INTRODUCTION: The term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frequently applied to aerodigestive symptoms despite lack of objective reflux evidence. The aim of this initiative was to develop a modern care paradigm for LPR supported by otolaryngology and gastroenterology disciplines. METHODS: A 28-member international interdisciplinary working group developed practical statements within the following domains: definition/terminology, initial diagnostic evaluation, reflux monitoring, therapeutic trials, behavioral factors and therapy, and risk stratification. Literature reviews guided statement development and were presented at virtual/in-person meetings. Each statement underwent 2 or more rounds of voting per the RAND Appropriateness Method; statements reaching appropriateness with ≥80% agreement are included as recommendations. RESULTS: The term laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) applies to aerodigestive symptoms with potential to be induced by reflux and include cough, voice change, throat clearing, excess throat phlegm, and throat pain. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) refers to patients with LPS and objective evidence of reflux. Importantly, the presence of LPS does not equate to LPRD. Laryngoscopy has value in assessing for nonreflux laryngopharyngeal processes, but laryngoscopic findings alone cannot diagnose LPRD. LPS patients should be categorized as with or without concurrent esophageal reflux symptoms. While lifestyle modification and empiric trials of acid suppression ± alginates are appropriate when esophageal reflux symptoms coexist, upper endoscopy and ambulatory reflux monitoring are required for LPRD diagnosis when symptoms persist, when LPS is isolated, or when management needs to be escalated to include invasive antireflux management. The two recommended ambulatory reflux monitoring modalities, 24-hour pH-impedance and 96-hour wireless pH monitoring, are not mutually exclusive with distinct roles for the evaluation of LPS. Laryngeal hyperresponsiveness and hypervigilance commonly contribute to both LPS and LPRD presentations and are responsive to laryngeal recalibration therapy and neuromodulators. DISCUSSION: The San Diego Consensus represents the formal modern-day interdisciplinary care paradigm to evaluate and manage LPS and LPRD.

Importance Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is recommended for children and younger adults but not older adults or those with prior HPV exposure, leaving a large portion of the population at risk for HPV-mediated disease. Emerging data suggest a possible role for vaccination as an adjuvant treatment for individuals with HPV-related clinical disease. Objective To systematically review the literature regarding HPV vaccination for secondary disease prevention after treatment of active clinical disease across disease sites to serve as a platform for the management of HPV-related disease of the head and neck. Evidence Review A systematic search from August 3 to 21, 2015, of the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Biosis Citation Index, Current Contents Connect, Scientific Library Online, and Global Health databases used PRISMA guidelines to identify 326 relevant articles related to adjuvant use of HPV vaccination. Primary search terms were (HPV vaccineORhuman papillomavirus vaccineORpapillomarvirus vaccinesORalphapapillomavirus vaccine) AND (HPVORhuman papillomavirusORalphapapillomavirusORpapillomaviridaeORvirus wartsORwart virus) AND (recurrenceORrelapseORreoccurrenceORrecurrencesORrelapsesORrelapsing). Forty-five full texts in English were reviewed, with 19 articles included in the final review. In some studies, subpopulations of individuals with HPV DNA positivity and/or seropositivity were extracted for inclusion. Included studies were assessed for bias and separated based on the presence of active clinical disease or HPV DNA positivity or seropositivity. Findings Nineteen studies with 22 474 unique patients were included in the review. When HPV vaccination was used as an adjuvant treatment for active clinical disease, 9 of 12 studies reported decreased disease recurrence, decreased disease burden, or increased intersurgical interval. In contrast, none of the 7 studies of vaccination in individuals with HPV DNA positivity and/or seropositivity without clinical disease reported improved outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance Differences between adjuvant vaccination in HPV-mediated clinical disease and vaccination in HPV DNA–positive and/or HPV-seropositive populations posit underlying differences in disease and immune processes. These data suggest that additional evaluation of adjuvant HPV vaccination in individuals with active clinical disease is warranted.

Hospital readmissions are an important metric of quality and safety. This study seeks to characterize the relationship between readmissions and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A better understanding of this relationship could be utilized to develop preventative measures and reduce readmission rates. A retrospective review of patients discharged over a 24-month period to a Department of Defense hospital was conducted. Medical records review provided demographic data, presence of OSA and comorbid diseases, and whether readmission occurred within 30 days of discharge. Statistical analysis assessed risk factors for readmission, and multivariate analysis was performed. Next, 125 readmitted patients with OSA were randomly selected for detailed chart review and compared to a matched cohort that was not readmitted. Of 22,261 unique patients discharged, 1,899 (8.5%) were readmitted. Patients with OSA had a readmission rate of 11.4% versus 7.6% for patients without OSA (P < .00001). Multivariable analysis revealed an odds ratio of 1.46 for readmission in patients with OSA (P < .0001). For the detailed chart review of 250 patients, length of hospital stay differed for the readmitted and non-readmitted groups (5.1 versus 3.6 days; P = .007). Apnea-hypopnea index (24.1 versus 27.2 events/h; P = .48) was similar between the groups. Also, inpatient (27.2% versus 26.4%) and outpatient (38.4% versus 37.6%) positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment rates were not different. This study found OSA to be an independent risk factor for readmission within 30 days of discharge. PAP therapy appears to be underutilized in patients with known OSA. Additional studies are needed to define the relationship between OSA, PAP adherence, and hospital readmission.