Mucosal healing is the mainstream goal of modern treat-to-target strategy as it is associated with a significantly more favorable disease course in IBD patients with either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Recent advances in endoscopic imaging technologies have overcome the traditional concept of mucosal healing assessed with conventional white light imaging, allowing for multiple levels of endoscopic healing up to the boundaries of molecular and functional evaluation. In this review, we focused on conventional and emerging strategies to assess endoscopic healing in ulcerative colitis and ileocolonic Crohn's disease, examining their pros and cons in real life practice.

Background: The Montreal classification has been widely used in Crohn's disease since 2005 to categorize patients by the age of onset (A), disease location (L), behavior (B), and upper gastrointestinal tract and perianal involvement. With evolving management paradigms in Crohn's disease, we aimed to assess the performance of gastroenterologists in applying the Montreal classification. Methods: An online survey was conducted among participants at an international educational conference on inflammatory bowel diseases. Participants classified 20 theoretical Crohn's disease cases using the Montreal classification. Agreement rates with the inflammatory bowel diseases board (three expert gastroenterologists whose consensus rating was considered the gold standard) were calculated for gastroenterologist specialists and fellows/specialists with ≤ 2 years of clinical experience. A majority vote < 75% among participants was considered a notable disagreement. The same cases were classified using three large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT‐4, Claude‐3, and Gemini‐1.5, and assessed for agreement with the board and gastroenterologists. Fleiss Kappa was used to assess within‐group agreement. Results: Thirty‐eight participants from five countries completed the survey. In defining the Montreal classification as a whole, specialists (21/38 [55%]) had a higher agreement rate with the board compared to fellows/young specialists (17/38 [45%]) (58% vs. 49%, p = 0.012) and to LLMs (58% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). Disease behavior classification was the most challenging, with 76% agreement among specialists and fellows/young specialists and 48% among LLMs compared to the inflammatory bowel diseases board. Regarding disease behavior, within‐group agreement was moderate (specialists: k = 0.522, fellows/young specialists: k = 0.532, LLMs: k = 0.577; p < 0.001 for all). Notable points of disagreement included: defining disease behavior concerning obstructive symptoms, assessing disease extent via video capsule endoscopy, and evaluating treatment‐related reversibility of the disease phenotype. Conclusions: There is significant inter‐rater disagreement in applying the Montreal classification, particularly for disease behavior in Crohn's disease. Improved education or revisions to phenotype criteria may be needed to enhance consensus on the Montreal classification.

Background and aims Colorectal gas explosion (CGE) is an exceptional but potentially fatal complication of digestive endoscopy or surgery. The role played by bowel preparations and endoscopic or surgical devices in the risk of CGE is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify risk factors for CGE. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple databases from inception to September 16, 2024 including all reports of CGE according to a systematic review protocol preregistered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023455049). Additionally, we analyzed all trials that measured explosive gas levels after different bowel preparation strategies. Results Twenty-nine case reports, three case series, and eleven trials were included. Thirty-six cases of CGE were described, 12 surgical and 24 endoscopic. Perforation and death following CGE occurred in 81% and 14% of patients, respectively. The most common bowel preparations taken before CGE were enemas (42%) and oral preparations (31%), while 28% of patients did not undergo any bowel preparation. Bowel preparation was reported as inadequate in most CGE (solid stool in 65% and poor in 11%). The most frequent devices that triggered CGE were argon plasma coagulation during endoscopy (58%) and the electric scalpel during surgical procedures (75%). Published trials showed that adequate bowel preparation, together with endoscopic insufflation and suction, reduces intestinal levels of hydrogen and methane. Conclusions CGE predominantly occurs in patients undergoing interventional procedures with inadequate bowel preparation. Achieving optimal bowel preparation, together with endoscopic aspiration, washing, and CO₂ insufflation practically abolishes potentially explosive gas concentrations.

Background/Objectives: Limited data exist on the epidemiology and clinical management of short bowel syndrome (SBS) and chronic intestinal failure (CIF) in Crohn’s disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate these aspects in Italy. Methods: Members of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) were invited to complete a cross-sectional web survey. A subgroup analysis examined the influence of different clinical settings on SBS and CIF management in CD. Results: A total of 47/128 (36.7%) IG-IBD centers participated. Among them, 31.9% were teduglutide (TED) prescribers, and 48.9% were academic centers. The median estimated prevalence of CIF among small bowel CD patients was 1%, and it was significantly higher in academic centers (2.0% [IQR 1–5%] vs. 0.13% [IQR 0–1%], p = 0.02). Seventy-eight percent of centers managed fewer than 10 SBS and CD patients. Routine small bowel measurement and nutritional assessment were performed in only 15% and 42.6% of centers, respectively. TED was prescribed by 12 centers to 35 patients, with a treatment success rate exceeding 50% in 81.8% of centers. Conclusions: The estimated prevalence of CIF in CD patients with small bowel involvement in Italy is 1%. The diagnosis and management practices for SBS and CIF are suboptimal, and TED use is limited.

A woman in her 40s presented with malaise, nausea, reduced appetite, abdominal distention, loose stools and weight loss. Symptoms had started 6 months earlier and worsened in the last 2 weeks. CT enterography showed hypotonic dilated small bowel loops in absence of any mechanical obstruction. Endoscopic examinations including capsule endoscopy did not reveal any obstructing lesion, but a delayed small bowel transit time of the capsule. Duodenal histology revealed Marsh 3a villous atrophy. Secondary causes of intestinal pseudo-obstruction and villous atrophy were investigated. Giardia lamblia trophozoites were found in the stools and in the duodenal biopsies. The patient’s symptoms quickly resolved after metronidazole treatment with complete normalisation of duodenal histology.