Patrick Roden-Reynolds

Mr. Patrick Roden-Reynolds

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 September 2022 in Urban Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPatrick Roden-Reynolds
Patrick Roden-Reynolds
CKC. M. Kent
C. M. Kent
Andrew LiAndrew Li
Andrew Li
JMJennifer Murrow Mullinax
Jennifer Murrow Mullinax
Understanding the ecology of the often dense white-tailed deer populations in urban and suburban landscapes is important for mitigating a variety of conflicts that arise with dense human populations, such as issues surrounding zoonotic disease mitigation. We collared white-tailed deer in highly suburban areas of Howard County, Maryland with high-resolution GPS collars. Then, we created autocorrelated kernel density home ranges for broader land use analyses and concurrently used general additive models to characterize fine-scale hourly measures of speed, activity, and proximity to residential buildings. Suburban deer home ranges encompassed approximately 35% direct residential land, and an average of 71 and 129 residential properties were found within female and male core ranges, respectively. Sex, time of day, and day of year all influenced fine-scale speeds, activity levels, and proximity to residential property buildings. Deer moved into residential areas nightly, especially in winter, and exhibited bouts of increased speed and activity shortly after sunrise and sunset, with distinctive seasonal changes. We discuss how variation in home ranges and movements may influence population management success and explore year-round periods of increased risk of deer transporting ticks to residential areas. These findings focus our broad understanding of deer movements in suburban and urban landscapes to improve deer population management and to mitigate the spread of ticks into residential areas.

17 September 2024 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RJRichard Johnson
Richard Johnson
PRPatrick Roden-Reynolds
Patrick Roden-Reynolds
ASAllison Snow
Allison Snow
SRStephen M. Rich
Stephen M. Rich
In the northeastern USA, the distribution of lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum) has expanded northward in recent decades, overlapping with the range of blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis). Blacklegged ticks carry pathogens for diseases such as Lyme, babesiosis, and anaplasmosis, while bites from lone star ticks cause other diseases and the alpha-gal syndrome allergy. Lone star ticks can become so abundant that they are perceived as more of a public health threat than blacklegged ticks. Using the island of Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, as a case study, we analyzed data from a total of 1265 yard surveys from 2011 to 2024 to document lone star tick presence and subsequent expansion from two peripheral areas, Chappaquiddick and Aquinnah, to all six towns. The timing of lone star tick expansion on Martha’s Vineyard closely matched an increase in tick submissions to a pathogen testing center. At Chappaquiddick, drag sampling carried out in June 2023 and 2024 showed that both tick species were most common at wooded sites, where blacklegged nymphs were somewhat more abundant than lone star nymphs. However, lone star ticks occurred in a wider range of natural and peridomestic habitats than blacklegged nymphs, making them far more challenging for people to avoid and manage.

8 January 2025 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HGHeidi Goethert
Heidi Goethert
AOAlanna O’cAllahan
Alanna O’cAllahan
RJRichard Johnson
Richard Johnson
PRPatrick Roden-Reynolds
Patrick Roden-Reynolds
STSam Telford
Sam Telford
: In the northeast United States, subadult deer ticks feeding on white-footed mice are thought to drive the force of transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi (B. burgdorferi), the agent of Lyme disease. However, control measures targeting mice have produced inconsistent results, suggesting that other animals are significant contributors to enzootic transmission. Such contributions have previously been difficult to quantify. We used a retrotransposon-based host blood meal assay to measure the relative contribution of hosts to enzootic B. burgdorferi transmission at two insular sites in Massachusetts. Over 6 years, we identified mice and deer as the most common larval hosts at our Nantucket Island site. Infected nymphal ticks were derived mainly from mice (35%) and shrews (31%), despite shrews having fed only 12% of larvae. Deer were identified in 19% of the infected nymphs, despite their known reservoir incompetence. Shrews were consistently the most important host in our Martha’s Vineyard site and were identified as the source of 41% of nymphs overall and 39% of the infected nymphs. Sciurids were variable contributors, feeding from 4% to 42% of the larval ticks each year, and contributed no infected nymphs in 2020 and as many as 83% in 2023. We conclude that host contributions to feeding larval ticks change over time and within sites and that shrews may be more influential than mice at some sites. Shrews, sciurids, and even deer may contribute to B. burgdorferi maintenance. Hosts that apparently feed a minor proportion of ticks can have a major impact on the force of B. burgdorferi transmission.

4 January 2025 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPatrick Pearson
Patrick Pearson
GXGuang Xu
Guang Xu
ESEric L Siegel
Eric L Siegel
MRMileena Rose Ryan
Mileena Rose Ryan
CRConnor M Rich
Connor M Rich
SRStephen M. Rich
Stephen M. Rich
Deer keds (Lipoptena spp. and Neolipoptena ferrisi) are hematophagous ectoparasites that primarily infest white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and other cervids in the United States. The distribution of deer keds in the northeastern United States and the pathogens they harbor remains relatively unexplored. In this study, we examined the geographical distribution and pathogen prevalence of deer keds in Massachusetts by collecting samples from white-tailed deer and testing for tick-borne pathogens. Deer keds were collected across the state, including in four previously unrecorded counties, indicating a wide distribution. Pathogen screening revealed the presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA in 30% of the keds, but no other pathogens were detected. The medical and biological significance of detecting A. phagocytophilum DNA in deer keds requires future studies. This research provides a baseline for the distribution and pathogen prevalence of deer keds in Massachusetts and highlights the potential of deer keds as sentinels for monitoring deer-associated microbes.