Background: The United States (US) continues to face a substantial burden of cervical cancer, which has been the focus of many policies and public health prevention agendas. Of the numerous risk factors associated with cervical cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection remains the leading and most preventable cause of this chronic disease. Therefore, one major public health prevention strategy to decrease cervical cancer cases is HPV vaccination. Another screening tool that enables cervical cancer prevention and early intervention is the Pap smear, the primary method of screening for abnormal cervical cells. However, barriers such as social determinants of health and ineffective patient–provider communication hinder access to such critical preventive measures. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the knowledge level of US female adults, aged 21–65 years, concerning HPV infection and cervical cancer prevention using the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) database. Additionally, it assessed associations between patient–provider communication and the completion of Pap smear tests. Methods: Descriptive statistics were computed to explore the sociodemographic characteristics of female survey participants as well as to gather frequency and percentages of responses related to knowledge of HPV, awareness of the HPV vaccine, and history of Pap smear. Chi-squared tests were carried out to examine the associations between awareness of a cervical cancer vaccine or HPV shot and whether the participant has had a Pap smear, heard of the HPV vaccine, and knowledge of HPV’s association with cervical cancer. Next, binary logistic regression models were built to determine the size and direction of the association between patient–provider communication metrics and measures of (1) having had a Pap smear, (2) participant knowledge of HPV, (3) participant awareness of causality between HPV and cervical cancer, and (4) participant knowledge of HPV vaccine and cervical cancer prevention measures. Results: A substantial majority of participants (81.8%) reported having heard of HPV. Among them, 72.1% recognized that HPV could cause cervical cancer. Awareness of the HPV vaccine was reported by 88.1%, suggesting a relatively high reach of effective public health messaging. Regarding Pap tests, 43.3% of participants had undergone testing within the past year, but 12.6% had not been tested in over five years, and 3.6% have never been tested. Bivariate analysis using chi-squared tests revealed significant associations between participants’ history of Pap smears and their knowledge of HPV infection, its role in cervical cancer, and HPV vaccination as a prevention tool. Participants who had undergone a Pap test were more likely to have heard of HPV (p < 0.001), were knowledgeable of the HPV vaccine (p < 0.001), and were more aware of the HPV vaccine (p < 0.001). Participants reporting “never” for certain communication criteria significantly had an increased risk of having lower knowledge levels about the HPV vaccine and other cervical cancer prevention measures. They also had almost twice the risk of having lower knowledge levels about HPV prevention measures when reporting “never” (RR = 1.997, 95% CI (1.018–3.916) for “spending enough time with patients” compared to those selecting “always”. Additionally, participants responding “sometimes” (RR = 1.889, 95% CI (1.187–3.005) rather than “always” to feeling involved in healthcare decisions had a significantly higher risk of being unaware of the vaccine or other cervical cancer prevention measures. Conclusions: Strengthening provider communication and education skills not only encourages greater patient knowledge and adherence to preventative measures, such as HPV and cervical cancer screening, but also reduces disparities in healthcare stemming from limited health literacy.

Objectives: This scoping review aims to fill research gaps by exploring four guiding research questions. First, we aim to understand the major barriers encountered by U.S. menstruating college students in accessing menstrual health products at their educational institutions, households, and community. Second, we aim to identify social determinants of health (SDoH) that significantly influence and contribute to menstrual health inequities experienced by U.S. college students. Third, we aim to explore the measurement tools that have been used to assess menstrual health inequities experienced by U.S. menstruating college students. Lastly, we aim to determine the lessons learned and recommendations to improve overall menstrual health outcomes in U.S. menstruating college students. Study Design: This scoping review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework (2005) and incorporated recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results. Methods: The four databases searched were PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (Medline). Included articles were (1) published between 2000 and 2023, (2) focused on menstruating college students in the United States, (3) addressed menstrual health, menstrual equity, and period poverty in college campuses in the U.S., and/or (4) explored challenges encountered by menstruating college students in accessing menstrual health products. Results: A total of seven studies were retained for assessment. The most frequently cited Healthy People 2030 categories were economic stability (n = 5) and social and community context (n = 5). The most-cited barriers were sorted into the “Financial Constraints and Accessibility” (n = 13) theme category. Conclusions: Our study highlights practical applications and several recommendations for the future design, adoption, implementation, and evaluation of effective evidence-based interventions to address period poverty and subsequent barriers imposed by menstruating college students specific SDoH. More research is needed to further explore the health implications of menstrual health on mental, physical, and socioeconomic outcomes of menstruating individuals, particularly young adults experiencing different challenges as they venture into college and build their careers.

