Background/Objectives: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Treatment options for localized, early-stage disease include enucleation, brachytherapy, and proton beam therapy. This review aims to evaluate the role of proton therapy in the definitive management of uveal melanoma, focusing on its physics, radiobiology, treatment techniques, and associated outcomes. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current literature on proton therapy for uveal melanoma, emphasizing case selection, treatment efficacy, and side effects. Results: Proton therapy offers significant advantages for thicker uveal melanomas (over 8 mm) due to its unique physical properties, including a rapid dose fall-off that protects critical structures like the retina and optic nerve. Proton therapy may have benefits in tumor control for ocular melanomas given its increased relative biological effectiveness relative to photon therapy for these typically more radioresistant melanomas. Proton therapy may also hold special value for uveal melanomas in close proximity to the optic nerve, as patients are at high risk of visual toxicities with brachytherapy. The review discusses the efficacy of proton therapy across small, medium, and large tumors, along with strategies for improving patient survival through combined systemic therapy. Additionally, the potential of ocular reirradiation with proton therapy is addressed. Conclusions: Proton therapy is an effective treatment for uveal melanoma. It offers advantages over brachytherapy for large tumors, tumors that are close to the optic nerve or insertion of extra-ocular muscles.

Introduction: Skin cancer impacts a significant proportion of the population. While surgical management is often the mainstay of treatment, advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies require additional local and/or systemic therapies. Methods: A review of the literature was performed studying the use of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies. Results: A summary of the present literature on the management of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies is presented across cutaneous head and neck basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. The addition of multidisciplinary therapies to resection is often associated with improved outcomes. Conclusion: The management of cutaneous head and neck malignancies requires an approach integrating multiple specialties, to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicities.

Penile metastases are rare, with about 400 reported via case reports or small series. Under such circumstances coherent data about their behaviour may not be possible given vagaries of publication. For instance, one published meta‐analysis has proposed that malignant priapism contributes to worse survival, but this may be due to selection bias in published reports. We sought to evaluate clinical characteristics associated with survival in an international cohort of patients with metastases to the penis treated in major genitourinary cancer programmes.

Background: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare, aggressive variant of breast cancer, usually triple negative disease and chemotherapy refractory. Despite this, the standard of care remains the same as invasive ductal breast cancer. We sought to analyze patterns of care and outcomes among patients with metastatic MBC. Methods: Patients over 18 years diagnosed with metastatic MBC from 2004-2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinical and demographic details were compared between two groups (chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy). Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of receiving chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival (OS) and Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of covariates on OS. Results: There were 7,580 patients with MBC of which 417 (5.5%) presented with metastatic disease. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54-76) and median follow up for living patients was 48 months (IQR 31-77). One hundred and fifty-six (37.4%) patients received chemotherapy. On multivariable logistic regression analyses, treatment at an academic facility was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving chemotherapy (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.95-5.03, p<0.001) while age ≥65 years (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86, p=0.009) and receipt of hormonal therapy (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.85, p=0.021) were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, higher Charlson-Deyo score (hazard ratio (HR) 1.35-1.78, p<0.05) was associated with worse survival while receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.99, p=0.041) and having insurance (HR 0.34-0.47, p<0.05) were associated with improved survival. Patients who received chemotherapy had improved median (twelve versus eight months), one-year (51% versus 38%), and two-year (35% versus 21%) OS, as compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy (p=0.006). Conclusions: In this study of MBC patients, there was a survival benefit with palliative chemotherapy in the setting of metastatic disease. As expected, treatment was most often given to younger patients.