Virgilio Cruz-Machado

Prof. Dr. Virgilio Cruz-Machado


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2019 in Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VAVítor Alcácer
Vítor Alcácer
Virgilio Cruz-MachadoVirgilio Cruz-Machado
Virgilio Cruz-Machado

1 November 2011 in Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Susana M. Palavra GarridoSusana M. Palavra Garrido
Susana M. Palavra Garrido
Helena CarvalhoHelena Carvalho
Helena Carvalho
Virgilio Cruz-MachadoVirgilio Cruz-Machado
Virgilio Cruz-Machado

1 February 2012 in Computers & Industrial Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Helena CarvalhoHelena Carvalho
Helena Carvalho
ABAna Barroso
Ana Barroso
VMVirgínia H. Machado
Virgínia H. Machado
Susana M. Palavra GarridoSusana M. Palavra Garrido
Susana M. Palavra Garrido
Virgilio Cruz-MachadoVirgilio Cruz-Machado
Virgilio Cruz-Machado

1 December 2014 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKannan Govindan
Kannan Govindan
Susana M. Palavra GarridoSusana M. Palavra Garrido
Susana M. Palavra Garrido
Helena CarvalhoHelena Carvalho
Helena Carvalho
Virgilio Cruz-MachadoVirgilio Cruz-Machado
Virgilio Cruz-Machado

31 May 2011 in International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Helena CarvalhoHelena Carvalho
Helena Carvalho
Susana DuarteSusana Duarte
Susana Duarte
Virgilio Cruz-MachadoVirgilio Cruz-Machado
Virgilio Cruz-Machado
Purpose: This paper aims to explore the divergences and commitments between the lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms while investigating the effect of paradigms' practices within supply chain attributes.Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual model with lean, agile, resilient and green practices and supply chain management attributes is proposed. Causal diagrams were used to represent the relationships between paradigm practices and supply chain attributes. The four diagrams were aggregated to build the conceptual model.Findings: The conceptual model allows for the identification of synergies and divergences resulting from the paradigms practices implementation. The synergies between paradigms are related to “information frequency” and “integration level” increasing as well as reduction of “production lead time” and “transportation lead time”. However, other supply chain attributes such as “capacity surplus”, “inventory level” and “replenishment frequency” are affected in opposite directions by some paradigms creating divergences.Research limitations/implications: The model relationships were established using an anecdotal approach derived from the literature review, reflecting only a partial view of supply chain dynamics. More research related to other supply chain attributes and/or paradigm practices, and validation of the proposed relationships is suggested.Practical implications: The proposed model can be the basis for further research in lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms, contributing to a more sustainable and competitive lean supply chain with the necessary agility toward a quick response, resiliency to disruptions, and harmonization with the ecologic and environmental aspects.Originality/value: To the authors' knowledge this paper is the first to provide an understanding about the tradeoffs among lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain paradigms.

20 April 2012 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICIzunildo Cabral
Izunildo Cabral
AGAntonio Grilo
Antonio Grilo
Virgilio Cruz-MachadoVirgilio Cruz-Machado
Virgilio Cruz-Machado
In modern business environments, an effective supply chain management (SCM) is crucial to business continuity. Competition between supply chains (SC) has replaced the traditional competition between companies. Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green (LARG) paradigms are advocated as the foundation of a competitive SCM. To make a supply chain more competitive, capable of responding to the demands of customers with agility and capable of responding effectively to unexpected disturbance, in conjugation with environmental responsibilities and the necessity to eliminate processes that add no value, companies must implement a set of LARG SCM practices and key performance indicators (KPI) to measure their influence on the SC performance. However, the selection of the best LARG SCM practices and KPIs is a complex problem, involving dependencies and feedbacks. This paper proposes an integrated LARG analytic network process (ANP) model to support decision-making in choosing the most appropriate practices and KPIs to be implemented by companies in an SC. To validate the model in an exploratory approach, a case study in an automaker supply chain is presented.