The objective of the present review is to discuss the results of published studies that show how nutrition affects the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and how diet manipulation might change marbling and composition of fat in beef. Several key points in the synthesis of fat in cattle take place at the molecular level, and the association of nutritional factors with the modulation of this metabolism is one of the recent targets of nutrigenomic research. Within this context, special attention has been paid to the study of nuclear receptors associated with fatty acid metabolism. Among the transcription factors involved in lipid metabolism, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) stand out. The mRNA synthesis of these transcription factors is regulated by nutrients, and their metabolic action might be potentiated by diet components and change lipogenesis in muscle. Among the options for dietary manipulation with the objective to modulate lipogenesis, the use of different sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids, starch concentrations, forage ratios and vitamins stand out. Therefore, special care must be exercised in feedlot feed management, mainly when the goal is to produce high marbling beef.

This work modifies a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to detect the bovine respiratory disease (BRD) bacterial pathogens Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Histophilus somni in a colorimetric format on a farm. BRD causes a significant health and economic burden worldwide that partially stems from the challenges involved in determining the pathogens causing the disease. Methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have the potential to identify the causative pathogens but require lab equipment and extensive sample processing making the process lengthy and expensive. To combat this limitation, LAMP allows accurate pathogen detection in unprocessed samples by the naked eye allowing for potentially faster and more precise diagnostics on the farm. The assay developed here offers 66.7–100% analytical sensitivity, and 100% analytical specificity (using contrived samples) while providing 60–100% concordance with PCR results when tested on five steers in a feedlot. The use of a consumer-grade water bath enabled on-farm execution by collecting a nasal swab from cattle and provided a colorimetric result within 60 min. Such an assay holds the potential to provide rapid pen-side diagnostics to cattle producers and veterinarians.

Increasing feed efficiency in beef cattle is critical for meeting the growing global demand for beef while managing rising feed costs and environmental impacts. Challenges in recording feed intake and combining genomic and nutritional models hinder improvements in feed efficiency for sustainable beef production. This review examines the progression from traditional data collection methods to modern genetic and nutritional approaches that enhance feed efficiency. We first discuss the technological advancements that allow precise measurement of individual feed intake and efficiency, providing valuable insights for research and industry. The role of genomic selection in identifying and breeding feed-efficient animals is then explored, emphasizing the benefits of combining data from multiple populations to enhance genomic prediction accuracy. Additionally, the paper highlights the importance of nutritional models that could be used synergistically with genomic selection. Together, these tools allow for optimized feed management in diverse production systems. Combining these approaches also provides a roadmap for reducing input costs and promoting a more sustainable beef industry.

One hundred twenty Angus × Simmental steers [322 ± 4.8 kg initial body weight (BW)] were blocked by BW and randomly allocated to 4 treatments arranged as a 2 × 2 factorial to evaluate the effects of supplemental arginine (none or 63 g/d of a 15.6% metabolizable arginine), supplemental lysine (none or 40 g/d of a 25% metabolizable lysine), and their interaction on performance and carcass composition of feedlot steers during a 170-d feeding period. The basal diet [dry matter (DM) basis] contained 52% dry-rolled corn, 22% dried distillers grains with solubles, 20% corn silage, and 6% vitamin-mineral supplement. Lysine balance was estimated to be −10.3 to −10.8 g for diets that did not contain supplemental lysine, and arginine supply was estimated to be +9.7 g for diets that did not contain supplemental arginine during period 1 (days 0 to 87). Lysine and arginine supplies met or exceeded requirements in period 2 (days 88 to 170). Rumen-protected arginine and lysine were top dressed daily until slaughter at a common BW (622 ± 5.5 kg). Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Body weight, average daily gain, and DM intake were not affected (P ≥ 0.14) by arginine or lysine supplementation. However, lysine increased gain:feed (P = 0.05) during period 1. Lysine decreased serum urea nitrogen (P = 0.03) on day 87, increased (P = 0.01) longissimus muscle (LM) area, decreased (P ≤ 0.01) fat thickness and yield grade, and tended (P = 0.06) to increase moisture content of LM steaks. There tended to be an interaction for moisture content of steaks (P = 0.09), where arginine supplementation increased moisture content to a greater extent in steaks from cattle supplemented with lysine compared with steaks from cattle not fed supplemental lysine. Arginine tended to increase the proportion of Choice grade carcasses (P = 0.09) but did not change lipid content of steaks (P = 0.59). Arginine tended to decrease serum glutamate (P = 0.09) and lysine (P = 0.07) after 87 d of feeding. In conclusion, supplemental rumen-protected arginine and lysine did not improve performance, but lysine can increase carcass muscle and leanness, and although arginine did not increase lipid content of steaks, it may favorably shift carcasses to a greater quality grade.

The negative impacts of stress on gastrointestinal (GIT) barrier function can result in compromised animal growth and health. Aspirin is known to cause mucosal injury leading to increased gut permeability and tight junction damage and can be used as a model to study leaky gut in cattle. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term impact of aspirin induced chronic leaky gut on cattle growth and carcass attributes. Two treatments were evaluated in 2 studies: control (no aspirin) or 0.25% of the diet DM aspirin fed daily. Diets consisted of 50% corn, 24% dried distillers grains, 20% corn silage and 6 % supplement on a DM basis. In experiment 1, sixteen Angus x Simmental heifers, allotted by BW and breed composition, were fed diets for 154 d. On day 155, heifers were dosed with 1 L of a 180 mM Cr-EDTA solution using an esophageal tube and had urine collected every 1.5 to 3 h for 48 h for analysis of Cr as a measure of gut leakiness. In experiment 2, ninety-six Simmental x Angus steers (355.0 ± 14.8 kg) were allotted by body weight and breed composition and fed treatment diets for 159 d. Weight was recorded monthly and serum was collected on d 159 and analyzed for lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), serum amyloid A (SAA), haptoglobin, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Heifers fed 0.25% aspirin in experiment 1 excreted more Cr into urine compared to heifers not fed aspirin (overall treatment effect, P = 0.01). In experiment 2, aspirin tended to increase serum LBP (P = 0.06), but had no effect on concentrations of IL-6, haptoglobin, SAA, or AST (P ≥ 0.25). Aspirin tended to decrease average daily gain (P = 0.10), decreased hot carcass weight and rib-eye area (P ≤ 0.05), and increased fat thickness, marbling score, and yield grade (P ≤ 0.02). Aspirin tended to increase KPH% (P = 0.10) and had no effect on liver abscesses (P ≥ 0.80). This study indicates that leaky gut induced by long-term administration of aspirin has negative impacts on feedlot performance and carcass composition. The negative impact of aspirin induced leaky gut on animal performance suggests that chronic leaky gut caused by other factors (subacute acidosis, stress) may be a significant problem for the feedlot industry.