Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) was a widely used and simple M-mode echocardiographic parameter for determining the left ventricle (LV) longitudinal systolic function. The purpose of this review is to analyze the use of MAPSE as a simple LV systolic function marker in different clinical scenarios, especially given the recent paradox of choices in ultrasound markers assessing cardiac performance. Recent data on the use of MAPSE in the assessment of LV function in different settings seem to be relatively scarce, given the wide variety of possible causes of cardiovascular pathology. There remain significant possible clinical applications of MAPSE utilization. This review included all major articles on the topic of mitral annular plane systolic excursion published and indexed in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. We analyzed the potential implications of using simpler ultrasonographical tools in heart failure diagnosis, prediction, and treatment. MAPSE is a dependable, robust, and easy-to-use parameter compared to ejection fraction (EF) or global longitudinal strain (GLS) for the quick assessment of LV systolic function in various clinical settings. However, there may be a gap of evidence in certain scenarios such as conventional cardiac pacing.

The rising prevalence of cardiovascular disease underscores the growing significance of heart failure (HF). Pathophysiological insights into HF highlight the dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), characterized by sympathetic overactivity and diminished vagal tone, impacting cardiovascular function. Heart rate recovery (HRR), a metric measuring the heart’s ability to return to its baseline rate post-exertion, plays a crucial role in assessing cardiovascular health. Widely applied across various cardiovascular conditions including HF, coronary artery disease (CAD), and arterial hypertension (HTN), HRR quantifies the difference between peak and recovery heart rates. Given its association with elevated sympathetic tone and exercise, HRR provides valuable insights into the perspective of HF, beyond effort tolerance, reaching toward prognostic and mortality indicators. Incorporating HRR into cardiovascular evaluations enhances our understanding of autonomic regulation in HF, offering potential implications for prognostication and patient management. This review addresses the significance of HRR in HF assessment, analyzing recently conducted studies, and providing a foundation for further research and clinical application.

In 10% of ischemic strokes, non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is detected retroactively. Milder, or even asymptomatic forms of NVAF have shown high mortality, thrombotic risk, and deterioration of cognitive function. The current guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AF contain “grey areas”, such as the one related to anticoagulant treatment in men with CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 and women with score 2. Moreover, parameters such as renal function, patient weight or left atrium remodelling are missing from the recommended guidelines scores. Vulnerable categories of patients including the elderly population, high hemorrhagic risk patients or patients with newly diagnosed paroxysmal episodes of atrial high rate at device interrogation are at risk of underestimation of the thrombotic risk. This review presents a systematic exposure of the most important gaps in evaluation of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with NVAF. The authors propose new algorithms and risk factors that should be taken into consideration for an accurate thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk estimation, especially in vulnerable categories of patients.

Nocardia is an emerging bacterial disease that often affects patients with compromised immune systems. As the number of patients undergoing solid organ transplants continues to rise, and as more cancer survivors are treated with long-term immune-modifying agents, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressive medications, organisms that typically pose no harm are becoming a public health concern. Carbapenems are usually a second-line therapy in the setting of Nocardia infections. We present the case of a patient who had an immunocompromised status and was diagnosed with Nocardia farcinica, which showed in vitro resistance to carbapenems. The symptoms were non-specific and had a common presentation with headache, fatigue, and a nonresponsive cough to usual cough drugs, although the infection was disseminated and had severe CNS and ocular involvement. The clinical course worsened when the carbapenem was withdrawn and markedly improved when it was re-administered, although the initial antibiogram showed resistance to carbapenems. Despite the observed in vitro resistance in the laboratory, the re-administration of carbapenems was beneficial, as both inflammatory markers and clinical status showed improvement. This was based on clinical judgment, which carefully evaluated the associated risks and benefits. Also, this raises the question of potential risks to develop real resistance to carbapenems of some Nocardia species, which could pose a significant challenge to healthcare. It could become a serious healthcare problem in the future and should prompt active environmental testing.

