Bulent Mertoglu

Dr. Bulent Mertoglu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 October 2012 in Biodegradation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADeniz Akgul
Deniz Akgul
CACigdem Kalkan Aktan
Cigdem Kalkan Aktan
KYKozet Yapsakli
Kozet Yapsakli
BMBulent Mertoglu
Bulent Mertoglu

1 December 2008 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBulent Mertoglu
Bulent Mertoglu
NSNeslihan Semerci
Neslihan Semerci
NGNuray Guler
Nuray Guler
BCBaris Calli
Baris Calli
FCFerhan Cecen
Ferhan Cecen
ASAhmet Mete Saatci
Ahmet Mete Saatci

10 November 2011 in Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HOHuseyin Ozdemir
Huseyin Ozdemir
BMBulent Mertoglu
Bulent Mertoglu
GDGoksel Demir
Goksel Demir
ADAli Deniz
Ali Deniz
HTHüseyin TOROS
Hüseyin TOROS

17 July 2024 in Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTugba Sari
Tugba Sari
DADeniz Akgul
Deniz Akgul
BMBulent Mertoglu
Bulent Mertoglu

9 December 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSüleyman Enes Hacıbektaşoğlu
Süleyman Enes Hacıbektaşoğlu
BMBulent Mertoglu
Bulent Mertoglu
Hakan TozanHakan Tozan
Hakan Tozan
Occupational health and safety (OHS) activities aim to ensure the full mental and physical well-being of employees in the workplace. For this reason, it is essential to determine the precautions to be taken and the suitability of risk assessments. In this study, f-SC, a novel hybrid risk analysis method using Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) based on fuzzy logic, was developed to perform a classical Fine–Kinney risk analysis method. There are few studies in the literature about the Fine–Kinney method compared to other risk analysis methods such as FMEA and FTA. Therefore, this work aimed to integrate this classical method with the proposed method to obtain more accurate and sensitive results in risk analyses. First, the criteria used in determining the risk score were weighted with the help of 10 OHS experts. As the criteria used in the classical method are evaluated with equal importance, this situation can cause serious errors in the risk scores obtained with the relevant calculations and in the risk priorities based on these calculations. We aimed to minimize the occurrence of such errors by determining the weights of the criteria with the proposed method. f-SWARA was used for this process. The weights of probability, exposure, and severity criteria were obtained as 0.196, 0.285, and 0.518, respectively. Thus, it was determined that severity is an important and effective criterion for calculating the risk score. In the proposed method, after the criterion weights were determined, an analysis of the hazards was conducted with the f-COPRAS method instead of the classical Fine–Kinney method. Contrary to the numerical values used in the classical method, in this method, decision makers use linguistic terms that are more intuitive than numerical values. These linguistic terms were converted into numerical values using this method based on fuzzy logic, and a ranking of hazards was obtained. As a result of the analyses, it was seen that the case study, H7, which had a 0.557 Ni value, was the most dangerous scenario and that H11, which had a 1.000 Ni value, was the least dangerous. In addition, for the same data, analyses were conducted using the fuzzy Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method, which has been previously used in the literature, and a comparison was made with the f-SC method to demonstrate the validity of the study. The results of the f-VIKOR and classical Fine–Kinney methods were similar to the developed f-SC method. This research provides three contributions: (1) criteria must be weighted to determine risk scores, (2) using intuitive linguistic terms in scoring criteria made the risk analysis method more sensitive and appropriate, and (3) using MCDM methods instead of classical methods for the risk analyses in the OHS field removes uncertainties.

6 March 2008 in Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBulent Mertoglu
Bulent Mertoglu
In this study, long term nitrification performances and microbial composition in a full-scale oxidation ditch type wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) were monitored and evaluated using different molecular methods; fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), slot-blot hybridization and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. In situ and membrane hybridization results indicated that Nitrosomonas species were identified as the dominant ammonia oxidizing bacteria and Nitrospira related species were detected as the prevailing nitrite oxidizing bacteria in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant throughout 2 years of operation. Real-time PCR using the LightCyclerinstrument has been developed for the quantification of ammonia monooxygenase (amoA) and 16S rRNA genes. Results suggest that real-time PCR analysis, amoA/16S rRNA ratio, is an alternative method to understand nitrifying bacterial population and activity in wastewater treatment plant compared with the FISH and slot-blot hybridization assays. The autotrophic/heterotrophic bacterial ratio and their influence on reactor performances were investigated using real-time PCR amoA/16S rRNA gene copy ratios and the results showed that this ratio varied from 3.6% to 8.3% during operational period.