Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) affect approximately two billion people worldwide and most of them reside in low- and middle-income countries. In these countries, additional causes of anemia include parasitic infections like malaria, other nutritional deficiencies, chronic diseases, hemoglobinopathies and lead poisoning. Maternal anemia in resource-poor nations is associated with low birth weight, increased perinatal mortality and decreased work productivity. Maintaining a normal iron balance in these settings is challenging, as iron-rich foods with good bioavailability are of animal origin that are expensive and/or available in short supply. Apart from infrequent consumption of meat, inadequate vitamin C intake and diets rich in inhibitors of iron absorption are additional important risk factors for IDA in low-income countries. In-home iron fortification of complementary foods with micronutrient powders has been shown to effectively reduce the risk of iron deficiency and IDA in infants and young children in developing countries but is associated with unfavorable changes in gut flora and induction of intestinal inflammation that may lead to diarrhea and hospitalization. In developed countries, iron deficiency is the only frequent micronutrient deficiency. In the industrialized world, IDA is more common in infants beyond the sixth month of life, in adolescent females with heavy menstrual bleeding, in women of childbearing age and elderly people. Other special at-risk populations for IDA in developed countries are regular blood donors, endurance athletes and vegetarians. Several medicinal ferrous or ferric oral iron products exist, and their use is not apparently associated with harmful effects on the overall incidence of infectious illnesses in sideropenic and/or anemic subjects. Further research is needed to clarify the risks and benefits of supplemental iron for children exposed to parasitic infections in the third world, and for children genetically predisposed to iron overload.

The cornea, as the outermost layer of the eye, plays a crucial role in vision by focusing light onto the retina. Various diseases and injuries can compromise its clarity, leading to impaired vision. This review aims to provide a thorough overview of the pharmacological properties, therapeutic potential and associated risks of Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitors in the management of corneal diseases. The article focuses on four key ROCK inhibitors: Y-27632, fasudil, ripasudil, and netarsudil, providing a comparative examination. Studies supporting the use of ROCK inhibitors highlight their efficacy across diverse corneal conditions. In Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy, studies on the application of Y-27632, ripasudil, and netarsudil demonstrated noteworthy enhancements in corneal clarity, endothelial cell density, and visual acuity. In pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, the injection of Y-27632 together with cultured corneal endothelial cells into the anterior chamber lead to enhanced corneal endothelial cell density and improved visual acuity. Animal models simulating chemical injury to the cornea showed a reduction of neovascularization and epithelial defects after application of fasudil and in a case of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome netarsudil improved corneal edema. Addressing safety considerations, netarsudil and ripasudil, both clinically approved, exhibit adverse events such as conjunctival hyperemia, conjunctival hemorrhage, cornea verticillata, conjunctivitis, and blepharitis. Monitoring patients during treatment becomes crucial to balancing the potential therapeutic benefits with these associated risks. In conclusion, ROCK inhibitors, particularly netarsudil and ripasudil, offer promise in managing corneal diseases. The comparative analysis of their pharmacological properties and studies supporting their efficacy underscore their potential therapeutic significance. However, ongoing research is paramount to comprehensively understand their safety profiles and long-term outcomes in diverse corneal conditions, guiding their optimal application in clinical practice.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss globally, with early detection and intervention critical to preventing severe outcomes. This narrative review examines the role of retinal biomarkers—molecular and imaging—in improving early diagnosis, tracking disease progression, and advancing personalized treatment for DR. Key biomarkers, such as inflammatory and metabolic markers, imaging findings from optical coherence tomography and fluorescence angiography and genetic markers, provide insights into disease mechanisms, help predict progression, and monitor responses to treatments, like anti-VEGF and corticosteroids. While challenges in standardization and clinical integration remain, these biomarkers hold promise for a precision medicine approach that could transform DR management through early, individualized care.

