Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy is an emerging surgical technique in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We examined outcomes across open, laparoscopic, and robotic LDLT using a prospective registry. We analyzed 3,448 cases (1,724 donor-recipient pairs) from Jan 2011 to Mar 2023 (NCT06062706). Among donors, 724 (42%) were female. Adult-to-adult LDLT comprised 1,061 (62%) cases. 646 (37%) of the donors underwent open, 165 (10%) laparoscopic, and 913 (53%) robotic hepatectomies. donor overall morbidity was 4% (35/903) for robotic, 8% (13/165) laparoscopic, and 16% (106/646) open (p<0.001). Pediatric and adult recipient mortality was similar among the three donor hepatectomy approaches; robotic 1.5% and 7.0%, compared to 2.3% and 8.3% laparoscopic and 1.6% and 5.5% for open donor surgery, respectively (p=0.802, p=0.564). pediatric and adult recipient major morbidity after robotic hepatectomy was 15% and 23%, compared to 25% and 44% laparoscopic and 19% and 31% for open surgery, respectively (p=0.033, p<0.001). Graft and recipient 5-year survival was 90% and 93% for pediatric and 79% and 80% for adults, respectively. In conclusion, robotic LDLT was associated with superior outcomes when compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches. Both donors, and for the first time reported, recipients benefitted with lower morbidity rates in robotic surgery, emphasizing its potential in further advancing this field. RAC 2121012 CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT06062706.

In living-donor liver transplantation, biliary complications including bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures remain significant challenges, with incidences varying across different centers. This multicentric retrospective study (2016-2020) included 3633 adult patients from 18 centers and aimed to identify risk factors for these biliary complications and their impact on patient survival. Incidences of bile leaks and biliary strictures were 11.4% and 20.6%, respectively. Key risk factors for bile leaks included multiple bile duct anastomoses (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.8), Roux-en-hepaticojejunostomy (OR 1.4), and a history of major abdominal surgery (OR 1.4). For biliary anastomotic strictures, risk factors were ABO-incompatibility (OR 1.4), blood loss >1 liter (OR 1.4), and previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.7). Patients experiencing biliary complications had extended hospital stays, increased incidence of major complications, and higher Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) scores. The impact on graft survival became evident after accounting for immortal time bias using time-dependent covariate survival analysis. Bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures were associated with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.7 and 1.8 for graft survival, respectively. The study underscores the importance of minimizing these risks through careful donor selection and preoperative planning, as biliary complications significantly affect graft survival despite available effective treatments.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and its resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread to millions of people worldwide. Preliminary data from organ transplant recipients have shown reduced seroconversion rates after the administration of different SARS-CoV-2 vaccination platforms. However, it is unknown whether different vaccination platforms provide different levels of protection against SARS-CoV-2. To answer this question, we prospectively studied 431 kidney and liver transplant recipients (kidney: n = 230; liver: n = 201) who received either the ChAdOx1 vaccine (n = 148) or the BNT-162b2 vaccine (n = 283) and underwent an assessment of immunoglobulin M/immunoglobulin G spike antibody levels. The primary objective of the study is to directly compare the efficacy of two different vaccine platforms in solid organ transplant recipients by measuring of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the RBD of the spike protein (anti-RBD) two weeks after first and second doses. Our secondary endpoints were solicited specific local or systemic adverse events within 7 days after the receipt of each dose of the vaccine. There was no difference in the primary outcome between the two vaccine platforms in patients who received two vaccine doses. Unresponsiveness was mainly linked to diabetes. The rate of response after the first dose among younger older patients was significantly larger; however, after the second dose this difference did not persist (p = 0.079). Side effects were similar to those that were observed during the pivotal trials.

Early allograft failure (EAF) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains a clinical challenge. Existing prediction models developed for deceased donor transplantation poorly apply to LDLT due to distinct surgical and physiological factors. This study identifies clinical determinants of EAF and develops an LDLT-specific prediction model. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study from 17 high-volume LDLT centers (January 2016–December 2020) with external validation at a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia (January 2015–December 2022). The primary outcome was EAF (graft loss or patient death ≤90 d). Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified preoperative/intraoperative risk factors. The EAGLE-LDLT model was constructed using postoperative laboratory values. Performance was compared against established models (EAD, MEAF, A2ALL) using ROC analysis and decision curve analysis. The development cohort included 2944 adult LDLT recipients (67.7% male; median age 55 y; median MELD 14) with a 5.5% EAF rate. External validation included 1020 recipients (median MELD 21, 6.7% EAF). Independent risk factors for EAF were MELD (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04–1.08), donor BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.10), portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13–2.63), and hepaticojejunostomy (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06–2.36). The EAGLE-LDLT model incorporating peak ALT (>468 U/L), peak INR (>1.9), and bilirubin (>3.5 mg/dL) and INR (>1.3) at POD7, demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC=0.81) compared with MEAF (AUC=0.77, p =0.004), EAD (AUC=0.67, p <0.001), and A2ALL (AUC=0.65, p <0.001). EAGLE-LDLT achieved balanced sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (73.7%), effectively stratifying patients into high-risk (15% of patients; 40.4% EAF incidence) and low-risk groups. Preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors predict EAF in LDLT. The EAGLE-LDLT model accurately identifies LDLT recipients at the highest risk for EAF postoperatively.

Background: Despite several challenges in clinical management, there has been significant progress in understanding the aetiology, natural history and outcomes of Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) treatments. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using covered stent in management of BCS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 70 BCS patients who underwent TIPS using covered stents between January 2010 and December 2022 at a single tertiary liver transplant centre. Patients’ clinical features, laboratory parameters, and imagine findings were collected before and after TIPS. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: TIPS was performed on 70 patients with BCS out of a total of 88 patients. The remaining patients (18) underwent liver transplantation. The mean age was 37.7 ± 11.2 years at time of diagnosis and the majority were female (64.35). The most common symptoms and signs at presentation were abdominal pain, jaundice, ascites, and variceal bleeding. Over a median followup of 76 months, the survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 98.8%, 97.9%, and 97.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent TIPS alone had better survival that patients with BCS who required liver transplantation (LTx) (p = 0.003). Conclusions: In our study TIPS provided a highly effective treatment option for BCS patients. The long-term favourability of the outcome was not impacted by the need for repeated TIPS revision. Use of covered stents was instrumental in reducing shunt dysfunction rates. Prospective and larger studies are needed to further optimize therapeutic strategies in this challenging population.