Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in critically ill COVID-19 patients. There is currently no generally recognized method of assessing gastrointestinal injury in unconscious or sedated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. I-FABP (intestinal fatty acid binding protein) and citrulline have previously been studied as potential biomarkers of enterocyte damage in various gastrointestinal tract diseases, and changes in the levels of these markers may reflect intestinal wall damage in COVID-19. Patients with critical COVID-19, with diagnosed sepsis, or septic shock requiring ICU treatment were included in the study. Blood samples for citrulline and I-FABP were taken daily from day 1 to 5. I-FABP levels were significantly higher in patients who eventually died from COVID-19 than in survivors, and the optimal I-FABP cut-off point for predicting 28-day mortality was 668.57 pg/mL (sensitivity 0.739, specificity 0.765). Plasma levels of I-FABP, but not citrulline, were associated with significantly higher mortality and appeared to be a predictor of poor outcome in multivariate logistic regression analysis. In conclusion, I-FABP seems to be an effective prognostic marker in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Assessing mortality risk based on intestinal markers may be helpful in making clinical decisions regarding the management of intestinal injury, imaging diagnostics, and potential surgical interventions.

Background: CD163, a cell membrane surface molecule specifically expressed by macrophages with an anti-inflammatory phenotype, participates in innate immunity. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical utility of sCD163 in septic patients in comparison to other parameters associated with infections, mainly PCT, CRP and IL-18. Methods: Serum samples were obtained from 40 septic patients on the ICU admission day, 3rd and 5th study days. The control group consisted of 30 healthy volunteers from whom the specimen was collected once. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the concentrations of sCD163 and IL-18. CRP and PCT records, among others, were provided by the hospital. Results: Septic shock was associated with the highest concentrations of sCD163 and IL-18. Admission values of sCD163 significantly contributed to mortality prediction in septic patients. Conclusions: The concentration of sCD163 determined on the ICU admission day may potentially be utilized in estimation of the odds of death among septic patients.

The aim of this prospective, observational study was to assess whether changes in the level of endocan, a marker of endothelial damage, may be an indicator of clinical deterioration and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Endocan and clinical parameters were evaluated in 40 patients with acute respiratory failure on days 1–5 after admission to the intensive care unit. Endocan levels were not related to the degree of respiratory failure, but to the presence of cardiovascular failure. In patients with cardiovascular failure, the level of endocan increased over the first 5 days (1.63, 2.50, 2.68, 2.77, 3.31 ng/mL, p = 0.016), while in patients without failure it decreased (1.51, 1.50, 1.56, 1.42, 1.13 ng/mL, p = 0.046). In addition, mortality was more than twice as high in patients with acute cardiovascular failure compared to those without failure (68% vs. 32%, p = 0.035). Baseline endocan levels were lower in viral than in bacterial infections (1.57 ng/mL vs. 5.25 ng/mL, p < 0.001), with a good discrimination between infections of different etiologies (AUC of 0.914, p < 0.001). In conclusion, endocan levels are associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular failure in COVID-19 and depend on the etiology of the infection, with higher values for bacterial than for viral sepsis.

Background: This study compares organ dysfunction, treatment strategies, and unfavorable outcome rates between pregnant and nonpregnant women admitted to the ICU with severe COVID-19, highlighting the increased susceptibility of pregnant women to respiratory infections due to physiological changes. Methods: A retrospective, age-matched study was conducted at a referral center specializing in critical care for pregnant women. Data from 14 pregnant/postpartum and 11 nonpregnant women were analyzed at ICU admission and on days 3, 5, and 7. Results: Acute respiratory distress syndrome was diagnosed in 100% of the pregnant/postpartum group and 64% of the nonpregnant group (p = 0.026). Inflammatory parameters were similar between groups, except for lower ferritin levels in the pregnant/postpartum group compared to the nonpregnant (120 vs. 568 µg/L at admission and 90 vs. 616 µg/L on day 3). Creatinine, lactate, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were significantly lower in the pregnant/postpartum group. A reduction in the SOFA score was observed over time in the pregnant/postpartum group (from 7.0 to 4.0 points, p = 0.009), while no change was noticed in the nonpregnant group (from 3.0 to 2.5 points, p = 0.181). Unfavorable outcome rates were similar, with two patients from each group succumbing to the disease (p = 0.604). Conclusions: The findings suggest that pregnancy does not increase the risk of unfavorable outcomes among women with severe COVID-19 receiving ICU treatment. However, additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these observations.