Several relatively recently published studies have shown changes in plasma metabolites in various viral diseases such as Zika, Dengue, RSV or SARS-CoV-1. The aim of this study was to analyze the metabolome profile of patients during acute COVID-19 approximately one month after the acute infection and to compare these results with healthy (SARS-CoV-2-negative) controls. The metabolome analysis was performed by NMR spectroscopy from the peripheral blood of patients and controls. The blood samples were collected on 3 different occasions (at admission, during hospitalization and on control visit after discharge from the hospital). When comparing sample groups (based on the date of acquisition) to controls, there is an indicative shift in metabolomics features based on the time passed after the first sample was taken towards controls. Based on the random forest algorithm, there is a strong discriminatory predictive value between controls and different sample groups (AUC equals 1 for controls versus samples taken at admission, Mathew correlation coefficient equals 1). Significant metabolomic changes persist in patients more than a month after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The random forest algorithm shows very strong discrimination (almost ideal) when comparing metabolite levels of patients in two various stages of disease and during the recovery period compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative controls.

Background: COVID-19 represents a severe inflammatory condition. Our work was designed to monitor the longitudinal dynamics of the metabolomic response of blood plasma and to reveal presumable discrimination in patients with positive and negative outcomes of COVID-19 respiratory symptoms. Methods: Blood plasma from patients, divided into subgroups with positive (survivors) and negative (worsening condition, non-survivors) outcomes, on Days 1, 3, and 7 after admission to hospital, was measured by NMR spectroscopy. Results: We observed changes in energy metabolism in both groups of COVID-19 patients; initial hyperglycaemia, indicating lowered glucose utilisation, was balanced with increased production of 3-hydroxybutyrate as an alternative energy source and accompanied by accelerated protein catabolism manifested by an increase in BCAA levels. These changes were normalised in patients with positive outcome by the seventh day, but still persisted one week after hospitalisation in patients with negative outcome. The initially decreased glutamine plasma level normalised faster in patients with positive outcome. Patients with negative outcome showed a more pronounced Phe/Tyr ratio, which is related to exacerbated and generalised inflammatory processes. Almost ideal discrimination from controls was proved. Conclusions: Distinct metabolomic responses to severe inflammation initiated by SARS-CoV-2 infection may serve towards complementary personalised pharmacological and nutritional support to improve patient outcomes.

Metabolomics is a relatively new research area that focuses mostly on the profiling of selected molecules and metabolites within the organism. A SARS-CoV-2 infection itself can lead to major disturbances in the metabolite profile of the infected individuals. The aim of this study was to analyze metabolomic changes in the urine of patients during the acute phase of COVID-19 and approximately one month after infection in the recovery period. We discuss the observed changes in relation to the alterations resulting from changes in the blood plasma metabolome, as described in our previous study. The metabolome analysis was performed using NMR spectroscopy from the urine of patients and controls. The urine samples were collected at three timepoints, namely upon hospital admission, during hospitalization, and after discharge from the hospital. The acute COVID-19 phase induced massive alterations in the metabolic composition of urine was linked with various changes taking place in the organism. Discriminatory analyses showed the feasibility of successful discrimination of COVID-19 patients from healthy controls based on urinary metabolite levels, with the highest significance assigned to citrate, Hippurate, and pyruvate. Our results show that the metabolomic changes persist one month after the acute phase and that the organism is not fully recovered.

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is increasingly used as a treatment method for patients with respiratory failure. The first recommendations for the use of NIPPV in Slovakia were developed by the Slovak Society of Pulmonology and Phthisiology in 2007 and were partially revised in 2015. New scientific evidence prompted the present update, which is based on widely accepted international guidelines and was adapted to address local needs. Important features of the present update include a classification of acute indications for NIPPV into three categories based on the level of supporting evidence, namely 1. definite indications for in-hospital use of NIPPV; 2. possible indications for in-hospital use of NIPPV; and 3. disorders and states in which in-hospital use of NIPPV is not recommended. The current update also reflects the importance of comorbid sleep-related breathing disorders and other chronic respiratory conditions, as well as the use and limitations of continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Since oxygen therapy is often administered along with NIPPV, guidance on the safe use of oxygen in NIPPV-treated patients has also been included. Also, the present update extends the range of its users, addressing the needs of specialists in pediatric respiratory medicine as a novelty.