Understanding the methane (CH₄) emissions that are produced by enteric fermentation is one of the main problems to be solved for livestock, due to their GHG effects. These emissions are affected by the quantity and quality of their diets, thus, it is key to accurately define the intake and fiber content (NDF) of these forage diets. On the other hand, different emission prediction equations have been developed; however, there are scarce and uncertain results regarding their evaluation of the emissions that have been observed in forage diets. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of the NDF content of a forage diet on CH₄ enteric emissions, and to evaluate the ability of models to predict the emissions from the animals that are consuming these forage diets. In total, thirty-six Angus steers ($\overline{x}$ = 437 kg live weight) aged 18 months, blocked by live weight and placed in three automated feeding pens, were used to measure the enteric CH₄. The animals were randomly assigned to two forage diets (n = 18), with moderate (50%, HF) NDF contents. Their dry matter intake was recorded individually, and the CH₄ emissions were measured using the SF₆ tracer gas technique. For the model evaluation, six prediction equations were compared with 29 studies (n = 97 observations), analyzing the accuracy and precision of their estimates. The emission intensities per unit of DMI, per ADG, and per gross energy intake were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the animals consuming the MF diet than in the animals consuming the HF diet (21.7 vs. 23.7 g CH₄/kg DMI, 342 vs. 660 g CH₄/kg ADG, and 6.7% vs. 7.5%, respectively), but there were no differences in the absolute emissions (p > 0.05). The best performing model was the IPCC 2006 model (r² = 0.7, RMSE = 74.04). These results show that reducing the NDF content of a forage diet by at least 10% (52 g/kg DM) reduces the intensity of the g CH₄/kg DMI by up to 8%, and that of the g CH₄/kg ADG by almost half. The use of the IPCC 2006 model is suitable for estimating the CH₄ emissions from animals consuming forage-based diets.

Extensive cattle production on native grasslands is vital to the sustainability of the South American Pampas, and the inclusion of tannin-containing legumes can increase farm profitability, improve nitrogen (N) use and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study quantified the effects of adding tannin-containing legumes to native grasslands on enteric methane (CH₄) emissions, animal performance and N balance in cattle. A crossover design trial was conducted with 22 beef heifers under two treatments: native grassland (NG) and native grassland with the addition of Lotus uliginosus and L. angustissimus (NG+L). The results showed that forage mass disappearance was similar between treatments; however, 54% of the forage disappearance in the NG+L corresponded with legumes, indicating that the heifers in this treatment consumed a better-quality diet. While individual CH₄ emissions were similar between treatments, heifers grazing the NG+L showed a higher average daily gain (ADG) and lower emissions intensity than heifers grazing NGs (0.25 vs. 0.58 g CH₄/g ADG, p < 0.05). Additionally, they also ingested 20% more N and were more efficient in its utilization. Incorporating tannin-containing legumes into native grasslands can improve animal productivity and N use efficiency while reducing the intensity of enteric CH₄ emissions.

Native forests embedded in pastoral landscapes can support production, biodiversity and rural livelihoods, but their potential as nature-based solutions depends on how farmers perceive, use and manage them. In Uruguay, extensive cattle and mixed cattle-sheep systems rely on native grasslands, while patches of native forest occur within the same farms and are routinely accessed by livestock. Despite this close relationship, farmers' perceptions of native forest remain poorly documented. This study assessed how livestock farmers perceive, value and manage native forests, based on telephone surveys with 95 farmers stratified by region and farm size. The survey addressed definitions of native forest, perceived ecosystem services, management practices, livestock access, and awareness/use of regulatory and fiscal instruments, and examined associations between farmer/farm characteristics (region, farm size, tenure, age, gender) and management decisions. Most farmers (96%) valued native forest mainly for the shade and shelter it provides livestock, and 42% considered it beneficial to the productive system. Although over 65% were unwilling to expand forest area, 47% wanted to improve its quality through thinning, natural regeneration or management planning. Farm scale was associated with awareness and use of governance instruments, whereas willingness to expand or improve native-forest management was generally limited across the sample. Awareness of the tax-exemption and native-forest-management-permit instruments was moderate (50–54%) but uptake remained low (20–21%). These findings support conserving and improving existing forest as a locally grounded nature-based solution, prioritizing functionality and lower barriers to incentive uptake.