Coffee is a key agricultural product in national and international markets. Physiological parameters, such as plant growth indicators, can signal interruptions in these processes. This study aimed to characterize the temperature obtained by a thermal camera embedded in a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) and evaluate its relationship with the water potential (WP) and stomatal conductance (gs) of an experimental coffee plantation using geostatistical techniques. The experiment was conducted at the Federal University of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil. A rotary-wing RPA with an embedded thermal camera flew autonomously at a height of 10 m and speed of 10 m/s. Images were collected on 26 November 2019 (rainy season), and 11 August 2020 (dry season), between 9:30 am and 11:30 am. Data on gs and WP were collected in the field. The thermal images were processed using FLIR Tools 5.13, and temperature analysis and spatialization were undertaken using geostatistical tools and isocolor maps by Kriging interpolation in R 4.3.2 software. Field data were superimposed on final crop temperature maps using QuantumGIS version 3.10 software. The study found that with decreasing WP, stomatal closure and reduction in gs occurred, increasing the temperature due to water deficit. The temperature distribution maps identified areas of climatic variations indicating water deficit.

This study characterizes a compost-bedded pack barn of a dairy cattle farm in terms of CO₂ emissions approximately 20 min after tilling under stable atmospheric conditions. Emission fluxes were calculated with the bLS model WindTrax, assessing modeled CO₂ concentrations at two altitudes (5.0 m and 10.0 m ABGL) by comparing them with those measured by a UAV-based system at the same two altitudes. The UAV-based system was equipped with a low-cost self-engineered MSP (multi-sensor platform) containing an NDIR sensor for measuring concentrations and detecting environmental conditions, which were measured both by MSPs and commercial sensors. The input data were provided by the same sensors positioned on the ground (1.5 m ABGL), upwind and downwind with respect to the emission source. A sensitivity analysis of atmospheric stability in the bLS model yielded differences between median calculated emission fluxes for stable and unstable conditions from −0.020 to 0.034 g ∙ m⁻² ∙ s⁻¹. Mean percentage errors gave overestimates of 8–39% and 13–21% 5.0 m and 10.0 m ABGL. The RMSE also indicated overestimates ranging from 44 to 275 ppm. This is the first study to validate concentrations calculated by a bLS model at two altitudes by using a UAV-based system on a compost-bedded pack barn.