Glaucoma is a group of eye conditions characterised by optic nerve damage and visual field loss, representing the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Glaucoma exerts substantial global impact on visual impairment and blindness. The management of glaucoma has traditionally relied on medications such as prostaglandin analogs, beta-blockers, alpha agonists, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, which aim to lower intraocular pressure through various mechanisms. Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors have recently emerged as a novel class of antiglaucoma drugs, offering an alternative approach by enhancing aqueous humour outflow through the conventional pathway. Recent clinical studies assessing the efficacy and safety of Ripasudil (K-115) and Netarsudil (AR-13324) have demonstrated promising outcomes in the treatment of various types of glaucoma. Comparative studies have shown that ROCK inhibitors are non-inferior to traditional antiglaucomatous medications, such as beta-blockers and prostaglandins. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests their neuroprotective properties, which may play a role in preserving retinal ganglion cells. Furthermore, positive outcomes have been observed when these agents are used in conjunction with glaucoma filtering surgery, potentially enhancing surgical success rates. Adverse effects, including conjunctival hyperemia, cornea verticillata, conjunctivitis, and blepharitis, have been reported following the use of ROCK inhibitors. However, those side effects appear to be subtle in most cases. This review aims to provide an overview of ROCK inhibitors, focusing on their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and additional benefits for eye health. Furthermore, further potential applications of ROCK inhibitors in glaucoma management are going to be discussed.

The bimatoprost intracameral implant (Durysta^®) offers a sustained-release approach to glaucoma management, providing consistent intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction over several months and reducing the need for daily topical therapies. This review evaluates its pharmacology, efficacy, and safety, using data from pivotal clinical trials and recent real-world studies. The implant achieves IOP reductions comparable to topical prostaglandin analogs, with benefits for patient adherence and fewer common side effects. However, repeat administrations are associated with adverse effects such as endothelial cell loss, highlighting the need for optimized re-dosing schedules. Future research should explore its use in advanced glaucomas, cost-effectiveness, and combination with other IOP-lowering treatments. The bimatoprost intracameral implant represents a promising innovation in glaucoma therapy with potential for improved patient outcomes.

Age-related macular degeneration (AΜD) remains a leading cause of irreversible vision loss. Ιn neovascular AΜD (nAΜD), frequent intravitreal anti-VΕGF injections create substantial treatment burden, while approved therapies for geographic atrophy (GA) provide modest slowing of progression. Ocular gene therapy aims to achieve sustained intraocular expression of therapeutic proteins after a single administration. Τhis review summarises the biological rationale, vector platforms, and delivery routes relevant to AΜD, with emphasis on adeno-associated virus (AAV) systems, capsid engineering, and compartment-specific administration (intravitreal, subretinal, and suprachoroidal). We synthesise the clinical landscape for sustained anti-VΕGF expression approaches in nAΜD and complement-modulating strategies for GA, and highlight how trials increasingly prioritise injection-burden reduction, anatomical endpoints, and biomarkers of target engagement. Κey challenges include intraocular inflammation and neutralising antibodies (particularly with intravitreal dosing), variability and durability of transgene expression, surgical risks associated with subretinal delivery, and practical constraints related to manufacturing scale, cost, and long-term safety surveillance for non-removable therapies. Overall, gene therapy offers a plausible route towards durable, mechanism-targeted AΜD management, but its clinical role will depend on robust controlled trials and multi-year follow-up.

Intravitreal inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has transformed the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion, but frequent monitoring and retreatment remain major burdens. Ocular half-life is often used as shorthand for durability, although the clinical interval is produced by a wider molecular and biological system. This narrative review examines how dose, molecular format, hydrodynamic size, binding affinity, valency, ligand spectrum, target turnover, tissue distribution and delivery architecture determine the time for which an eye remains controlled. Human ocular pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evidence is interpreted according to compartment, assay and model provenance, with particular attention to the distinction between drug elimination, free-ligand suppression, anatomical control and protocol-assigned treatment interval. Trial evidence for ranibizumab, aflibercept, conbercept, brolucizumab and faricimab shows that extended dosing can arise from greater starting exposure, altered binding architecture or pathway expansion without a proportionate change in intrinsic ocular half-life. Patient phenotype and retreatment rules further modify the observed interval. Refillable reservoirs, biodegradable depots and ocular gene therapy change the governing kinetics from bolus elimination to controlled release or sustained local production, thereby increasing the importance of reversibility and cumulative safety. We propose that durability be defined as a time-to-threshold phenotype integrating active target-site exposure, biological demand, anatomical recurrence, all treatment-related procedures and safety. Standardised estimands, longitudinal human ocular sampling, spatial exposure methods and externally validated mechanism-informed models are needed to make molecular durability comparable and clinically actionable.

Purpose: To examine the seasonality of retinal detachment (RD) and explore global patterns and contributing factors through a narrative review. Methods: Studies investigating seasonal trends in RD incidence across diverse regions were analysed for peak seasons, meteorological influences, and behavioural factors. Results: RD seasonality varies by region. Northern climates (e.g., Finland) report summer peaks linked to prolonged daylight, while warmer climates (e.g., Kuwait) show winter peaks associated with outdoor activity. Some studies found correlations with temperature, light, and atmospheric pressure, while others reported no seasonal variation. Conclusions: RD seasonality reflects a complex interplay of environmental and behavioural factors. Future research should focus on standardised methodologies to clarify these relationships and inform preventative strategies.

Neurotrophic keratopathy or keratitis (NK) is a degenerative corneal disorder characterised by reduced corneal sensitivity and impaired epithelial repair, most often associated with trigeminal nerve dysfunction. Topical insulin eye drops have been proposed as a potential adjunctive therapy, but wider clinical adoption is constrained by variability in preparation methods, inconsistent dosing approaches, and the absence of consensus guidance or regulatory approval. Current clinical experience suggests that topical insulin may be well tolerated and could offer therapeutic value in selected NK settings, including difficult-to-manage cases. Nonetheless, the overall evidence base remains limited and heterogeneous, making it challenging to define optimal regimens or confidently position topical insulin within existing treatment pathways. This review includes clinical studies and case reports and highlights the role of TI as a promising, cost-effective and well-tolerated treatment option for neurotrophic keratopathy, especially in refractory cases. This work also illustrates the need for further research to standardise formulation and dosing, establish practical clinical guidance, and clarify the patient populations and disease stages most likely to benefit, as well as the role of topical insulin alongside established interventions.