COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease) is an infectious disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2), which belongs to the genus Betacoronavirus. It was first identified in patients with severe respiratory disease in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. It mainly affects the respiratory system, and in severe cases causes serious lung infection or pneumonia, which can lead to the death of the patient. Clinical studies show that SARS-CoV-2 infection in critical cases causes acute tissue damage due to a pathological immune response. The immune response to a new coronavirus is complex and involves many processes of specific and non-specific immunity. Analysis of available studies has shown various changes, especially in the area of specific cellular immunity, including lymphopenia, decreased T cells (CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+), changes in the T cell compartment associated with symptom progression, deterioration of the condition and development of lung damage. We provide a detailed review of the analyses of immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 CTLA-4, TIGIT, BTLA, CD223, IDO-1 and VISTA on exhausted T cells in patients with asymptomatic to symptomatic stages of COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, this review may help to better understand the pathological T cell immune response and improve the design of therapeutic strategies for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Background: COVID-19 represents a severe inflammatory condition. Our work was designed to monitor the longitudinal dynamics of the metabolomic response of blood plasma and to reveal presumable discrimination in patients with positive and negative outcomes of COVID-19 respiratory symptoms. Methods: Blood plasma from patients, divided into subgroups with positive (survivors) and negative (worsening condition, non-survivors) outcomes, on Days 1, 3, and 7 after admission to hospital, was measured by NMR spectroscopy. Results: We observed changes in energy metabolism in both groups of COVID-19 patients; initial hyperglycaemia, indicating lowered glucose utilisation, was balanced with increased production of 3-hydroxybutyrate as an alternative energy source and accompanied by accelerated protein catabolism manifested by an increase in BCAA levels. These changes were normalised in patients with positive outcome by the seventh day, but still persisted one week after hospitalisation in patients with negative outcome. The initially decreased glutamine plasma level normalised faster in patients with positive outcome. Patients with negative outcome showed a more pronounced Phe/Tyr ratio, which is related to exacerbated and generalised inflammatory processes. Almost ideal discrimination from controls was proved. Conclusions: Distinct metabolomic responses to severe inflammation initiated by SARS-CoV-2 infection may serve towards complementary personalised pharmacological and nutritional support to improve patient outcomes.
Asthma is a common multifaceted respiratory disease with a major impact on quality of life. Despite increased insights into mechanisms underlying various asthma phenotypes/endotypes and the availability of targeted biologic treatment options, a substantial proportion of patients remains uncontrolled with risk of exacerbations, requiring systemic corticosteroids, and progressive disease. Current international guidelines advocate a personalized management approach to patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. The EUFOREA asthma expert panel was convened to discuss strategies to optimize asthma care, prevent systemic corticosteroids overuse and disease progression. In this meeting report, we summarize current concepts and recommendations and provide a rationale to implement personalized asthma management at earlier stages of the disease. The ultimate goal is to move away from the current "one-size-fits-most" concept, which focuses on a symptom-driven treatment strategy, and shift towards a phenotype/endotype-targeted approach aimed at curbing the disease course by improving clinical outcomes and preserving health-related quality of life.
Metabolomics is a relatively new research area that focuses mostly on the profiling of selected molecules and metabolites within the organism. A SARS-CoV-2 infection itself can lead to major disturbances in the metabolite profile of the infected individuals. The aim of this study was to analyze metabolomic changes in the urine of patients during the acute phase of COVID-19 and approximately one month after infection in the recovery period. We discuss the observed changes in relation to the alterations resulting from changes in the blood plasma metabolome, as described in our previous study. The metabolome analysis was performed using NMR spectroscopy from the urine of patients and controls. The urine samples were collected at three timepoints, namely upon hospital admission, during hospitalization, and after discharge from the hospital. The acute COVID-19 phase induced massive alterations in the metabolic composition of urine was linked with various changes taking place in the organism. Discriminatory analyses showed the feasibility of successful discrimination of COVID-19 patients from healthy controls based on urinary metabolite levels, with the highest significance assigned to citrate, Hippurate, and pyruvate. Our results show that the metabolomic changes persist one month after the acute phase and that the organism is not fully recovered.
The complement system is a key component of innate immunity, responsible for mediating the rapid clearance of pathogens and coordinating adaptive immune responses. Although complement activation is essential for effective infection control and prevention, its excessive or dysregulated function contributes to the pathogenesis of various immune-mediated disorders. Therefore, therapeutic inhibition of the overactive complement cascade, in which specific components are selectively blocked to suppress pathological activation, plays an important role in the treatment of various complement (immune)-mediated diseases. This article provides an overview of complement inhibition as a therapeutic strategy, highlighting the infectious risks associated with its use. Disruption of complement-dependent host defence mechanisms increases the risk of invasive infections (caused by encapsulated pathogens, e.g., Neisseria spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type B), which represent a significant clinical challenge. Therefore, the use of complement inhibition should not only be effective but also safe in combination with the application of all possible tools to prevent infections. Strategies, such as vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis, are crucial to minimise these complications, despite the persistence of the risk of breakthrough infections. Furthermore, this review examines advancements in patient risk stratification, evaluates alternative preventive measures, and identifies key gaps in current clinical practice. Future directions include improving monitoring protocols, creating more selective or locally acting complement inhibitors, and implementing biomarker-driven personalised therapies that maximise benefits while reducing side effects.