Ground subsidence is one of geohazards, particularly in urban environment due to its negative impact to nearby buildings and civil infrastructures. This study investigates the amount and spatial distribution of ground subsidence in Incheon City, South Korea, where ground excavation was made. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) was used to monitor surface deformation around the excavation site. The study analyzed subsidence during an excavation project using Sentinel-1b satellite data, and the InSAR results were compared with traditional leveling methods and field measurements. Notable subsidence during the early construction phase was identified, which demonstrates the effectiveness of InSAR in urban environment. The research contributes to understanding of the excavation-inducing ground subsidence due to the reclamation layer.

This study examines the strategic incorporation of various recycled materials into asphalt concrete, specifically focusing on municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash (MSWI BA), recycled asphalt shingle (RAS), and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). Due to the high porosity of MSWI BA and RCA, and the significant asphalt binder content (30–40%) found in RAS, there is a need to increase the amount of liquid asphalt used. RAS is posited as an efficient substitute for the asphalt binder, helping to counterbalance the high absorption characteristics of MSWI BA and RCA. The research objective is to quantitatively evaluate the effect of the combined use of RAS, MSWI BA, and RCA in Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). This study encompasses several laboratory evaluations (i.e., rutting and tensile strength tests) and a cost–benefit analysis, which is a life cycle cost analysis. The results indicate that the combined use of these materials results in a higher tensile strength and rut resistance when compared with the control (with virgin aggregate). According to the cost–benefit analysis result, when the three recycled materials are used for an HMA overlay over an existing aged pavement, it could be 60–80% more cost-effective compared to a conventional HMA overlay, thereby offering significant economical savings each year in the field of road construction.

This study investigated the positive effect of the combined use of recycled asphalt shingles (RASs) and municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash (B.A.) in asphalt concrete, which contributes to enhanced sustainability in pavement engineering. In addition, unlike traditional approaches that employ individual recycling material in hot mix asphalt (HMA), the combined use of the two waste materials maximizes the mechanical performance of the asphalt mixture. The addition of RAS (with 30–40% aged binder) as an additive generally enhances the strength/stiffness of the asphalt mixture. The high porosity/absorption of MSWI BA results in an additional amount of liquid asphalt binder in the mixture. As an admixture, RAS could supply the additional asphalt binder in the mixture when MSWI BA is used as an aggregate replacement. This research was conducted in two phases: (1) to examine the effect of MSWI BA alone and its optimal asphalt content (OAC), and (2) to assess the combined effect of B.A. and RAS in HMA. Multiple laboratory testing methods were employed for the mechanical performance investigation, including the Marshall stability test, rutting test, and indirect tensile test. The testing results show that the 20% B.A. replacement exhibits the best performance and that it requires an additional asphalt binder of 1.1%. For the combined use of MSWI BA and RAS, 5% RAS shows the best mechanical performance. All mixtures that contain the B.A. and RAS show greater strength than the control specimen (regular HMA).

Edge-oxidized graphene oxide (EOGO) is a nano-sized material that is chemically stable and easily mixed with water due to its hydrophilic properties; thus, it has been used in various engineering fields, particularly for the reinforcement of building and construction materials. In this study, the effect of EOGO in soil reinforcement was investigated. When mixed with soil, it affects the mechanical properties of the soil–GO mixture. Various amounts of the GO (0%, 0.02%, 0.06%, 0.1%) were added into the sand–clay mixture, and their geotechnical properties were evaluated via multiple laboratories testing methods, including a standard Proctor test, direct shear test, compressibility test, and contact angle measurement. The experimental results show that with the addition of EOGO in soil of up to 0.06% EOGO, the compressibility decreases, the shear strength increases, and the maximum dry density (after compaction) increases.