Background: Patient-centered communication is a critical process in high-quality healthcare that emphasizes the reciprocal sharing of information between providers and patients to ensure care aligns with the patient’s needs, preferences, and personal values. A significant challenge arises from the healthcare provider’s time constraints during clinical encounters and the lack of adequate training on how to adopt a patient-centered communication style that addresses patient concerns, making it difficult to foster an environment conducive to shared decision making. These issues are further exacerbated by cultural and language barriers, along with low levels of health literacy and social determinants of health (SDoHs), which complicate efforts to deliver patient-centered care. Objective: This study examined quality criteria for patient–provider communication (PPC) and their associations with sociodemographic characteristics and SDoHs on housing, transportation, and food insecurity. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-6) national dataset. Associations between PPC and sociodemographic variables were tested using the chi-squared test. Binary logistic regression was carried out to examine the association between three PPC criteria and each of the sociodemographic characteristics and patient comfort in disclosing information on SDoHs. Results: Bivariate analyses showed statistically significant associations for age, occupation status, marital status, Hispanic origin, and race across all three PPC criteria. Significant associations were reported for education and income for the two criteria related to being given the chance to ask questions and being involved in healthcare decisions. Finally, significant associations were reported for all PPC criteria and patient comfort levels in discussing SDoHs. Conclusions: Findings from this paper provide insight for enhancing the quality of PCC in underserved populations, particularly when it comes to informing the design of evidence-based cervical cancer screening interventions which are culturally centered around the patients’ needs and that integrate PPC as a foundational component.

Background: This systematic review has the following aims: (1) to identify measurement tools used globally by healthcare providers to diagnose PCOS in women at elevated risk; (2) to assess the comprehensiveness of these tools regarding mental health and chronic pain; (3) to list strategies for validating, disseminating, and implementing these tools; and (4) to provide future recommendations for experts in healthcare settings. Methods: This review utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the Arksey and O’Malley York methodology. Studies were sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, with inclusion criteria focusing on peer-reviewed articles addressing PCOS diagnosis and associated comorbidities. Data extraction and analysis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations. Results: A total of 63 studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that current screening tools for PCOS often lack comprehensive integration of mental health and chronic pain assessments. Tools like the PCOSQ and its updated version, PCOSQ-50, inadequately address pain-related symptoms, highlighting a gap in holistic patient evaluation. This review identified significant associations between PCOS and mental health disorders, including anxiety and depression, emphasizing the need for mental health screenings as part of PCOS management. Conclusions: There is a critical need for validated PCOS screening tools that encompass both physical and psychological aspects of the condition. Educating healthcare providers on the cultural and social determinants influencing PCOS can improve diagnosis and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on developing holistic screening tools and culturally relevant educational resources, aiming to enhance the overall quality of life for women with PCOS.

The purpose of this scoping review is to identify major social determinants of health and barriers affecting access to mental health services in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. It will also examine the scope of existing evidence-based interventions and dissemination and implementation strategies that were developed and implemented to increase accessibility to mental health treatment in high-risk pregnant and postpartum women. The Arksey and O’Malley Framework guided the review process, along with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. Additionally, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCR) was used as a reference checklist. A total of 21 studies were used for analysis that were published between 2015 and 2025. An examination of social determinants of health (SDOH) influencing factors of mental health determined that those related to neighborhood and built environment had the highest rates. Using the socioecological model, individual barriers exhibited the highest frequency, with the most common themes to these barriers across all studies being language barriers, cultural barriers, and stigma-related challenges, followed by financial and childcare challenges and transportation challenges. Major findings included important evidence that therapeutic relationships with pregnant women who are depressed can be developed and that telehealth interventions improved access for women living in rural areas. Recommendations from this review will inform evidence-based interventions to address the gap in accessibility and affordability of mental health services in US pregnant and postpartum women residing in underserved communities.

The purpose of this scoping review was to highlight major outcomes resulting from prenatal screening educational interventions in the U.S., identify limita