Background: Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) was a widely used M-mode echocardiographic marker of left ventricular longitudinal systolic function. On the other hand, right ventricle (RV) apical pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction development due to dysynchronous activation, while non-apical pacing may provide a more physiological LV activation. The aim of this study is to ascertain the clinical usefulness of MAPSE in the assessment of LV contractile function in patients with permanent RV pacing. Methods: Consecutive patients with indication for permanent cardiac pacing (with ventricular pacing percentages over 20% - Vp>20%) were retrospectively enrolled from 2019 to 2023. All patients were assessed by echocardiography with MAPSE, left ventricule ejection fraction (LVEF) and diastolic filling patterns being measured at the time of implant and at subsequent follow-ups. Results: 359 patients (age range 41-80yo; mean age=60,5yo) were included, 244 men and 115 women, 173 implanted with single-chamber devices and 186 dual-chamber. 259 patients were paced from the RVA (right ventricle apex) and 62 had septal lead positioning. The mean follow-up period was 18±2 months. The results showed that a MAPSE cut off value of ≤10 mm was associated with a LVEF10mm were associated with LVEF>45±3% (p<0.01). RV septal pacing was associated with a higher average MAPSE value (14,28 mm) than RVA pacing (13,47). Conclusions: MAPSE seems to corelate well with LVEF in RV conventional pacing. Younger patients with preserved LVEF and less than grade II diastolic dysfunction were not associated with a significant decrese in MAPSE value. However, older patients with HFmrEF and RVA pacing seem to have a more substantial reduction in MAPSE value, suggesting that non-apical or conduction system pacing might be beneficial in this subgroup. MAPSE seems to be a quick and reliable echocardiographic marker of LV systolic function in patients with permanent cardiac pacing. It may be used as an early predictive marker for heart failure in conventional RV paced patients.

Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) in patients with conventional right ventricular pacing with significant pacing percentages is still a subject of concern, and management of HF in this population has historically been difficult; however, novel HF pillar medications, such as SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), have fundamentally transformed contemporary pharmacological HF management. The aim of this study was to assess left ventricular (LV) function after current guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing and HF. Methods: Patients with a lifetime ventricular pacing percentage > 20% (Vp > 20%) and HF diagnosed according to ESC guideline criteria were included. Device interrogation and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), including assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE), were performed at GDMT initiation and during subsequent follow-up. Changes in LVEF and MAPSE were assessed overall and according to baseline HF phenotype. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of changes in LVEF and MAPSE. Results: Among 550 conventionally paced patients screened for HF, 127 (23.1%) met the inclusion criteria and underwent GDMT initiation. Mean age was 68.2 ± 12.1 years, and mean follow-up duration was 10.2 ± 6.3 months. Baseline LVEF and MAPSE were 48.7 ± 6.3% and 12.0 ± 2.4 mm, respectively. All patients received SGLT2i therapy, while 24 (18.9%) received ARNi. Overall, LVEF increased by 1.94 ± 2.47% and MAPSE by 0.84 ± 0.96 mm (both p < 0.001). Patients with HFrEF (n = 25) showed an increase in LVEF of 5.84 ± 2.53% and MAPSE of 1.72 ± 1.21 mm. In patients with HFmrEF, LVEF increased by 2.50 ± 1.54% and MAPSE by 0.83 ± 0.92 mm, whereas in HFpEF, LVEF increased by 0.67 ± 0.78% and MAPSE by 0.58 ± 0.71 mm. NYHA functional class improved by at least one class in 100 patients (78.7%). In multivariable analysis, ARNi use was independently associated with greater improvement in LVEF and MAPSE, while lower baseline LV function was associated with greater subsequent improvement. Conclusions: In patients with HF and chronic RV pacing, GDMT was associated with modest but statistically significant improvements in LV systolic function, assessed by LVEF and MAPSE, across the HF spectrum. The greatest improvements were observed in patients with HFrEF. However, given the observational design, absence of a control group, and universal use of SGLT2i, these findings do not establish a causal treatment effect or demonstrate superiority of any specific GDMT combination. Prospective controlled studies are warranted to determine the clinical significance of these changes and the independent contribution of individual therapies.