2020 was a key year for several targets in European energy and climate policy, including the requirement for European countries to deploy smart metering for at least 80% of electricity consumers. This target was set to ease the transition towards a consumer-centered and digitalized energy system. In fact, there are numerous applications that are facilitated or are directly linked to smart meters. Among others: demand response programs that enable consumers to be active in the energy market, and remote grid monitoring by the Distribution System Operator. In this paper, we analyze the initial provisions of the Third Energy Package and those of the Clean Energy Package, with particular focus on the recently approved directive on common rules for the internal market for electricity and the newly introduced smart meters specifications. We present the highlights of the national cost–benefit analyses for smart metering roll-out, focusing on the decisions made by the Member States with respect to a potential smart meter roll-out, that was targeted to be completed by 2020 and present the current situation of smart metering roll-out. We also present and categorize some of the R&I smart grid projects realized over recent years, focusing on the ones that deal with smart metering integration in order to depict the smart metering applications and technologies tested on the ground. Therefore, this paper portrays a full picture with respect to smart meters in Europe today and gives insights for monitoring smart metering roll-outs taking into account the current trends in smart metering applications.

So far, published geochronological data poorly constrain the Late Pleistocene glacial fluctuations in the Făgăraş Mts (Southern Carpathians, Romania). The deglaciation chronology in the central Făgăraş Mts is supported by new (n = 5) and recalculated (n = 5) ¹⁰Be exposure ages from a southern and two northern valleys. Cosmic ray exposure (CRE) ages were calculated considering the effects of surface denudation, uplift and snow-shielding. A ¹⁰Be exposure age obtained from a glacial landform representing the last glacierets of the central Făgăraş Mts yielded an age of 13.3 ± 1.2 ka. A polished bedrock sample and a moraine boulder constrain the age of a cirque glacier stage to 14.5 ± 1.5 ka, while quite coherent CRE ages from two erratic boulders place the previous stage at ~18.7 ka (18.6 ± 1.7 ka and 18.7 ± 1.7 ka). These glacial stages coincide with major deglaciation stages M4 and M2a reconstructed in the Retezat Mts, derived from comparable CRE ages calculated using the same methodology; however, geomorphological and/or geochronological evidence of the intermediate stages is still not found in the central Făgăraş Mts. All CRE ages gathered from the landforms corresponding to the more extended glacial stages are younger than expected from their morphostratigraphic position and thus considered as minimum age constraints. However, considering the coherent CRE ages of the above morphostratigraphic stage, it is likely that the balanced-budget glaciological conditions corresponding to these more extended stages prevailed before ~19 ka and likely coincided with the cold peaks of the Marine Isotope Stage 2. The currently available in situ ¹⁰Be data do not support the existence of a period of glacier advance during the Holocene or Greenland Stadial-1 (Younger Dryas) in the central Făgăraş Mts.