Ashraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat

Prof. Ashraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 September 2024 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMajeb Abdulrahman AlOtaibi
Majeb Abdulrahman AlOtaibi
ARAshraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat
Ashraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat
FMFaris M. Munshi
Faris M. Munshi
MAMohamed Ali Elsaid Ahmed
Mohamed Ali Elsaid Ahmed
SESaber Abdelaziz El-Shafai
Saber Abdelaziz El-Shafai
This study investigated the efficacy of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology in treating saline industrial wastewater, focusing on the impact of the organic loading rate (OLR) and the food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio on treatment performance. This research utilized saline industrial wastewater from Al-Hasa, which had salinity levels ranging from 5000 to 6900 mg/L. It explored treatment processes at varying Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) concentrations of 800, 1400, and 2000 mg/L, corresponding to an OLR of 0.80 ± 0.05, 1.41 ± 0.07, and 1.98 ± 0.12 g COD/L, respectively. The average F/M ratios used were 0.20, 0.36, and 0.50 g COD/g MLSS·d, maintaining a constant Sludge Residence Time (SRT) of 12 days, a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 24 h (hrs.), and a flux of 10 L/m2·h. The MBR system demonstrated high COD removal efficiencies, averaging 95.7 ± 1.6%, 95.5 ± 0.4%, and 96.1 ± 0.3%, alongside Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) removal rates of 98.3 ± 0.2%, 99.8 ± 0.1%, and 98.5 ± 0.1%, respectively. However, an increased OLR led to elevated residual COD and BOD levels in the treated effluent, with COD concentrations reaching 34.2 ± 12.8, 63.3 ± 5.9, and 76.5 ± 5.4 mg/L, respectively. This study also reveals a significant decline in ammonia and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) removal efficiencies as OLR increases, dropping from 96.1 ± 0.5% to 80.2 ± 0.9% for ammonia and from 83.8 ± 3.4% to 65.8 ± 2.3% for TKN. Furthermore, higher OLRs significantly contribute to membrane fouling and elevate the transmembrane pressure (TMP), indicating a direct correlation between OLRs and operational challenges in MBR systems. The findings suggest that for optimal performance within the Saudi disposal limits for industrial wastewater, the MBR system should operate at an F/M ratio of ≤0.33 g COD/g of Mixed Liquor Suspended Solid (MLSS)·d. This study underscores the critical role of the OLR and F/M ratio in treating saline industrial wastewater using MBR technology, providing valuable insights for enhancing treatment efficiency and compliance with environmental standards.

7 November 2025 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YAYazeed Algurainy
Yazeed Algurainy
ARAshraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat
Ashraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat
OAOmar Alrehaili
Omar Alrehaili
In arid and water-stressed regions, groundwater desalination plants are critical for ensuring reliable potable water supplies, making improvements in their operational efficiency and cost effectiveness a priority for utilities. In many such facilities, lime and soda ash softening remain common pretreatment practices, which increase chemical consumption and sludge generation, prompting the need for alternative low-chemical strategies. This study evaluates the technical, operational, and economic implications of transitioning a full-scale brackish groundwater desalination plant, from lime–soda ash softening (old plan) to a low-chemical pretreatment strategy based on antiscalant dosing (new plan) upstream of reverse osmosis (RO). Key parameters, including pH, total hardness, calcium and magnesium hardness, silica, iron, alkalinity, and total dissolved solids (TDS), were measured and compared at multiple locations within the treatment plant under both the old and new plans. Removing lime and soda ash caused higher levels of hardness, alkalinity, and silica in the water before RO treatment, increasing the risk of scaling. Operationally, the feed pressure increased from 11.43 ± 0.16 bar (old plan) to a peak of 25.50 ± 0.10 bar in the new plan, accompanied by a decline in water production. Chemical cleaning effectively restored performance, reducing feed pressure to 13.13 ± 0.05 bar, confirming that fouling and scaling were the primary, reversible causes. Despite these challenges, the plant consistently produced water that complied with Saudi Standards for Unbottled Drinking Water (e.g., pH = 7.18 ± 0.09, TDS = 978.27 ± 9.26 mg/L). Economically, the new strategy reduced operating expenditure by approximately 54% (0.295 → 0.135 $/m3), largely due to substantial reductions in chemical and sludge handling costs, although these savings were partially offset by higher energy consumption and more frequent membrane maintenance. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of systematic performance evaluation during operational transitions, providing guidance for utilities seeking to optimize pretreatment design while maintaining compliance, long-term membrane protection, and environmental sustainability.

4 November 2024 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMajeb Abdulrahman AlOtaibi
Majeb Abdulrahman AlOtaibi
ARAshraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat
Ashraf Mohamed Ibrahim Refaat
FMFaris M. Munshi
Faris M. Munshi
MAMohamed Ali Elsaid Ahmed
Mohamed Ali Elsaid Ahmed
SESaber Abdelaziz El-Shafai
Saber Abdelaziz El-Shafai
This study investigated the potential impact of salinity levels on the treatment performance and membrane fouling of MBR seeded with sludge from saline industrial effluent treatment plants. A pilot-scale MBR received mixed saline industrial effluents at an organic loading rate (OLR) of 1.3 g COD/L·d and a feed-to-micro-organism (F/M) ratio of 0.33 g COD/g TSS. The effects of the variable salt concentrations of 5, 10, 20, and 25 g/L were investigated. The ranges of ammonia and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were 22.2–26.3 mgN/L and 55.1–59.2 mgN/L, respectively. The MBR achieved promising results for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), with removal ranges of 95.4–97.2% and 98.3–98.8%, respectively. The system provides 93.2–96.7% and 81.6–92.5% for ammonia and TN removal. Up to a 20 g/L salinity level, there were no significant effects on treatment performance, but 25 g/L significantly declined daily and specific COD removal load. Despite this, residual values at 25 g/L were better and met the Saudi standard for effluent discharge. This is due to membrane fouling which declined the flux rate with a spontaneous reduction of OLR and F/M ratio. The MBR system inoculated with high-salinity-adapted sludge could be managed to release treated effluent that meets Saudi disposal limits by modifying the F/M ratio via reducing the flux or increasing the mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration.