Ranajit Bandyopadhyay

Dr. Ranajit Bandyopadhyay

Principal Scientist
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 November 2016 in World Mycotoxin Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ranajit BandyopadhyayRanajit Bandyopadhyay
Ranajit Bandyopadhyay
AOAlejandro Ortega-Beltran
Alejandro Ortega-Beltran
AAA. Akande
A. Akande
CMC. Mutegi
C. Mutegi
JAJ. Atehnkeng
J. Atehnkeng
Peter CottyPeter Cotty
Peter Cotty
Aflatoxin contamination of crops is frequent in warm regions across the globe, including large areas in sub-Saharan Africa. Crop contamination with these dangerous toxins transcends health, food security, and trade sectors. It cuts across the value chain, affecting farmers, traders, markets, and finally consumers. Diverse fungi withinAspergillus sectionFlavi contaminate crops with aflatoxins. Within theseAspergillus communities, several genotypes are not capable of producing aflatoxins (atoxigenic). Carefully selected atoxigenic genotypes in biological control (biocontrol) formulations efficiently reduce aflatoxin contamination of crops when applied prior to flowering in the field. This safe and environmentally friendly, effective technology was pioneered in the US, where well over a million acres of susceptible crops are treated annually. The technology has been improved for use in sub-Saharan Africa, where efforts are under way to develop biocontrol products, under the trade name Aflasafe, for 11 African nations. The number of participating nations is expected to increase. In parallel, state of the art technology has been developed for large-scale inexpensive manufacture of Aflasafe products under the conditions present in many African nations. Results to date indicate that all Aflasafe products, registered and under experimental use, reduce aflatoxin concentrations in treated crops by >80% in comparison to untreated crops in both field and storage conditions. Benefits of aflatoxin biocontrol technologies are discussed along with potential challenges, including climate change, likely to be faced during the scaling-up of Aflasafe products. Lastly, we respond to several apprehensions expressed in the literature about the use of atoxigenic genotypes in biocontrol formulations. These responses relate to the following apprehensions: sorghum as carrier, distribution costs, aflatoxin-conscious markets, efficacy during drought, post-harvest benefits, risk of allergies and/or aspergillosis, influence of Aflasafe on other mycotoxins and on soil microenvironment, dynamics ofAspergillus genotypes, and recombination between atoxigenic and toxigenic genotypes in natural conditions.

1 May 2009 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LTLeena Tripathi
Leena Tripathi
MMMaina Mwangi
Maina Mwangi
SASteffen Abele
Steffen Abele
VAValentine Aritua
Valentine Aritua
WTWilberforce Kateera Tushemereirwe
Wilberforce Kateera Tushemereirwe
Ranajit BandyopadhyayRanajit Bandyopadhyay
Ranajit Bandyopadhyay

26 September 2008 in Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJ. Atehnkeng
J. Atehnkeng
POP.S. Ojiambo
P.S. Ojiambo
TIT. Ikotun
T. Ikotun
RSR.A. Sikora
R.A. Sikora
Peter CottyPeter Cotty
Peter Cotty
Ranajit BandyopadhyayRanajit Bandyopadhyay
Ranajit Bandyopadhyay
Aflatoxin contamination resulting from maize infection by Aspergillus flavus is both an economic and a public health concern. Therefore, strategies for controlling aflatoxin contamination in maize are being investigated. The abilities of eleven naturally occurring atoxigenic isolates in Nigeria to reduce aflatoxin contamination in maize were evaluated in grain competition experiments and in field studies during the 2005 and 2006 growing seasons. Treatments consisted of inoculation of either grains in vials or ears at mid-silking stage in field plots, with the toxigenic isolate (La3228) or atoxigenic isolate alone and co-inoculation of each atoxigenic isolate and La3328. Aflatoxin B1 + B2 concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the co-inoculation treatments compared with the treatment in which the aflatoxin-producing isolate La3228 was inoculated alone. Relative levels of aflatoxin B1 + B2 reduction ranged from 70.1% to 99.9%. Among the atoxigenics, two isolates from Lafia, La3279 and La3303, were most effective at reducing aflatoxin B1 + B2 concentrations in both laboratory and field trials. These two isolates have potential value as agents for the biocontrol of aflatoxin contamination in maize. Because these isolates are endemic to West Africa, they are both more likely than introduced isolates to be well adapted to West African environments and to meet regulatory concerns over their use throughout that region.

1 April 1998 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ranajit BandyopadhyayRanajit Bandyopadhyay
Ranajit Bandyopadhyay
DFDebra E. Frederickson
Debra E. Frederickson
NMNeal W. McLaren
Neal W. McLaren
GOGary N. Odvody
Gary N. Odvody
MRMalcolm J. Ryley
Malcolm J. Ryley

24 September 2007 in Food Additives & Contaminants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ranajit BandyopadhyayRanajit Bandyopadhyay
Ranajit Bandyopadhyay
MKManjula Kumar
Manjula Kumar
John LeslieJohn Leslie
John Leslie
Aflatoxins are a common contaminant of cereals that can cause cancer, liver disease, immune suppression, retarded growth and development, and death, depending on the level and duration of exposure. Maize is an introduced crop to Africa and there have been efforts over the last 20 years or so to replace traditional cereal crops, such as sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), with maize. We found that maize was significantly more heavily colonized by aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus spp. than either sorghum or millet, with overall aflatoxin levels being correspondingly higher. On average, Nigerians consume 138 kg cereals annually. If the primary cereal is sorghum instead of maize, then the risk of aflatoxin-related problems is reduced 4-fold; if it is pearl millet, then the risks are reduced 8-fold. Development programs and other ventures to increase maize production in marginal cropping areas of Africa should be reconsidered and, instead, efforts to improve/maintain traditional crops encouraged.

1 April 2020 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juan MoralJuan Moral
Juan Moral
MLMARÍA TERESA GARCÍA LOPEZ
MARÍA TERESA GARCÍA LOPEZ
Boris CamilettiBoris Camiletti
Boris Camiletti
RJRamon Jaime
Ramon Jaime
TMThemis J. Michailides
Themis J. Michailides
AOAlejandro Ortega-Beltran
Alejandro Ortega-Beltran
Aflatoxin contamination of important food and feed crops occurs frequently in warm tropical and subtropical regions. The contamination is caused mainly by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus. Aflatoxin contamination negatively affects health and trade sectors and causes economic losses to agricultural industries. Many pre- and post-harvest technologies can limit aflatoxin contamination but may not always reduce aflatoxin concentrations below tolerance thresholds. However, the use of atoxigenic (non-toxin producing) isolates of A. flavus to competitively displace aflatoxin producers is a practical strategy that effectively limits aflatoxin contamination in crops from field to plate. Biocontrol products formulated with atoxigenic isolates as active ingredients have been registered for use in the US, several African nations, and one such product is in final stages of registration in Italy. Many other nations are seeking to develop biocontrol products to protect their crops. In this review article we present an overview of the biocontrol technology, explain the basis to select atoxigenic isolates as active ingredients, describe how formulations are developed and tested, and describe how a biocontrol product is used commercially. Future perspectives on formulations of aflatoxin biocontrol products, along with other important topics related to the aflatoxin biocontrol technology are also discussed.