Petra Virjonen

Dr. Petra Virjonen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 July 2011 in Acta Acustica united with Acustica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHA. Haapakangas
A. Haapakangas
EKE. Kankkunen
E. Kankkunen
Valtteri HongistoValtteri Hongisto
Valtteri Hongisto
PVPetra Virjonen
Petra Virjonen
DOD. Oliva
D. Oliva
EKE. Keskinen
E. Keskinen

1 March 2009 in Acta Acustica united with Acustica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVPetra Virjonen
Petra Virjonen
JKJ. Keränen
J. Keränen
Valtteri HongistoValtteri Hongisto
Valtteri Hongisto

1 June 2018
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PVPetra Virjonen
Petra Virjonen
Paavo NevalainenPaavo Nevalainen
Paavo Nevalainen
TPTapio Pahikkala
Tapio Pahikkala
JHJukka Heikkonen
Jukka Heikkonen
Trajectories of ships travelling in the Gulf of Finland were predicted using the k-Nearest Neighbours (k-NNs) method. Automatic Identification System (AIS) data gathered via open interface of the Finnish Transport Agency were used. The results will be exploited in a route optimization task for an emission control boat. The task requires prediction several hours ahead with reasonable accuracy. The idea is to compare the trajectories of a new ship and historical ships within a comparison area. The future behaviour of the new ship was estimated with the k-nearest neighbours. The performance of the method as well as the hyper parameters (nearest neighbours, k, and a weighting parameter α) of the proposed model were optimized using nested leave-one-out crossvalidation approach. The method enables the prediction within minutes' accuracy in time and less than 2 km in location several hours ahead, which is more than satisfactory for the route optimization purposes.

1 December 2019 in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PVPetra Virjonen
Petra Virjonen
Valtteri HongistoValtteri Hongisto
Valtteri Hongisto
JRJenni Radun
Jenni Radun
Amplitude modulation exists in many environmental noise types. A penalty has been suggested for legal noise assessment to such sounds, but the scientific evidence is limited. The purpose of this research was to determine the annoyance penalty of amplitude modulated (AM) sound as a function of the modulation frequency fm and depth Dm. A psychoacoustic laboratory experiment was conducted with 40 participants to explore how subjective loudness and annoyance of AM sound depends on fm (from 0.25 to 16 Hz), Dm (from 1 to 14 dB), and overall spectrum (two alternatives). The sounds consisted of both AM sounds and reference sounds without amplitude modulation. The AM sounds were played at 35 dB LAeq, which is typical for environmental noise both indoors and in residential yards. The annoyance penalty increased with increasing fm and Dm. The penalties varied from 4 to 12 dB, when Dm ranged from 4 to 14 dB and fm ranged from 1 to 16 Hz. For the lowest fm= 0.25 Hz, and Dm = 1 dB, no penalty could be suggested. The results suggest a potential need for a penalty for low-level AM sounds for certain ranges of fm and Dm, applied for the periods with AM sound.

1 October 2020 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VHValtteri Hongisto
Valtteri Hongisto
PVPetra Virjonen
Petra Virjonen
HMHenna Maula
Henna Maula
PSPekka Saarinen
Pekka Saarinen
JRJenni Radun
Jenni Radun