Summary: Background: Current diagnostic guidelines recommend that eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) should be diagnosed only after GERD is excluded by a lack of response to a trial of acid suppression. There is limited information available providing outcome data about the effectiveness of this approach.Aim: To examine the impact of double‐dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on symptoms, endoscopic and histological features in patients with documented oesophageal eosinophilia consistent with EoE (≥15 eosinophils/high‐power field).Methods: Sixty consecutive symptomatic patients with documented oesophageal eosinophilia received open‐label omeprazole 20 mg orally twice daily before meals for 8 weeks. Clinical, endoscopic and histological (resolution: 0–5 eosinophils/HPF, partial improvement: 5–14 eosinophils/HPF), or no improvement: (≥15 eosinophils/HPF) evaluation was repeated at the end of this period. An expert GI pathologist, unaware of the study aims, reviewed all slides.Results: Clinical improvement occurred in 43 (71.6%), endoscopic signs were reduced in 34 (61.8%) and normalised in 12 (21.8%), and histologically, 34 (56.6%) improved, while 15 (25%) obtained complete resolution. Overall, 22 patients (36.7%) obtained both complete clinical and histological remission.Conclusions: More than 50% of patients with documented oesophageal eosinophilic infiltration in the EoE range improved when treated with a double‐dose PPI trial for 8 weeks. These findings support the published guidelines recommending a PPI trial prior to diagnosing EoE, and confirm the existence of an eosinophilic oesophageal infiltrationPPI‐responsive population.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by recurrent abdominal pain, bloating, and changes in bowel habit. To determine the clinical effectiveness of the antispasmodic agents available in Mexico for the treatment of IBS. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials on antispasmodic agents for IBS treatment. Clinical trials identified from January 1960 to May 2011 were searched for in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Treatment response was evaluated by global improvement of symptoms or abdominal pain, abdominal distention/bloating, and frequency of adverse events. The effect of antispasmodics vs placebo was expressed in OR and 95% CI. Twenty-seven studies were identified, 23 of which fulfilled inclusion criteria. The studied agents were pinaverium bromide, mebeverine, otilonium, trimebutine, alverine, hyoscine, alverine/simethicone, pinaverium/simethicone, fenoverine, and dicyclomine. A total of 2585 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Global improvement was 1.55 (CI 95%: 1.33 to 1.83). Otilonium and the alverine/simethicone combination produced significant values in global improvement while the pinaverium/simethicone combination showed improvement in bloating. As for pain, 2394 patients were included with an OR of 1.52 (IC 95%: 1.28 a 1.80), favoring antispasmodics. Antispasmodics were more effective than placebo in IBS, without any significant adverse events. The addition of simethicone improved the properties of the antispasmodic agents, as seen with the alverine/simethicone and pinaverium/simethicone combinations.

To define the prevalence and clinical characteristics of glucose metabolism disorders (GMD) in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis (LC). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were measured to 130 patients with clinically stable LC. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) and fasting plasma insulin determinations were performed to patients with normal FPG. Insulin resistance (IR) was calculated with HOMA2-IR index. GMD were classified according to FPG and OGTT tests results and to the chronologic relation between diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) and LC as follows: type-2 DM (T2DM), hepatogenous diabetes (HD) and impaired glucose tolerance. Patients from all groups were compared. The prevalence of GMD were as follows: T2DM in 25 patients (19.2%, 95% CI 12.5-25.9), HD in 28 (21.5%, 95% CI 14.5-28.5) and IGT in 36 (38.5%, 95% CI 30.1-46.7). The total of patients with GMD was 79.2% (95% CI 72.3-86.1). In 41% of cases GMD were subclinical and 48.7% of patients had IR. Patients with T2DM had a higher number of variables with significant differences compared with the other groups (more marked compared to the patients without GMD). The only differences between the patients with T2DM and HD were hypercreatininemia: 1.14 ± 0.53 vs. 0.84 ± 0.22 mg/dL (p = 0.005) and family history of DM: 8 (32%) vs. 2 (7%) (p = 0.02). Almost 80% of patients with compensated LC had GMD. Half of them were subclinical. The patients with T2DM had marked clinical differences compared to patients from the other groups, particularly renal impairment.

Clinical and endoscopic features of cirrhotic patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) have been rarely reported and clinical outcomes and predictors of mortality have not been evaluated. 1) To describe the clinical features; 2) To define the clinical outcomes; and 3) To identify the predictors of in-hospital mortality of cirrhotic patients with NVUGIB. One hundred sixty cirrhotic patients with NVUGIB were prospectively studied. Clinical features, endoscopic findings, clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality rate were studied. Predictors of death were identified by means of univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. The mean age was 56.5 ± 14.4, male gender prevailed. Alcohol was the most frequent etiology. Hemodynamic instability was reported in 29.4%. Mean serum hemoglobin was 9.5 ± 3.3 g/dL and blood transfusions were required in 59.4%. Gastroduodenal ulcers were the most frequent source of bleeding (50.6%). In endoscopy "high-risk" bleeding stigmata (HRBS) at the ulcer base were found in 53.1%. All patients with HRBS received endoscopic treatment. Rebleeding occurred in 3 patients (1.9%) and mortality was of 13.8%. By univariate analysis: Cryptogenic etiology, BUN, hypoalbuminemia, active bleeding at ulcer base, and endoscopic treatment were predictors of mortality. However, only cryptogenic etiology, hypoalbuminemia and active bleeding at ulcer base were independent predictors of death in multivariate analysis. Gastroduodenal ulcers as a source of NVUGIB are frequent in cirrhotic patients. They were severe; half of them had HRBS, and required frequently endoscopic treatment. In-hospital mortality of these patients seemed to be greater than that of non-cirrhotic patients, and it was significantly related to cryptogenic etiology of cirrhosis, renal dysfunction, severe hepatic failure, and active bleeding ulcers on admission to the hospital.

Background. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) has implications for health-related quality of life as well as for survival of cirrhotic patients, but a standardized diagnostic test is not available. Objective. To determine the prevalence of MHE among cirrhotic patients by using the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) system and the critical flicker frequency (CFF) test to diagnose MHE and to identify factors that influence the results of these tests. Material and methods. From April 2007 to March 2008, PHES and CFF tests were performed on patients with cirrhosis but no overt hepatic encephalopathy. Descriptive statistics were used to express the results and the Spearman correlation was used to evaluate CFF and PHES results according to age and education level. Results. We studied 104 patients. The prevalence of MHE was 55.8% (n = 58) based on a positive result for either the PHES or the CFF test, 32.7% (n = 34) based on positive PHES results alone, 34.6% (n = 36) based on positive CFF test results alone and 11.5% (n = 12) based on a positive result for both tests. According to PHES, the incidence of MHE was correlated with education level (r = 0.333, p = 0.001), but not with age. According to CFF, the incidence of MHE was correlated with age (r = -0.93, p = 0.049), but not with education level. Conclusion. The prevalence of MHE was similar to that previously reported. Patient literacy influences MHE diagnosis with PHES but not with CFF. CFF is a simple and feasible method that identifies patients with MHE who may benefit from treatment independently of their education level.