Siegfried Trattnig
KBKlaus Bohndorf
Klaus Bohndorf
FVFilip Vanhoenacker
Filip Vanhoenacker
INI.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, but early, accurate diagnosis with subsequent appropriate treatment is crucial for the clinical outcome. The ESSR guidelines are intended to help radiologists in their decision-making and support discussion among clinicians who deal with patients with suspected or proven soft tissue tumors. Potentially malignant lesions recognized by ultrasound should be referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which also serves as a preoperative local staging modality, with specific technical requirements and mandatory radiological report elements. Radiography may add information about matrix calcification and osseous involvement. Indeterminate lesions, or lesions in which therapy is dependent on histology results, should be biopsied. For biopsy, we strongly recommend referral to a specialist sarcoma center, where an interdisciplinary tumor group, with a specialized pathologist, radiologist, and the surgeon are involved. In sarcoma, a CT scan of the chest is mandatory. Additional staging modalities are entity-specific. There are no evidence-based recommendations for routine follow-up in surgically treated sarcomas. However, we would recommend regular follow-up with intervals dependent on tumor grade, for 10 years after the initial diagnosis. Approved by the ESSR MSK Tumour Subcommittee.

1 September 2010 in Investigative Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
INI.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
PSPavol Szomolanyi
Pavol Szomolanyi
VJVladimir Juras
Vladimir Juras
OKOliver Kraff
Oliver Kraff
MLMark E. Ladd
Mark E. Ladd
STSiegfried Trattnig
Siegfried Trattnig
The aim of this study was to determine the T1 relaxivities (r1) of 8 gadolinium (Gd)-based MR contrast agents in human blood plasma at 7 Tesla, compared with 3 Tesla. Eight commercially available Gd-based MR contrast agents were diluted in human blood plasma to concentrations of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 mmol/L. In vitro measurements were performed at 37°C, on a 7 Tesla and on a 3 Tesla whole-body magnetic resonance imaging scanner. For the determination of T1 relaxation times, Inversion Recovery Sequences with inversion times from 0 to 3500 ms were used. The relaxivities were calculated. The r1 relaxivities of all agents, diluted in human blood plasma at body temperature, were lower at 7 Tesla than at 3 Tesla. The values at 3 Tesla were comparable to those published earlier. Notably, in some agents, a minor negative correlation of r1 with a concentration of up to 2 mmol/L could be observed. This was most pronounced in the agents with the highest protein-binding capacity. At 7 Tesla, the in vitro r1 relaxivities of Gd-based contrast agents in human blood plasma are lower than those at 3 Tesla. This work may serve as a basis for the application of Gd-based MR contrast agents at 7 Tesla. Further studies are required to optimize the contrast agent dose in vivo.

1 November 2012 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
INI.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
VJVladimir Juras
Vladimir Juras
CPChristian W. A. Pfirrmann
Christian W. A. Pfirrmann
PSPavol Szomolanyi
Pavol Szomolanyi
SZStefan Zbyn
Stefan Zbyn
STSiegfried Trattnig
Siegfried Trattnig
Our results show that in vivo MR imaging of the human intervertebral disk with sodium imaging is feasible and can be performed at 7 T and suggest that sodium imaging and T2 mapping might help characterize different component changes, both of which relate to the Pfirrmann score. PurposeTo compare sodium imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks in asymptomatic volunteers at 7-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with quantitative T2 mapping and morphologic scoring at 3 T.Materials and MethodsFollowing ethical board approval and informed consent, the L2-3 to L5-S1 disks were examined in 10 asymptomatic volunteers (nine men, one woman; mean age, 30 years; range, 23–43 years). At 7 T, normalized sodium signal-to-noise ratios were calculated, by using region-of-interest analysis. At 3 T, T2 mapping was performed with a multiecho spin-echo sequence (repetition time msec/echo times msec, 1500/24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156). T2 values were calculated over the nucleus, with a pixelwise, monoexponential nonnegative least-squares–fit analysis. Morphologic grading according to a modified Pfirrmann score was assessed independently by three experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, and Pearson correlation analysis of the covariates was performed.ResultsThe mean normalized sodi...

7 December 2023 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
INI.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
FVFilip M. Vanhoenacker
Filip M. Vanhoenacker
JVJoan C. Vilanova
Joan C. Vilanova
ATAlberto S. Tagliafico
Alberto S. Tagliafico
MWMarc-André Weber
Marc-André Weber
JBJohannes L. Bloem
Johannes L. Bloem
Objectives: Early, accurate diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. To this end, standardization of imaging algorithms, technical requirements, and reporting is therefore a prerequisite. Since the first European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus in 2015, technical achievements, further insights into specific entities, and the revised WHO-classification (2020) and AJCC staging system (2017) made an update necessary. The guidelines are intended to support radiologists in their decision-making and contribute to interdisciplinary tumor board discussions. Materials and methods: A validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements were scored online by level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds. Either “group consensus,” “group agreement,” or “lack of agreement” was achieved. Results: Eight sections were defined that finally contained 145 statements with comments. Overall, group consensus was reached in 95.9%, and group agreement in 4.1%. This communication contains the first part consisting of the imaging algorithm for suspected soft tissue tumors, methods for local imaging, and the role of tumor centers. Conclusion: Ultrasound represents the initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small tumors. MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of most soft tissue tumors. CT is indicated in special situations. In suspicious or likely malignant tumors, a specialist tumor center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion. This should be done before performing a biopsy, without exception. Clinical relevance: The updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging, to support radiologists in their decision-making, and to improve examination comparability both in individual patients and in future studies on individualized strategies. Key Points: • Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors. • MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy. • In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy.

11 January 2015 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
INI.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
GAGabriele Amann
Gabriele Amann
Martin KrssakMartin Krssak
Martin Krssak
JPJoannis Panotopoulos
Joannis Panotopoulos
PSPavol Szomolanyi
Pavol Szomolanyi
Siegfried TrattnigSiegfried Trattnig
Siegfried Trattnig

27 October 2006 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
INI.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
I.-M. Noebauer-Huhmann
CGChristian Glaser
Christian Glaser
ODOlaf Dietrich
Olaf Dietrich
CWClaus-Peter Wallner
Claus-Peter Wallner
WKWolfgang Klinger
Wolfgang Klinger
SSStefan O. Schoenberg
Stefan O. Schoenberg