Over the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfields, deep learning and machine learning, have become integral parts of ophthalmology, particularly in the field of ophthalmic imaging. A diverse array of algorithms has emerged to facilitate the automated diagnosis of numerous medical and surgical retinal conditions. The development of these algorithms necessitates extensive training using large datasets of retinal images. This approach has demonstrated a promising impact, especially in increasing accuracy of diagnosis for unspecialized clinicians for various diseases and in the area of telemedicine, where access to ophthalmological care is restricted. In parallel, robotic technology has made significant inroads into the medical field, including ophthalmology. The vast majority of research in the field of robotic surgery has been focused on anterior segment and vitreoretinal surgery. These systems offer potential improvements in accuracy and address issues such as hand tremors. However, widespread adoption faces hurdles, including the substantial costs associated with these systems and the steep learning curve for surgeons. These challenges currently constrain the broader implementation of robotic surgical systems in ophthalmology. This mini review discusses the current research and challenges, underscoring the limited yet growing implementation of AI and robotic systems in the field of retinal conditions.

Glaucoma is a group of eye conditions characterised by optic nerve damage and visual field loss, representing the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Glaucoma exerts substantial global impact on visual impairment and blindness. The management of glaucoma has traditionally relied on medications such as prostaglandin analogs, beta-blockers, alpha agonists, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, which aim to lower intraocular pressure through various mechanisms. Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors have recently emerged as a novel class of antiglaucoma drugs, offering an alternative approach by enhancing aqueous humour outflow through the conventional pathway. Recent clinical studies assessing the efficacy and safety of Ripasudil (K-115) and Netarsudil (AR-13324) have demonstrated promising outcomes in the treatment of various types of glaucoma. Comparative studies have shown that ROCK inhibitors are non-inferior to traditional antiglaucomatous medications, such as beta-blockers and prostaglandins. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests their neuroprotective properties, which may play a role in preserving retinal ganglion cells. Furthermore, positive outcomes have been observed when these agents are used in conjunction with glaucoma filtering surgery, potentially enhancing surgical success rates. Adverse effects, including conjunctival hyperemia, cornea verticillata, conjunctivitis, and blepharitis, have been reported following the use of ROCK inhibitors. However, those side effects appear to be subtle in most cases. This review aims to provide an overview of ROCK inhibitors, focusing on their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and additional benefits for eye health. Furthermore, further potential applications of ROCK inhibitors in glaucoma management are going to be discussed.

Background: MNREAD is an advanced near-vision acuity chart that has already been translated and validated in Greek language. Considering that no validated Greek digital near-vision test exists, our primary objective was to develop and validate a digital near-vision reading test based on the fundamental properties of the Greek printed MNREAD (MNREAD-GR). Methods: This is a prospective, comparative study. A digital near-vision chart was developed (Democritus Digital Acuity Reading Test – DDART) with text size calibration, audio recording for automatic reading timing, as well as automatic calculation of reading acuity (RA), maximum reading speed (MRS), critical print size (CPS) and reading accessibility index (ACC). Normal and low vision subjects participated in the validation process, responding to MNREAD-GR and DDART at the same day, at a 40 cm viewing distance. Differences in all parameters between the charts were compared with t-test and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Within 15 days, all participants responded again to DDART in a different set of sentences to assess its test-retest reliability. Results: One hundred patients (normal vision group - NVG: 70 patients; low vision group - LVG: 30 patients) responded to both reading tests. Non-significant differences were detected for all parameters between DDART and MNREAD-GR except for MRS and ACC that were significantly higher in MNREAD-GR in NVG (p < 0.01). NVG participants demonstrated sufficient ICCs that ranged from 0.854 to 0.963, while LVG demonstrated ICCs for RA, ACC, MRS and CPS equal to 0.986, 0.894, 0.794 and 0.723, respectively. All parameters calculated with DDART demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICCs: 0.903 – 0.956). Conclusions: The proposed reading test presented comparable validity and repeatability to MNREAD-GR suggesting that it can be used both in normal and low vision Greek patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04242836. Registered 24 January 2020 – Retrospectively registered.