The dynamic development of new technologies enables the optimal computer technique choice to improve the required quality in today’s manufacturing industries. One of the methods of improving the determining process is machine learning. This paper compares different intelligent system methods to identify the tool wear during the turning of gray cast-iron EN-GJL-250 using carbide cutting inserts. During these studies, the experimental investigation was conducted with three various cutting speeds vc (216, 314, and 433 m/min) and the exact value of depth of cut a_p and federate f. Furthermore, based on the vibration acceleration signals, appropriate measures were developed that were correlated with the tool condition. In this work, machine learning methods were used to predict tool condition; therefore, two tool classes were proposed, namely usable and unsuitable, and tool corner wear VBc = 0.3 mm was assumed as a wear criterium. The diagnostic measures based on acceleration vibration signals were selected as input to the models. Additionally, the assessment of significant features in the division into usable and unsuitable class was caried out. Finally, this study evaluated chosen methods (classification and regression tree, induced fuzzy rules, and artificial neural network) and selected the most effective model.

This paper discusses the diagnostic models of tool wear during face milling of Aluminum Matrix Composite (AMC), classified as a difficult-to-cut material. Prediction and classification models were considered. The models were based on one-dimensional simple regression or on multidimensional regression trees, random forest, nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron neural networks. Measures of diagnostic signals obtained from measurements of cutting forces and vibration accelerations of the workpiece were used. The study demonstrated that multidimensional models outperformed one-dimensional models in terms of prediction accuracy and classification performance. Specifically, multidimensional predictive models exhibited lower maximum and average absolute prediction errors (0.036 mm vs. 0.050 mm and 0.026 mm vs. 0.045 mm, respectively), and classification models recorded fewer Type I and Type II errors. Despite the increased complexity, the higher predictive accuracy (up to 0.97) achieved with multidimensional models was shown to be suitable for industrial applications. However, simpler one-dimensional models offered the ad-vantage of greater reliability in signal acquisition and processing. It was also highlighted that the advantage of simple models from a practical point of view is the reduced complexity and consequent greater reliability of the system for acquiring and processing diagnostic signals.