In living-donor liver transplantation, biliary complications including bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures remain significant challenges, with incidences varying across different centers. This multicentric retrospective study (2016-2020) included 3633 adult patients from 18 centers and aimed to identify risk factors for these biliary complications and their impact on patient survival. Incidences of bile leaks and biliary strictures were 11.4% and 20.6%, respectively. Key risk factors for bile leaks included multiple bile duct anastomoses (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.8), Roux-en-hepaticojejunostomy (OR 1.4), and a history of major abdominal surgery (OR 1.4). For biliary anastomotic strictures, risk factors were ABO-incompatibility (OR 1.4), blood loss >1 liter (OR 1.4), and previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.7). Patients experiencing biliary complications had extended hospital stays, increased incidence of major complications, and higher Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) scores. The impact on graft survival became evident after accounting for immortal time bias using time-dependent covariate survival analysis. Bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures were associated with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.7 and 1.8 for graft survival, respectively. The study underscores the importance of minimizing these risks through careful donor selection and preoperative planning, as biliary complications significantly affect graft survival despite available effective treatments.

Posttransplant HCC recurrence significantly impacts survival, yet its management is challenging due to limited evidence. With recent advancements in HCC treatment, updated data on managing recurrent diseases are needed. In this retrospective study across 6 centers (2000–2022), we employed Cox proportional-hazards regression and log-rank tests to assess survival differences. A prognostic score model was developed to categorize patient survival. The efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors was evaluated through propensity score matching. In our study, 431 of 3349 (14%) patients with HCC who underwent transplantation developed recurrence within a median interval of 18 (IQR: 9–32) months. One hundred forty-seven (34%) underwent curative-intent treatments, 207 (48%) received palliative treatments, and 77 (18%) were given best-supportive care. Patients undergoing curative-intent treatments had better survival from the time of recurrence with a median survival of 45 (95% CI: 36–63) months and 1/3/5-year survival of 90%/56%/43% compared to those receiving noncurative treatments (median: 11 [95% CI: 10–13] mo, 1/3/5-y survival of 46%/10%/7%, log-rank p < 0.001). Patients with recurrence diagnosed in the era 2018–2022 showed improved survival over the previous era (HR 0.64 [95% CI: 0.47–0.86]). Multivariable analysis identified 5 prognostic factors: ineligibility for curative-intent treatment (HR: 3.5 [95% CI: 2.7–4.6]), recurrence within 1 year (HR: 1.7 [95% CI: 1.3–2.1]), poor tumor differentiation (HR: 1.5 [95% CI: 1.1–1.9]), RETREAT score ≥3 (HR: 1.4 [95% CI: 1.1–1.8]), and alpha-fetoprotein at recurrence ≥400 ng/mL (HR: 1.4 [95% CI: 1.1–1.9]). These factors contributed to a prognostic scoring system (0–9) that stratified patients into 3 prognosis groups. Both propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable regression indicated that lenvatinib was not statistically superior to sorafenib in terms of efficacy. Curative-intent treatments should be advocated for patients with posttransplant recurrence whenever possible. Prognostic factors linked to aggressive tumor biology significantly influence survival. Advancements in HCC management have improved survival outcomes over the past 5 years.

Early allograft failure (EAF) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains a clinical challenge. Existing prediction models developed for deceased donor transplantation poorly apply to LDLT due to distinct surgical and physiological factors. This study identifies clinical determinants of EAF and develops an LDLT-specific prediction model. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study from 17 high-volume LDLT centers (January 2016–December 2020) with external validation at a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia (January 2015–December 2022). The primary outcome was EAF (graft loss or patient death ≤90 d). Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified preoperative/intraoperative risk factors. The EAGLE-LDLT model was constructed using postoperative laboratory values. Performance was compared against established models (EAD, MEAF, A2ALL) using ROC analysis and decision curve analysis. The development cohort included 2944 adult LDLT recipients (67.7% male; median age 55 y; median MELD 14) with a 5.5% EAF rate. External validation included 1020 recipients (median MELD 21, 6.7% EAF). Independent risk factors for EAF were MELD (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04–1.08), donor BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.10), portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13–2.63), and hepaticojejunostomy (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06–2.36). The EAGLE-LDLT model incorporating peak ALT (>468 U/L), peak INR (>1.9), and bilirubin (>3.5 mg/dL) and INR (>1.3) at POD7, demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC=0.81) compared with MEAF (AUC=0.77, p =0.004), EAD (AUC=0.67, p <0.001), and A2ALL (AUC=0.65, p <0.001). EAGLE-LDLT achieved balanced sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (73.7%), effectively stratifying patients into high-risk (15% of patients; 40.4% EAF incidence) and low-risk groups. Preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors predict EAF in LDLT. The EAGLE-LDLT model accurately identifies LDLT recipients at the highest risk for EAF postoperatively.

Resection and yttrium-90 radioembolization as sequential downstaging to living donor liver transplantation for large, multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma with lobar portal vein tumor thrombosis

The Meso-Rex bypass (MRB) is recognized as an effective treatment for portal hypertension secondary to extrahepatic portal vein occlusion (EHPVO) both in the pediatric and adult population, within or outside the context of liver transplantation. It is the preferred surgical treatment in most centers because not only does it addresses the portal hypertension, but also restores physiologic portal hepatopetal flow. However, the Rex recess, the landmark for this technique, may not be safely accessible in some patients. We present a 22-year-old male who underwent living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for neonatal hepatitis. He presented with variceal bleeding due to EHPVO at 13 years after transplant. Various endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical interventions were employed to address the recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, but results have been unsatisfactory. We performed a meso-intrahepatic portal vein bypass (MIPVB), an innovative alternative to the MRB, for this patient with extensive post-operative adhesions, perihilar collaterals, and cavernous transformation. MIPVB creation in patients where the Rex recess is inaccessible is technically challenging. But with a multidisciplinary team approach, meticulous preoperative planning, and close follow-up, the authors have demonstrated that it is a safe and feasible option for patients with late-onset EHPVO after liver transplantation.

Itsuko Chih-Yi Chen, Chao-Long Chen, Chee-Chien Yong, Yu-Fan Cheng. Korean J Transplant 2023;37:194. https://doi.org/10.4285/ATW2023.F-7787