Background: An antidiabetic medication regimen is crucial for maintaining glycemic control. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cognitive dysfunction have a bidirectional relationship. This study aims to explore the impact that adjusting antidiabetic medication regimens has on medication adherence, glycemic control, and cognitive function in patients with T2DM and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional analysis that includes 364 consecutive inpatients with T2DM. Clinical data were collected, medication adherence was assessed using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), and cognitive status was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE). These data were obtained both during hospitalization and at a three-month follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the association between changes in medication regimens and medication adherence, glycemic control, and cognitive function. Results: Baseline medication adherence was high across all three different cognitive status groups, with no significant difference in MARS-5 scores. At the 3-month follow-up, the group with a high adjustment ratio of antidiabetic medication regimens showed an increase in their hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level compared to the baseline, while the group with a low adjustment ratio showed a decrease in this level. In addition, the MoCA, MMSE, and MARS-5 scores of the high-adjustment group were significantly lower than those of the low-adjustment group. Conclusions: A high ratio of medication adjustment was significantly associated with worse medication adherence and glycemic control in T2DM patients with MCI. Patients with a low ratio of medication adjustment had good adherence and better glycemic control. Clinicians should take cognitive status into account when adjusting antidiabetic regimens for T2DM patients and may need to provide additional guidance to patients with cognitive impairment to improve adherence and glycemic outcomes.

Background: Evidence supports the effectiveness and safety of open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) in patients with type 1 diabetes. However, evidence regarding the clinical application of open-source AID in perioperative patients with type 2 diabetes remains limited. Methods: This was an open-label, single-center, exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with parallel groups. Patients with diabetes (excluding type 1 diabetes mellitus) scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to the closed-loop group (open-source hybrid closed-loop AID system) or the control group (conventional insulin pump). The primary outcome was the percentage of time in the target glucose range (TIR, 3.9–10.0 mmol/L). Other efficacy and safety outcomes were also compared between the groups. Results: A total of 49 participants were included and randomized to the closed-loop group (n = 25) or the control group (n = 24). Participants underwent abdominal, orthopedic, thoracic surgery, or neurosurgery during hospitalization. Patients in the closed-loop group had significantly higher TIR than patients in the control group (76.4 ± 14.1% vs. 61.2 ± 20.0%, p = 0.005). Compared with the control group, the closed-loop group also exhibited a 15.6 percentage point reduction in time above range (TAR, >10 mmol/L) without increasing time below range (TBR, <3.9 mmol/L). There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia (<2.2 mmol/L) or diabetic ketoacidosis in either group. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that in patients with diabetes undergoing elective surgery, the open-source hybrid closed-loop AID system provides better glycemic control than conventional insulin pump therapy.