Katherine Lacasse

Dr. Katherine Lacasse

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 February 2022 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FMFrances C. Moore
Frances C. Moore
KLKatherine Lacasse
Katherine Lacasse
KMKatharine J. Mach
Katharine J. Mach
YSYoon Ah Shin
Yoon Ah Shin
LGLouis J. Gross
Louis J. Gross
BBBrian Beckage
Brian Beckage

1 January 2018 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBBrian Beckage
Brian Beckage
LGLouis J. Gross
Louis J. Gross
KLKatherine Lacasse
Katherine Lacasse
ECEric Carr
Eric Carr
SMSara S. Metcalf
Sara S. Metcalf
Forrest M. HoffmanForrest M. Hoffman
Forrest M. Hoffman


16 November 2022 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBBrian Beckage
Brian Beckage
FMFrances C. Moore
Frances C. Moore
KLKatherine Lacasse
Katherine Lacasse

17 December 2013 in Emotion Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJames D. Laird
James D. Laird
KLKatherine Lacasse
Katherine Lacasse
William James’s theory of emotion has been controversial since its inception, and a basic analysis of Cannon’s critique is provided. Research on the impact of facial expressions, expressive behaviors, and visceral responses on emotional feelings are each reviewed. A good deal of evidence supports James’s theory that these types of bodily feedback, along with perceptions of situational cues, are each important parts of emotional feelings. Extensions to James’s theory are also reviewed, including evidence of individual differences in the effect of bodily responses on emotional experience.

19 December 2017 in Environment and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KLKatherine Lacasse
Katherine Lacasse
This field experiment investigated whether purposefully adopting a new pro-environmental behavior (e.g., unplugging appliances, reusing shopping bags) led to positive spillover by altering people’s subsequent pro-environmental behaviors and political attitudes. Participants (N = 125) recruited through community organizations were randomly assigned to either adopt a new pro-environmental behavior of their choice for three weeks, or were not invited to do so. Behavior adoption increased participants’ likelihood of contacting their senator about climate change, but had little direct spillover effect on other individual pro-environmental behaviors, their likelihood of making household-wide changes, the political importance they placed on climate-related issues, or their support for emissions-reducing policies. Behavior adoption increased sense of environmental responsibility among some participants, leading to indirect positive effects on purchasing organic/local produce and policy support. Overall, observed positive spillover effects were limited and relatively small. There was little indication that behavior adoption led to any meaningful negative spillover effects.